Table 2 Logistic regression analysis to compare mosquito mortality in Interceptor^® and Interceptor^® G2 ITNs after exposure in WHO cone and tunnel tests, Ifakara ambient chamber test and experimental hut, Tanzania

Anopheles arabiensis (resistant)

 Overall

  Interceptor^®

1

1

1

1

1

  Interceptor^®G2

0.04 (0.03, 0.07)

1.33 (1.17, 1.51)

1.55 (1.16, 2.07)

2.38 (2.09,2.72)

2.43 (1.88, 3.14)

 Unwashed

  Interceptor^®

1

1

1

1

1

  Interceptor^®G2

0.05 (0.20, 0.09)

1.42 (1.19, 1.70)

1.61 (1.05, 2.49)

2.53 (1.96,3.26)

2.55 (1.76, 3.68)

 Washed, 20×

  Interceptor^®

1

1

1

1

1

  Interceptor^®G2

0.04 (0.2, 0.09)

1.23 (1.03, 1.48)

1.50 (1.02, 2.23)

2.36 (2.02, 2.77)

2.32 (1.63, 3.31)

Culex quinquefasciatus (resistant)

 Overall

  Interceptor^®

1

1

1

1

1

  Interceptor^®G2

1.05 (0.57, 1.93)*

2.55 (2.26, 2.55)

13.40 (10.75, 16.67)

1.50 (1.31, 1.73)

1.40 (1.19, 1.63)

 Unwashed

  Interceptor^®

1

1

1

1

1

  Interceptor^®G2

0.74 (0.31, 1.79)*

2.52 (2.13,3.00)

12.71 (9.43,17.14)

1.52 (1.23,1.88)

1.25 (1.00, 1.57)

 Washed, 20×

  Interceptor^®

1

1

1

1

1

  Interceptor^®G2

1.46 (0.62, 3.50)*

2.58 (2.17, 3.06)

14.11 (10.42, 19.11)

1.50 (1.25, 1.80)

1.55 (1.24, 1.94)

An. gambiae s.s. (susceptible)

 Overall

  Interceptor^®

1

1

1

  Interceptor^®G2

0.15 (0.11, 0.19)

0.21 (0.13, 0.32)

0.96 (0.34, 2.72)*

–

–

 Unwashed

  Interceptor^®

1

1

1

  Interceptor^®G2

0.10 (0.06, 0.15)

0.14 (0.07, 0.25)

0.65 (0.18, 2.38)*

–

–

 Washed, 20×

 Interceptor^®

1

1

1

 Interceptor^®G2

0.21 (0.15, 0.30)

0.36 (0.19, 0.69)

1.98 (0.30, 13.3)*

–

–

Aedes aegypti (susceptible)

 Overall

  Interceptor^®

1

1

1

  Interceptor^®G2

0.07 (0.05, 0.11)

0.21 (0.13, 0.32)

0.14 (0.10, 0.20)

–

–

 Unwashed

  Interceptor^®

1

1

1

  Interceptor^®G2

0.08 (0.05, 0.13)

0.53 (0.43, 0.67)

0.05 (0.03, 0.10)

–

–

 Washed, 20×

  Interceptor^®

1

1

1

  Interceptor^®G2

0.07 (0.03, 0.13)

0.43 (0.33, 0.57)

0.28 (0.18, 0.43)

–

–