Skip to main content

Table 3 Contrasts between trapping device estimated marginal means after model fitting for numbers of Anopheles messeae/Anopheles daciae trapped, at a confidence level of 0.95; estimates are back-transformed from the log scale

From: Comparative efficacy of BG-Sentinel 2 and CDC-like mosquito traps for monitoring potential malaria vectors in Europe

Contrasta Ratio SE 2.5% 97.5% P
BG + lure/BG + lure + CO2 0.206 0.075 0.101 0.420  < 0.0001
BG + lure/CDC + CO2 0.467 0.172 0.227 0.960 0.038
BG + lure/CDC light + lure + CO2 0.327 0.120 0.160 0.670 0.002
BG + lure + CO2/CDC + CO2 2.272 0.813 1.127 4.580 0.022
BG + lure + CO2/CDC light + lure + CO2 1.591 0.566 0.792 3.200 0.192
CDC + CO2/CDC light + lure + CO2 0.700 0.252 0.346 1.420 0.321
  1. For descriptions of trapping devices, see Table 1
  2. aResults are averaged for capture site