Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparative analysis between the morphometric findings of Aedes aegypti eggs identified in this research and the results of Suman et al. [23], Linley [19], and Faull and Williams [24]

From: Aedes aegypti: egg morphology and embryonic development

 

Ae. aegyptia*

Ae. aegyptib**

Ae. aegyptic

Ae. aegyptid

Ae. aegyptie***

Ae. aegyptif****

Length

581.45 ± 39.73

580.09 ± 32.30

625.65 ± 19.91

670.2 ± 7.2

554.41 ± 36.56

562.62 ± 30.85

Width

175.36 ± 11.59

166.75 ± 19.76

183.30 ± 11.04

186.3 ± 2.2

167.65 ± 7.05

160.15 ± 9.73

Length/width

3.32 ± 0.26

3.51 ± 0.35

3.61 ± 0.05

3.31 ± 0.18

3.52 ± 0.27

Diameter of micropylar disc

18.75 ± 1.92

20.79 ± 1.94

33.49 ± 3.9

34.19 ± 5.4

  1. aEgg population of São Paulo, bEgg population of Maranhão, cEgg population found by Suman et al [23],  dEgg popultaion found by Linley et al [23], eEgg populations of Cairns-Australia found by Faull and WIlliams [24], **** Egg population of Charters Towers-Australia found by Faull and Williams [24]