Skip to main content

Table 2 Molecular identification of species using both ITS2 and COII comparisons

From: Morphological and molecular identification reveals a high diversity of Anopheles species in the forest region of the Cambodia–Laos border

Sequence group

No. of samples (ITS2; COII)

Sequence length in bp (ITS2; COII)

Molecular species ID

Morphology species ID (no.)

No. of sequences identified molecularly

No. of correctly identified specimens based on morphology

% of correctly identified specimens based on morphology

Group 1

22; 21

717; 687

An. dirus

d (22)

22

22

100.00

Group 2

18; 18

457; 674

An. peditaeniatus

s (18)

18

0

0.00

Group 3

17; 7

329; 685

An. maculatus

m (16), phi (1)

17

16

94.12

Group 4

2; 2

353; 685

An. philippinensis

phi (2)

2

2

100.00

Group 5

244; 213

400; 718

An. kochi

k (242), v (1), s (3)

246

242

98.37

Group 6

11; 12

568; 686

An. vagus

v (7), k (5)

12

7

58.33

Group 7

9; 9

467/591; 690

An. tessellatus

t (5), k (4)

9

5

55.56

Group 8

4; 3

480; 686

An. nitidus

s (4)

4

0

0.00

Group 9

59; 53

356; 690

An. nivipes

phi (59)

59

0

0.00

Group 10

8; 8

472; 687

An. argyropus

s (8)

8

0

0.00

Group 11

4; 4

469; 686

An. sinensis

s (4)

4

4

100.00

Group 12

14; 14

508; 687

An. nigerrimus

s (14)

14

0

0.00

Group 13

0; 27

0; 691

An. barbirostris

s (26), k (1)

27

0

0.00

Total

412; 391

442

298

67.42

  1. Morphologically based species identification included: d, An. dirus; s, An. sinensis; m, An. maculatus; phi, An. philippinensis; k, An. kochi; v, An. vagus; t, An. tessellatus. Number and percentage of correctly identified morphological specimens are calculated from the number of sequences that were molecularly identified per species