Skip to main content

Table 2 Tenfold cross-validation results showing scores (%) obtained with four different classification algorithms [linear support vector machine (SVM), partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), Random Forest (RF), and k-nearest neighbors (KNN)]

From: Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry for differential identification of adult Schistosoma worms

Schistosoma mansoni vs Schistosoma japonicuma

Actual group

Predicted group

% Correct

S. japonicum

S. mansoni

SVM

 S. japonicum

22 (TP)

0 (FN)

100 (Sensitivity)

 S. mansoni

2 (FP)

38 (TN)

95 (Specificity)

 

91.7% (PPV)

100% (NPV)

96.8 (Accuracy)

   

95.7 (F1 score)

PLS-DA

 S. japonicum

21 (TP)

1 (FN)

95.5 (Sensitivity)

 S. mansoni

1 (FP)

39 (TN)

97.5 (Specificity)

 

95.5% (PPV)

97.5% (NPV)

96.8 (Accuracy)

   

95.5 (F1 score)

RF

 S. japonicum

22 (TP)

0 (FN)

100 (Sensitivity)

S. mansoni

0 (FP)

40 (TN)

100 (Specificity)

 

100% (PPV)

100% (NPV)

100 (Accuracy)

   

100 (F1 score)

KNN

 S. japonicum

21 (TP)

1 (FN)

95.5 (Sensitivity)

 S. mansoni

1 (FP)

39 (TN)

97.5 (Specificity)

 

95.5% (PPV)

97.5% (NPV)

96.8 (Accuracy)

   

95.5 (F1 score)

S. mansoni (ethanol vs RNAlater)b

Actual group

Predicted group

% Correct

RNAlater

Ethanol

SVM

 RNAlater

20 (TP)

1 (FN)

95.24 (Sensitivity)

 Ethanol

0 (FP)

19 (TN)

100 (Specificity)

 

100% (PPV)

95% (NPV)

97.5 (Accuracy)

   

97.6 (F1 score)

PLS-DA

 RNAlater

21 (TP)

0 (FN)

100 (Sensitivity)

 Ethanol

0 (FP)

19 (TN)

100 (Specificity)

 

100% (PPV)

100% (NPV)

100 (Accuracy)

   

100 (F1 score)

RF

 RNAlater

21 (TP)

0 (FN)

100 (Sensitivity)

 Ethanol

0 (FP)

19 (TN)

100 (Specificity)

 

100% (PPV)

100% (NPV)

100 (Accuracy)

   

100 (F1 score)

KNN

 RNAlater

21 (TP)

0 (FN)

100 (Sensitivity)

 Ethanol

0 (FP)

19 (TN)

100 (Specificity)

 

100% (PPV)

100% (NPV)

100 (Accuracy)

   

100 (F1 score)

S. japonicum (ethanol vs RNAlater)c

Actual group

Predicted group

% Correct

RNAlater

Ethanol

SVM

 RNAlater

11 (TP)

0 (FN)

100 (Sensitivity)

 Ethanol

0 (FP)

11 (TN)

100 (Specificity)

 

100% (PPV)

100% (NPV)

100 (Accuracy)

   

100 (F1 score)

PLS-DA

 RNAlater

11 (TP)

0 (FN)

100 (Sensitivity)

 Ethanol

0 (FP)

11 (TN)

100 (Specificity)

 

100% (PPV)

100% (NPV)

100 (Accuracy)

   

100 (F1 score)

RF

 RNAlater

11 (TP)

0 (FN)

100 (Sensitivity)

 Ethanol

0 (FP)

11 (TN)

100 (Specificity)

 

100% (PPV)

100% (NPV)

100 (Accuracy)

   

100 (F1 score)

KNN

 RNAlater

11 (TP)

0 (FN)

100 (Sensitivity)

 Ethanol

0 (FP)

11 (TN)

100 (Specificity)

 

100% (PPV)

100% (NPV)

100 (Accuracy)

   

100 (F1 score)

  1. TP True positive, TN true negative, FP false positive, FN false negative, PPV positive predictive values, NPV negative predictive values
  2. aDiscrimination of adult S. japonicum from adult S. mansoni; S. japonicum considered a positive category
  3. bDiscrimination of S. mansoni isolates based on the effect of the storage medium; RNAlater considered a positive category
  4. cDiscrimination of S. japonicum isolates based on the effect of the storage medium; RNAlater considered a positive category