From: Temporal dynamics of the tick Ixodes ricinus in northern Europe: epidemiological implications
Y = Larva abundance | Estimate (SE) | z-value | P-value |
Intercept | -5.426 (1.002) | -5.41 | <0.005 |
Vole abundance | 0.029 (0.009) | 3.11 | 0.002 |
Amount of adult ticks during the previous session | 1.007 (0.308) | 3.27 | 0.001 |
SatDef | 0.969 (0.192) | 5.03 | <0.005 |
Random effect: site | σ2 = 4.59e-06 (SD = 0.002) | ||
Negative binomial dispersion parameter | 0.34 (SE = 0.06) | ||
Y = Nymph abundance | Estimate (SE) | z-value | P-value |
Intercept | -0.279 (0.233) | -1.20 | 0.232 |
Amount of adult ticks during the same session | 0.381 (0.167) | 2.28 | 0.023 |
Random effect: site | σ2 = 0.098 (SD = 0.31) | ||
Negative binomial dispersion parameter | 1.12 (SE = 0.21) | ||
Y = Adult (male + female) abundance | Estimate (SE) | z-value | P-value |
Intercept | -1.294 (0.461) | -2.81 | 0.005 |
SatDef | 0.621 (0.239) | 2.60 | 0.009 |
SatDef2 | -0.098 (0.037) | -2.63 | 0.009 |
Amount of nymph during the same session | 0.222 (0.075) | 2.97 | 0.003 |
Amount of nymph during the previous session | -0.135 (0.071) | -1.91 | 0.056 |
Random effect: site | σ2 = 0.33 (SD = 0.57) | ||
Negative binomial dispersion parameter | 3.04 (SE = 0.81) | ||
Y = Female + nymph abundance | Estimate (SE) | z-value | P-value |
Intercept | 0.011 (0.316) | 0.04 | 0.971 |
Vole abundance | 0.006 (0.003) | 1.98 | 0.048 |
Random effect: site | σ2 = 0.27 (SD = 0.52) | ||
Negative binomial dispersion parameter | 1.53 (SE = 0.29) |