Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary (R2, DIC and RMSE values) of models used to investigate the relationship between the numbers of female mosquitoes collected with human landing catch and the six alternative outdoor traps

From: A statistical calibration tool for methods used to sample outdoor-biting mosquitoes

Mosquito species and modela

Alternative outdoor trapsb

SUN

BGS

ITT-C

R2

DIC

ΔDIC

RMSE

R2

DIC

ΔDIC

RMSE

R2

DIC

ΔDIC

RMSE

Culex spp. (a)

 Model 1

27.3

1026.6

2.36

49.57

25.1

1038.3

0.00

49.37

19.0

769.3

5.07

48.35

 Model 2

27.1

1025.3

1.05

49.63

25.1

1045.2

6.88

49.48

19.2

770.2

5.88

48.52

 Model 3

27.2

1027.5

3.25

49.66

24.9

1040.6

2.32

49.54

19.4

769.1

4.78

64.60

 Model 4

28.1

1024.3

0.00

49.25

25.5

1044.5

6.23

49.15

21.9

764.3

0.00

43.39

Anopheles arabiensis (b)

 Model 1

17.4

780.3

0.00

36.69

10.8

549.6

0.61

61.31

9.3

534.7

6.37

64.93

 Model 2

17.5

780.3

0.03

36.71

10.8

549.0

0.00

61.35

9.4

528.3

0.00

64.96

 Model 3

17.4

782.5

2.21

36.74

10.7

550.9

1.89

61.75

10.4

534.5

6.17

64.16

 Model 4

19.4

781.6

1.32

36.06

17.2

551.2

2.19

61.98

11.8

530.6

2.30

64.05

Anopheles funestus (c)

 Model 1

14.6

76.5

2.79

8.18

46.6

52.9

0.00

4.24

33.9

111.5

0.00

3.81

 Model 2

14.5

77.0

3.30

8.20

50.2

53.7

0.78

4.10

33.6

112.5

0.97

3.83

 Model 3

14.5

76.0

2.29

8.20

52.6

53.4

0.50

3.37

34.3

112.4

0.87

3.84

 Model 4

16.2

73.7

0.00

8.19

53.4

53.8

0.87

3.96

34.3

112.2

0.69

3.84

Mosquito species and model

MMX

MTR-C

MTR

R2

DIC

ΔDIC

RMSE

R2

DIC

ΔDIC

RMSE

R2

DIC

ΔDIC

RMSE

Culex spp. (a)

 Model 1

12.4

841.0

12.50

67.48

44.7

1236.5

7.95

42.44

44.2

1174.7

6.00

45.00

 Model 2

12.8

838.7

10.27

67.46

44.8

1236.1

7.62

42.38

44.2

1177.1

8.42

45.04

 Model 3

12.8

828.5

0.00

67.47

44.7

1228.5

0.00

42.35

44.2

1168.7

0.00

45.09

 Model 4

15.9

835.5

7.03

66.15

45.4

1235.8

7.29

44.35

43.8

1172.5

3.77

45.08

Anopheles arabiensis (b)

 Model 1

0.8

383.9

3.51

47.19

13.1

991.6

4.43

55.74

11.3

1077.6

12.95

51.96

 Model 2

0.4

382.8

2.46

47.30

10.0

1000.8

13.68

55.74

11.3

1073.0

8.37

51.97

 Model 3

1.4

385.8

5.42

47.23

13.1

987.1

0.00

55.73

11.3

1070.5

5.84

51.96

 Model 4

2.5

380.3

0.00

46.75

12.7

990.5

3.39

55.86

11.1

1064.6

0.00

51.99

Anopheles funestus (c)

 Model 1

31.8

40.9

0.62

5.74

32.6

151.1

1.43

5.56

36.8

120.0

0.00

4.62

 Model 2

30.6

40.3

0.00

5.79

32.4

149.6

0.00

5.58

36.6

120.6

0.56

4.63

 Model 3

30.6

40.7

0.35

5.80

33.4

151.2

1.53

5.51

36.3

122.5

2.45

4.64

 Model 4

30.0

40.4

0.09

5.84

37.4

152.8

3.13

5.20

37.4

120.7

0.65

4.59

  1. DIC Deviance information criteria, R2 coefficient of determination, RMSE root-mean-square error
  2. aSee Table 1 for description of models
  3. bSUN Suna trap, BGS BG-Sentinel trap, ITT-C Ifakara Tent Trap version C, MMX Mosquito Magnet-X trap, MTR-C M-Trap combined with CDC light source, MTR M-Trap. See “Data collection” section for references pertaining to each trap