Skip to main content

Table 3 Tick and flea prevalence and intensity in infested cats of six African countries

From: A community approach for pathogens and their arthropod vectors (ticks and fleas) in cats of sub-Saharan Africa

 

All

Tanzania (%)

Kenya (%)

Uganda (%)

Nigeria (%)

Ghana (%)

Namibia (%)

Rural

Urban

P

Rural

Urban

P

Rural

Urban

P

Rural

Urban

P

Rural

Urban

P

Rural

Urban

P

Ticks

 R. sanguineus s.l.

6.4

8.7

10.5

ns

2.1

  

0.0

0.0

 

0.0

   

30.8

 

0.0

0.0

 

 Rhipicephalus sp.

2.1

0.0

5.3

 

0.0

  

0.0

0.0

 

0.0

   

0.0

 

20.0

9.1

ns

 Rhipicentor sp.

0.7

0.0

0.0

 

0.0

  

0.0

0.0

 

0.0

   

0.0

 

20.0

0.0

ns

 H. elliptica

11.4

0.0

0.0

 

31.9

  

7.1

0.0

 

0.0

   

0.0

 

0.0

0.0

 

 H. leachi

2.1

0.0

0.0

 

0.0

  

0.0

0.0

 

75.0

   

0.0

 

0.0

0.0

 

 H. spinulosa

7.1

8.7

5.3

 

6.4

  

21.4

20.0

ns

0.0

   

0.0

 

0.0

0.0

 

 Haemaphysalis sp.

13.5

4.4

5.3

 

25.5

  

14.3

20.0

ns

25.0

   

0.0

 

20.0

0.0

ns

 Amblyomma sp.

1.4

0.0

0.0

 

0.0

  

0.0

20.0

 

0.0

   

7.7

 

0.0

0.0

 

 Ixodes sp.

0.7

0.0

0.0

 

2.1

  

0.0

0.0

 

0.0

   

0.0

 

0.0

0.0

 

Tick

41.1

21.7

26.3

ns

61.7

  

35.7

40.0

ns

100.0

   

38.5

 

40.0

9.1

ns infestIND eq 'A'

Intensity

 

40.0

16.7

 

4.8

  

20.0

25.0

 

75.0

   

75.0

 

0.0

0.0

 

Shannon’ index

 

1.1

1.3

 

1.2

  

1.0

1.1

 

0.6

   

0.5

 

1.1

0.0

 

Fleas

 C. felis

62.8

65.4

68.2

ns

65.3

100.00

 

28.6

60.0

ns

0.0

   

71.4

 

40.0

81.8

ns

 Echidnophaga sp.

33.8

42.3

54.6

ns

30.6

0.00

 

50.0

10.0

*

0.0

   

0.0

 

40.0

9.1

ns

 Xenopsylla cheopis

0.7

0.0

0.0

 

0.0

0.00

 

7.1

0.0

 

0.0

   

0.0

 

0.0

0.0

 

Flea

81.4

84.6

95.5

ns

79.6

100.00

 

71.4

70.0

ns

0.0

   

71.4

 

60.0

90.9

ns

Intensity

 

5.3

0.0

 

3.3

0.00

 

0.0

0.0

 

0.0

   

0.0

 

0.0

0.0

 

Shannon’ index

 

0.7

0.7

 

0.6

0.00

 

0.9

0.4

 

0.0

   

0.0

 

0.7

0.3

 

Co-infestation

19.6

7.4

21.7

 

42.0

0.00

 

7.1

10.0

 

0.0

   

7.7

 

0.0

0.0

 

Shannon’ index

 

1.2

1.2

 

1.52

0.00

 

1.6

1.2

 

0.6

   

0.9

 

1.6

0.6

 

No. of cats*

158

27

23

 

50

1

 

14

10

 

4

   

13

 

5

11

 
  1. Ectoparasites were only identified molecularly. For each cat, a single extraction was made of a pooled set of ticks and/or fleas, and subsequently screened for the presence of DNA belonging to a particular tick and flea species. The identification was based on ITS1 or on 16S ribosomal mtDNA when the first was not yielding results. Next, the percentage of extracts (i.e., cats) containing DNA of a specific taxon was derived, within the population of infested cats. For statistical outcomes on pairwise macro-geographical differences, we refer to Fig. 2. Habitat differences (rural vs. urban) are investigated for countries with the presence of at least 10% in one of their habitats. As a measure of species diversity Shannon’s index and the accompanying significance level of Fisher’s exact test are provided. P < 0.05: *, P > 0.05: ns (not significant). No individuals were infested with Rhipicephalus appendiculatus, R. simus, R. microplus, or R. senegalensis, A. variegatum and Echidnophaga gallinacea