First record of besnoitiosis caused by Besnoitia bennetti in donkeys from the UK

Background The involvement of Besnoitia bennetti in skin pathologies was investigated in a series of 20 donkeys from the Donkey Sanctuary in England, in the 2013–2019 period. Methods The initial histopathological finding of Besnoitia cysts in skin lumps that were presumed to be sarcoids in 2013 triggered our cognisance of this parasite and resulted in identification of a total of 20 cases. Histopathological examination of surgical biopsy samples collected from 8 live donkeys and tissue specimens from 12 deceased donkeys at post-mortem examination revealed the presence of Besnoitia cysts in all 20 donkeys. The indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) and immunoblotting analysis showed the presence of anti-Besnoitia antibodies in archived serum samples from 4 deceased donkeys. Additionally, infection was evidenced in one live donkey based on IFAT and immunoblot analysis of tissue fluid of a dermal mass containing Besnoitia cysts, and real-time (RT)-PCR analysis and microsatellite genotyping of DNA isolated from the tissue of the same dermal mass confirmed the infection specifically as B. bennetti. Results Both serological and microsatellite analyses confirmed the aetiology to be B. bennetti. Our findings suggested that in cases of skin masses such as sarcoids, the suspicion of B. bennetti infection should be borne in mind even when clinical and histopathology examination results are negative in order to avoid misdiagnosis. Conclusions This case series documents, to our knowledge, the first report of B. bennetti infection in donkeys in the UK, indicating that donkey besnoitiosis has become noteworthy in the UK. Further investigations of the occurrence, epidemiological characteristics, and clinical manifestations of B. bennetti infection in donkeys and other equids are warranted.


Background
Besnoitiosis in horses, donkeys, mules and zebras is caused by Besnoitia bennetti, which was first described in Sudan in the 1920s. In Europe, this parasite was reported in France in 1922 [1]. Besnoitia bennetti infection manifests clinically as multiple, pinpoint, raised, round, yellow to white, up to about 1 mm in diameter cysts in the skin over the head and body, within the nares, on the external and internal pinnae, and on the limbs and perineum. Mucous membranes, such as the ocular limbar sclera (scleral pearls) and the laryngeal mucosa can be also affected [2]. Affected donkeys and horses may be otherwise healthy or present with generalised cachexia and debilitation, similar to that observed in bovine besnoitiosis [3].
The current standard for diagnosing besnoitiosis in donkeys is based on histopathological examination of tissues, which can take several days to produce results and does not allow differentiation between the different Besnoitia spp. These limitations have driven the development of more efficient alternative methods to histopathology in order to provide accurate information about the etiological agent. These methods were designed to detect specific Besnoitia ribosomal DNA in tissue biopsies using PCR followed by DNA sequencing of the amplicon to identify the species [2,4,5] or measure the level of anti-Besnoitia spp. specific antibodies in the serum using serological assays such as ELISA, immunofluorescent and immunoblotting analysis [4][5][6][7][8][9]. Recently, a more specific genotyping method based on microsatellite markers has been developed to distinguish B. bennetti from the closely related B. besnoiti and B. tarandi, which cause besnoitiosis in cattle and reindeer, respectively [10].
Besnoitiosis in donkeys went from a rarely detected parasite to being reported in donkeys in many countries, including the USA [2,4,7], Spain, [8], Belgium [5], Italy [9] and Portugal [11]. This increase in the number of reports of B. bennetti infection in donkeys and other equids is probably attributed to the increasing awareness of the disease [12]. The emergence of B. bennetti in a new geographical region is often associated with a concern in causing invasive infections and the potential of outbreaks in local donkeys [2].
In the present study, we report for the first time in the UK a series of 20 donkeys infected by B. bennetti. The initial identification of Besnoitia cysts was performed using histopathology and the confirmation of B. bennetti was achieved using molecular assays, including microsatellite typing for the first time in Europe. The implications of the research findings are discussed.

Clinical history
The present study involved 20 donkeys infected by Besnoitia. The donkeys never lived outside the UK, except for one donkey which originated from Ireland. All donkeys in this study were residents of the UK Donkey Sanctuary, kept on various sites in East Devon and a single location in Dorset. The initial case was found incidentally in 2013, when an adult gelding was presented for surgical excision of a small nodular intradermal mass from the periorbital region. The mass was presumed to be a sarcoid; however, histopathology revealed that the intradermal mass consisted of Besnoitia cysts, with no evidence of sarcoid. Subsequent to this case, others in this series presenting with skin masses were also found to have Besnoitia cysts. Since then, Besnoitia cysts have become a routine differential diagnosis for skin masses by the local veterinary team. A growing awareness of other potential symptoms of the parasite, including scleral and conjunctival lesions, enabled, for example, the case with an ocular presentation to be correctly diagnosed.
Between February and December 2019, eight of the donkeys from the series, which were still alive, were clinically examined, either by the author (RS) or by other veterinary surgeons from the Veterinary Team at The Donkey Sanctuary. This included checking their clinical records, in order to establish any disease since Besnoitia cysts were identified. A complete physical examination with particular attention made of the skin, conjunctiva and sclera, was conducted in order to assess the development of any new lesions. A routine oral exam to check the oropharynx and larynx was not carried out; however, all donkeys received routine dental checks every 3-12 months and no lesions were recorded by the attending veterinarian or equine dental technician. Additionally, the lips, rostral tongue and buccal surfaces were visually inspected in July 2019 with respect to cases 2, 4, 5, 6 and 7.

Histopathological examination
Surgical biopsy specimens of the pinpoint nodules found on the conjunctiva or sclera of the eyes, or of the presumed sarcoid haired skin masses were obtained from 8 live donkeys. Additional samples were obtained from lesions observed in 12 other cases during a routine post-mortem examination (PM). Of these 12 donkeys, 8 donkeys were found to have skin masses during PM examination, 2 had presented with laminitis and 2 donkeys had presented with skin masses during ante-mortem clinical examination. These latter 2 donkeys were subsequently euthanized due to inoperable or recurrent sarcoids. All collected samples (PM samples and surgical biopsies) were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, processed routinely, embedded in paraffin-wax, sectioned and stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Mite infestation and other viral, bacterial and fungal agents were ruled out on the basis of clinical signs, history, and the absence of characteristic macroscopic and microscopic lesions for those infectious agents.

Serological analysis
A total of five samples were subjected to serological analysis using indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) and immunoblot analysis. These included one tissue fluid from a dermal nodular mass obtained from one of the live eight cases (donkey no. 8, Table 1) and four archived serum samples that were collected from terminal blood of four donkeys (donkey nos. 3, 4, 5 and 7, Table 2) and kept frozen at − 60 °C. Unfortunately, due to the retrospective nature of the study, serum samples were only available in this small subset of cases, preventing complete assessment of Besnoitia seropositivity in all 20 donkeys. The Bb1Evora03 strain of B. besnoiti was maintained in MARC-145 cell culture and extracellular tachyzoites were purified as previously described [10]. Purified tachyzoites were used to prepare IFAT slides or were pelleted by centrifugation at 1300×g for 10 min and frozen at − 80 °C until used for immunoblotting. Bradyzoites were purified from lichenified and partially alopecic skin samples collected after slaughtered B. besnoiti-infected cattle from Herd-BbGer1, the herd in which besnoitiosis was detected in Germany the first time. These tissues had been frozen at − 20 °C and submitted to the Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Germany. Purification was performed as previously described [10]. Eluted parasites were concentrated by centrifugation at 1300×g for 10 min, and frozen at − 80 °C until used for immunoblotting.

Indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT)
Serial dilutions starting at 1:50 of donkey sera were analyzed for Besnoitia antibodies by IFAT using fluorescein (FITC)-conjugate solution [affinity purified goat antihorse IgG (H + L) (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, USA; diluted 1:50 in PBS)]. The procedure was performed as previously described [10]. Sera from infected or non-infected donkeys were used as positive and negative controls, respectively, sampled during a besnoitiosis outbreak in north-eastern Pennsylvania [7].

Immunoblot analysis
Immunoblots were performed as described previously [10]. Samples containing 2 × 10 6 Besnoitia tachyzoites/ lane were treated for 10 min at 94 °C with non-reducing sample buffer (2% (w/v) SDS, 10% (v/v) glycerol, 62 mM Tris HCl, pH 6.8). The parasite samples were electrophoresed in a 12.5% (w/v) SDS-polyacrylamide minigel together with marker proteins (LMW-SDS Marker Kit, GE Healthcare, Germany). Separated parasite antigens and marker proteins were electrophoretically transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (Immobilon-P, Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) in a semidry transfer system, using a current of 1.5 mA/cm 2 gel for 90 min. The part of the membrane coated with the marker proteins and a 0.5 mm wide strip of the antigen-coated part was cut-off and the transferred proteins were visualized using an India ink stain. The remaining antigencoated membrane was blocked for 30 min at ambient temperature with PBS-TG (PBS, 0.05% (v/v) Tween 20, 2% (v/v) fish gelatine liquid) (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany), air-dried overnight, cut into up to 60 strips, which were stored frozen at − 20 °C. Prior to incubation with diluted serum samples, the strips were blocked again with PBS-TG for 30 min at ambient temperature. Table 1 Summary of donkeys with besnoitiosis presented clinically as skin or ocular masses a Besnoitia bennetti infection was confirmed in a tissue sample by PCR and the tissue fluid of the same sample was reactive to B. besnoiti bradyzoites based on immunoblot results b Besnoitia cysts were associated with ocular lesions c Nodular masses were removed by surgical excision with a cutting laser (except for donkey no. 1 where surgery was performed using scalpel excision as the hospital did not have access to a surgical laser at this time). Histopathology of the excised mass revealed Besnoitia cysts adjacent to the sarcoid tissue in all donkeys, except for donkey no. 1 where only Besnoitia cysts were detected, without any sarcoid neoplasm as was initially suspected and donkey no. 3 where the histopathology was suggestive, but not definitive of sarcoid for the flank mass and no sarcoid tissue was identified in the penile sheath mass d Histological examination of surgical biopsies from the 8 donkeys identified 1 to 3 Besnoitia cysts per biopsy surrounded by mild to moderate number of lymphocytes and/or eosinophils To detect antibodies against parasite antigens, the strips were incubated with serum as previously described [13] with few modifications. Serum samples diluted in PBS-TG were incubated with the strips for 60 min at ambient temperature. Sera were diluted 1:100 with PBS-TG and incubated for 60 min (room temperature). For donkey positive and negative control sera, sera were applied from infected or non-infected donkeys, respectively, sampled during a besnoitiosis outbreak in northeastern Pennsylvania [7]. After washing in PBS-T (PBS, 0.05% (v/v) Tween 20), the strips were incubated with peroxidase conjugate solution (affinity purified goat antihorse IgG (H + L) (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, USA) diluted 1:500 in PBS-TG) for 60 min at ambient temperature. After washing in PBS-T and distilled water, antibody reactions were detected by adding substrate solution (40 μl H 2 O 2 30% (v/v) and 30 mg 4-chloro-1-naphthol (Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) in 40 ml TBS, 20% (v/v) methanol). Relative molecular masses were determined by comparison with the LMW-SDS Marker standard. Reactions to 10 antigen bands were recorded, based on Schares et al. [10]. A positive reaction with at least 4 of the 10 previously selected and described antigenic bands was regarded as a positive immunoblot reaction.

Molecular characterization DNA isolation and real-time (RT)-PCR
A single skin biopsy, containing tissue cysts, from one donkey (donkey no. 8, Table 1) was dissected into 20 portions of 25 mg each and DNA was extracted using a commercial kit (NucleoSpin ® Tissue, Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) according to the manufacturers' instructions. The RT-PCR, which covers all Besnoitia species of ungulates, was performed using the BbRT2 protocol with the primers Bb3 and Bb6 and the probe Bb3-6 (5′-FAM, 3′-BHQ1) as described previously [14].

Clinical characteristics
This case series consists of 20 donkeys. Details of the age, sex, characteristic lesion and clinical history of the 8 live cases and the 12 deceased donkeys are summarized in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. Within this case series, visible Besnoitia cysts were observed in sclera, conjunctiva or laryngeal mucosa of 4 donkeys during PM examination, whilst 6 donkeys were diagnosed with skin masses during PM examination and Besnoitia cysts were identified at histopathology (Table 2). Two other cases (donkey nos. 7 and 9, Table 2) were diagnosed with sarcoids whilst alive, but later on were euthanized due to inoperable or recurrent sarcoids and histopathology examination of biopsy of the sarcoid tissue confirmed the presence of Besnoitia cysts adjacent to sarcoids. Additionally, Besnoitia cysts were detected in surgical biopsies in 8 donkeys that are still alive.
Those cases presented clinically as skin masses were managed by surgical excision and Besnoitia cysts were excised with lesion-free margins. To date, there have been no recurrence of these lesions and surgical excision appears to be locally curative. However, it is worthy to mention that the authors cannot definitively prove or disprove whether Besnoitia cysts were present in other locations of the body in these cases. There was a single case with an ocular presentation (donkey no. 6, Table 1), which was presented with ulcerative keratitis, conjunctivitis, epiphora, blepharospasm and chemosis. The affected eye was treated with systemic phenylbutazone 2.2 mg/kg body weight p/o BID for analgesic and antiinflammatory purposes, in addition to topical application of chloramphenicol and 0.4% hyasent-S (Remend dry eye lubricant drops, Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany). The attending veterinarian noted an unusual pattern of corneal ulceration, which healed rapidly but conjunctival symptoms persisted. At subsequent examination, small nodules were identified as depicted in the photograph presented as Fig. 1. Due to the suspicion that these nodules may represent an eosinophilic keratoconjunctivitis or infection with Besnoitia, a biopsy of the lesion was performed. The conjunctival biopsy demonstrated the presence of Besnoitia cysts, but the presence of further  Table 1). The cysts appear as multiple, up to 1 mm in diameter, round, white and firm nodules (arrow) cysts elsewhere in the conjunctiva has to date, not been excluded. However, there has been no recurrence of clinical signs of keratitis or conjunctivitis.
Clinical checks of the 8 donkeys were performed in early 2019 and 2 donkeys (donkey nos. 3 and 8, Table 1) have had recurrence of their sarcoids but there was no evidence of Besnoitia cysts. Other cases have had recurrence of masses in the same location or elsewhere on the body but have not had surgical removal or histopathological analysis. Donkey case 8 was also presented for weight loss investigation in late 2019, alongside a history of corneal ulceration and multiple episodes of white line disease and abscessation causing lameness. The attending veterinarians considered the weight loss to be due to an episode of colitis. This donkey had a nodular lump surgically excised from the right flank in October 2019, histopathology of this mass did not show the presence of any Besnoitia cysts and the mass was diagnosed as sarcoid.

Histological lesions
Examination of the sampled tissues by light microscopy revealed a low to moderate number of spherical to ovoid protozoal cysts that measured 80-450 µm. These cysts were present multifocally within the superficial and/or deep dermis, the submucosa of the larynx, the iris, the submucosa of the conjunctiva, sclera, upper, lower and third eyelid. Mature cysts consisted of an outer, thick, hyalinised, eosinophilic layer, a layer consisting of the cytoplasm of host cells and one or more host cell nuclei and an inner layer that formed the parasitophorous vacuole, which was filled with myriads of tightly packed bradyzoites (Fig. 2).
Some of the cysts were surrounded by low to moderate number of lymphocytes, plasma cells, eosinophils and histiocytes, whereas others were not associated with any inflammation. In seven cases, one or two parasitic cysts were incidentally identified neighbouring tumours that had histopathological features of sarcoids. In seven other cases, Besnoitia spp. cysts were identified incidentally in donkeys from samples taken for other reasons. In one case diagnosed with a sarcoid, a single Besnoitia cyst and moderate numbers of eosinophils were identified in the subcapsular space and the medullary sinuses of the inguinal lymph node, respectively (presumed drainage from the inflamed Besnoitia cysts). In two cases, Besnoitia spp. cysts were identified in sections of the ocular sclera, conjunctiva, iris, larynx and muzzle. In one donkey, Besnoitia spp. cysts were associated with conjunctivitis. In two donkeys, diagnosed with chronic laminitis, a single Besnoitia cyst, surrounded by moderate lymphoplasmacytic inflammation, was detected within the laminar corium and the stratum lamellatum, respectively. Other histopathologic findings of the haired skin that were not associated with the presence of cysts included mild diffuse orthokeratotic hyperkeratosis and mild lymphoplasmacytic and eosinophilic dermatitis.

Serological findings
Archived serum samples from four donkeys (donkey nos. 3, 4, 5 and 7, Table 2), in addition to a tissue fluid sample obtained from one of the live eight clinical cases (donkey no. 8, Table 1 (Fig. 3).

Real-time (RT)-PCR results
Individual DNAs of several skin portions obtained from one donkey (donkey no. 8, Table 1) were examined by RT-PCR (BbRT2) assay. All samples tested positive, but to a variable extent. Quantification cycle (Cq) values ranged from 22.7 to 42.9 (median 31.4).

Microsatellite typing
DNA with lowest Cq value was used to amplify microsatellite marker regions. This analysis revealed microsatellite  (Table 3).

Discussion
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a series of cases of besnoitiosis in donkeys in the UK and the first time that the presence of B. bennetti infection in donkeys in Europe has been confirmed by microsatellite typing. Clinical besnoitiosis, typically characterized by weight loss, malaise and generalized dry skin, has not been observed in the cases reported herein. On the contrary, clinical presentation in the UK, of the ante-mortem cases, has chiefly been that of small skin masses with one case of ocular scleral besnoitiosis. Where lesions were confined to small nodular intradermal masses, there was limited health impact on the donkeys concerned. The first B. bennetti cases were identified incidentally as the skin masses were presumed to be sarcoid neoplasms. This is relevant with respect to UK practitioners as Besnoitia cysts should now be included as a differential diagnosis for sarcoids, at least in donkeys. This has implications for the prognosis for the individual animal and may be relevant for insurance purposes. At present it cannot be certain whether Besnoitia infection is confined to the donkey population or whether it has not been identified yet in other equines in the UK. Further studies to establish whether the cysts are also present in the horse and pony populations are warranted.
In Europe, clinical cases of besnoitiosis have been reported in France [1] and in Spain based on clinical signs and histopathological detection of cysts [8]. A later serological survey in Spain combining ELISA and western blot detected antibodies against Besnoitia spp. in donkeys, mules and horses [16]. Two cases of besnoitiosis in donkeys were reported in Belgium where B. bennetti infection was suspected based on clinical, histological, serological and molecular tools [5]. Recently, serological evidence for Besnoitia sp. infection, based on IFAT and western blot analysis, was detected in 0.3% of 385 horses from Portugal [11]. However, the identity of the Besnoitia sp. was not confirmed by microsatellite typing in Europe yet. The typing based on ribosomal DNA (rDNA) of the cases in Belgium revealed a difference of only 0.53% (i.e. differences in 5 of 938 nucleotide positions) relative to sequences of B. besnoiti and B. caprae [5] and, the sequence was not compared to B. tarandi. The comprehensive analysis performed in our study, using two serological assays on four serum and one tissue fluid samples, Fig. 3 Immunoblot reactions against non-reduced Besnoitia besnoiti tachyzoite or bradyzoite antigens of donkeys from UK suspected of being infected with Besnoitia bennetti. Antigen bands selected for scoring the immunoblot reactions are marked (<). Ten tachyzoite and 10 bradyzoite antigen bands were recorded due to the absence of cross-reactivity to Sarcocystis spp., N. caninum or T. gondii [10]. Apart from one sample (tissue fluid, donkey no. 8, tachyzoite antigen), all tested samples showed positive reactions with more than 3 of the selected 10 antigen bands (see text for details on the number of recorded bands per sample). Lane 1: tissue fluid from donkey no. 8 (Table 1); Lanes 2-5: sera from donkey nos. 3, 4, 5 and 7 (Table 2). Abbreviations: Mr, relative molecular weight; N, negative; P, positive control donkey sera obtained from a previous study in the USA [7]  In this study, several of the donkeys had histopathology performed on tissue surgically excised from sites that had previously had masses removed from the same area (i.e. recurrence of masses in same body area). Besnoitia cysts were only detected in the second round of histopathology examination, which may mean that Besnoitia cysts were not present in the lumps examined at the time of the first surgery, or that Besnoitia cysts may have been present but were missed. Therefore, we suggest that one needs to be careful when performing histopathology to not miss Besnoitia cysts. Indeed, alongside the sarcoids there was often only one cyst that could be missed in routine histopathological examination. Therefore, correct identification of Besnoitia cysts in excisional skin biopsies taken from UK donkeys does have a clinical advantage for veterinarians providing a more accurate prognosis where a skin mass has been identified. It can no longer be assumed that skin masses are either neoplastic in origin or inflammatory, such as eosinophilic granulomas, for example. In this case series, there does appear to be a correlation between the presence of sarcoid neoplasms and the presence of Besnoitia cysts, but this has not been subjected to statistical analysis. It is not possible to know whether the presence of Besnoitia cysts exacerbates sarcoid development or whether sarcoid tissue predisposes for the establishment of Besnoitia cysts in the adjacent dermis, or it is incidental, due to the frequency of sarcoids in donkeys. Noteworthy in the histopathology of 2 cases diagnosed with chronic laminitis was the presence of Besnoitia cysts, associated with moderate inflammation, within the stratum lamellatum and laminar corium of the hoof, suggesting that Besnoitia cysts may have played a role in laminitis development. Earlier reports showed a correlation between besnoitiosis and laminitis in cattle [17,18]. Therefore, although our finding may be incidental, considering the associated inflammation, it is believed that the infection could, at least in part, contribute to this chronic inflammation of the hoof laminae. Further studies are required to determine whether there is any association between comorbidity with Besnoitia and sarcoids, Besnoitia and ocular lesions, Besnoitia and laryngeal lesions and the relevance between presence of Besnoitia cysts within the laminar corium and chronic laminitis in donkeys.
Much about the epidemiology of B. bennetti remains unknown. Besnoitia bennetti has been thought of historically as an exotic parasite and donkey besnoitiosis has been considered as an emerging disease [11,19]. This raises the question about the source of infection and possible route of transmission in donkeys in the UK. Since its discovery, the route of B. bennetti transmission has not been clearly defined. Attempts to identify the definitive host for B. bennetti have been unsuccessful, precluding researchers from elucidating the parasite's life-cycle [7]. All the donkeys described in this case series were kept in large groups on sites within a limited geographical range in East Devon and Dorset in England. It is possible that some factors specific to this cohort (e.g. the potential for transmission by blood-sucking insect vectors) may have facilitated B. bennetti transmission in these donkeys, similar to Besnoitia infection in cattle [20,21]. However, the role of insect vectors in the transmission of donkey besnoitiosis has yet to be identified. Given the large number of donkeys kept on these sites, and the low case incidence, it can be assumed that the transmission rate remains low. However, we cannot be certain that we have identified and diagnosed all cases so far. Further studies are required to identify potential perpetuating factors, such as underlying disease, coinfection, the presence of potential wildlife reservoirs, or climatic conditions. In our study, the donkeys presenting with intradermal masses were treated using surgical excision. Excision appears to have been locally curative as to date, no recurrence of skin masses has been recorded at the original presenting site. However, as mentioned above, it remains unknown whether this excisional treatment has been curative on a whole animal basis as there may well be other cysts elsewhere that have not been identified. Likewise, there has been no recurrence of clinical signs of conjunctivitis in the case with ocular presentation; however, the presence of cysts, in areas of the conjunctiva that cannot be assessed, again cannot be excluded. The second case with ocular Besnoitia cysts, found at PM examination, had a lengthy history of corneal ulceration and conjunctivitis, and arguably the presence of Besnoitia cysts had a detrimental ante-mortem effect on this donkey. The third case with ocular cysts, found at PM, had an ante-mortem history of epiphora. This was not present in the eye affected by the Besnoitia cysts and was not associated with any inflammation. Therefore, it is unlikely that Besnoitia was the cause of ocular symptoms in this donkey. In cases where laryngeal cysts have been identified, peripheral inflammation has been found around them. Although clinical signs of laryngeal discomfort in these donkeys were not reported, it cannot be ruled out entirely. Ongoing monitoring and investigation of clinical cases is justified to further elucidate any negative impact the presence of Besnoitia cysts may have on the donkeys. Given the lack of effective chemotherapeutic treatment for besnoitiosis, further research is required to determine the optimal treatment regimen, if any, for B. bennetti infection affecting donkeys. In the cases presented here, it is apparent that symptomatic treatment of associated inflammation, is all that has been required.

Conclusions
Our results provided new insights into the presence of B. bennetti in donkeys in the UK and raised awareness of besnoitiosis in donkeys in the UK, particularly as a differential diagnosis for skin masses including sarcoids. Given the relative proximity to other European countries, where clinical besnoitiosis is apparent, UK veterinarians should be aware of the potential for this disease and the pattern of clinical signs during clinical examination. More efforts to understand B. bennetti phylogenetic and genomic properties are needed. This will improve the understanding of the epidemiology and the spread of besnoitiosis in donkeys and other equids, which may ultimately impact clinical management of equine besnoitiosis.