Sugar prevalence in Aedes albopictus differs by habitat, sex and time of day on Masig Island, Torres Strait, Australia

Table 3 Direct model output from the linear mixed-effects model fitting the effects of measured parameters on the log fructose content of sugar-fed Aedes albopictus

Predictors	Estimate	SE	CI	P-value
Female and male combined model^a
(Intercept)	2.65	0.16	2.33–2.97	< 0.001***
Sex (male)	− 0.50	0.09	− 0.67 to − 0.33	< 0.001***
Habitat (woodland)	− 0.05	0.14	− 0.33 to 0.22	0.709
Time (morning)	0.15	0.09	− 0.02 to 0.33	0.080
Flowers	− 0.11	0.13	− 0.37 to 0.14	0.373
Female-only model^b
(Intercept)	2.80	0.21	2.38–3.21	< 0.001***
Time (morning)	0.02	0.12	− 0.23 to 0.26	0.89
Habitat (woodland)	− 0.08	0.18	− 0.43 to 0.26	0.641
Flowers	− 0.23	0.18	− 0.58 to 0.12	0.2
Male-only model^c
(Intercept)	2.02	0.26	1.52–2.52	< 0.001***
Time (morning)	0.33	0.12	0.11–0.56	0.004**
Habitat (woodland)	− 0.07	0.22	− 0.50 to 0.36	0.745
Flowers	− 0.03	0.19	− 0.40 to 0.33	0.86

The data were analysed with three models. Asterisks indicate statistical significance
SE Standard error. CI Confidence interval
^aModel 1: the log fructose content of sugar-fed female and male Ae. albopictus. The reference level for Sex is female, the reference level for Habitat is residential, and the reference level for Time is afternoon
^bModel 2: the log fructose content of sugar-fed female Ae. albopictus. The reference level for Habitat is residential and the reference level for Time is afternoon
^aModel 3: the log fructose content of sugar-fed male Ae. albopictus. The reference level for Habitat is residential and the reference level for Time is afternoon

ISSN: 1756-3305