Table 1 Detection of Anaplasma pathogens in sheep and cattle at various geographic sites
County | No. infected/(%) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. tested | Sheep | No. tested | Cattle | Total | |||||
A. ovis | A. phago* | A. ovis + A. phago | A. bovis | A. phago | A. bovis + A. phago | ||||
Yecheng | 20 | 18 (90.0) | 5 (25.0) | 4 (20.0) | 22 | 1 (5.0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 42 |
Akto | 23 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 22 | 1 (4.3) | 4 (17.4) | 0 (0) | 45 |
Pishan | 20 | 10 (50.0) | 1 (5.0) | 1 (5.0) | 21 | 1 (5.0) | 1 (5.0) | 1 (5.0) | 41 |
Hotan | 20 | 5 (25.0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 20 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 40 |
Kashgar | 19 | 14 (73.7) | 9 (47.4) | 9 (47.4) | 20 | 2 (10.5) | 3 (15.8) | 1 (5.3) | 39 |
Artux | 23 | 4 (17.4) | 21 (91.3) | 4 (17.4) | 20 | 1 (4.3) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 43 |
Total | 125 | 51 (40.5) | 36 (28.8) | 18 (14.4) | 125 | 6 (4.8) | 8 (6.4) | 2 (1.6) | 250 |