Desmozoon lepeophtherii n. gen., n. sp., (Microsporidia: Enterocytozoonidae) infecting the salmon louse Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Copepoda: Caligidae)
© Freeman and Sommerville; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 1 November 2009
Accepted: 27 November 2009
Published: 27 November 2009
A microsporidian was previously reported to infect the crustacean parasite, Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Krøyer, 1837) (Copepoda, Caligidae), on farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) in Scotland. The microsporidian was shown to be a novel species with a molecular phylogenetic relationship to Nucleospora (Enterocytozoonidae), but the original report did not assign it to a genus or species. Further studies examined the development of the microsporidian in L. salmonis using electron microscopy and re-evaluated the molecular findings using new sequence data available for the group. Here we report a full description for the microsporidian and assign it to a new genus and species.
The microsporidian infects subcuticular cells that lie on the innermost region of the epidermal tissue layer beneath the cuticle and along the internal haemocoelic divisions. The mature spores are sub-spherical with a single nucleus and an isofilar polar filament with 5-8 turns in a double coil. The entire development is in direct contact with the host cell cytoplasm and is polysporous. During early merogony, a diplokaryotic nuclear arrangement exists which is absent throughout the rest of the developmental cycle. Large merogonial plasmodia form which divide to form single uninucleate sporonts. Sporogonial plasmodia were not observed; instead, binucleate sporonts divide to form two sporoblasts. Prior to final division, there is a precocious development of the polar filament extrusion apparatus which is associated with large electron lucent inclusions (ELIs). Analyses of DNA sequences reveal that the microsporidian is robustly supported in a clade with other members of the Enterocytozoonidae and confirms a close phylogenetic relationship with Nucleospora.
The ultrastructural findings of the precocious development of the polar filament and the presence of ELIs are consistent with those of the Enterocytozoonidae. However, the confirmed presence of an early diplokaryotic stage and a merogonial plasmodium that divides to yield uninucleate sporonts instead of transforming into a sporogonial syncitium, are features not currently associated with the family. Yet, analyses of DNA sequence data clearly place the microsporidian within the Enterocytozoonidae. Therefore, due to the novelty of the copepod host, the ultrastructural findings and the robust nature of the phylogenetic analyses, a new genus should be created within the Enterocytozoonide; Desmozoon lepeophtherii n. gen. n. sp. is proposed.
Microsporidia infect a wide range of invertebrate and vertebrate taxa, and are common parasites of both fish and arthropods. Reports of microsporidian infections in marine and freshwater crustacea are also numerous and include various microsporidian genera infecting marine crabs [1–4], brine shrimp , cladocerans [6, 7], ostracods , marine shrimps [9–14], amphipods , freshwater crayfish , marine lobster  and copepods [18–22].
Although nine genera and approximately 50 species of microsporidia have been described from copepods [18, 20, 22], none have been described from free-living marine copepods. However, there are two reports of microsporidia as hyperparasites of parasitic marine copepods. An unidentified microsporidian, phylogenetically related to Nucleospora spp. (Enterocytozoonidae), has been reported to infect the caligid copepod Lepeophtheirus salmonis parasitic on farmed Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar[21, 23], and Unikaryon mytilicolae (Durfort, Vallmitjana & Vivares, 1980) has been found infecting the cyclopoid copepod Mytilicola intestinalis (Steuer, 1902) on marine mussels . A single report also exists for the hyperparasitic microsporidian, Microsporidium lamproglenae, infecting the freshwater copepod Lamproglena pulchella (von Nordmann, 1832) parasitic on the cyprinid fish, Leuciscus leuciscus L. in Europe .
The majority of microsporidians described from free-living freshwater copepods have complex life cycles utilising copepods as intermediate hosts and mosquito larvae as definitive hosts [26–28]. The life cycles of the microsporidians infecting parasitic marine copepods are not fully known. However, the hyperparasitic microsporidian infecting L. salmonis was shown experimentally not to transmit directly from copepod to copepod. Furthermore, the microsporidian DNA was isolated from internal tissues from the fish host, suggesting that the Atlantic salmon may be involved in the life cycle .
The microsporidian hyperparasite from L. salmonis was placed in the Enterocytozoonidae by Freeman et al.  based on the results of robust phylogenetic analyses, but they did not assign it to a genus. At that time, only two genera existed in the Enterocytozoonidae. Enterocytozoon, containing a single species, Enterocytozoon bieneusi (Desportes, 1985), an intestinal parasite of humans and other mammals [29, 30] and now known to be comprised of numerous genotypes infecting a wide range of mammals and birds . The second genus, Nucleospora, is comprised of intranuclear microsporidians infecting fish [32–34]. The microsporidian from L. salmonis could not be placed in either the Enterocytozoon or the Nucleospora as the host species was too dissimilar and it was neither an intranuclear microsporidian nor one infecting intestinal enterocytes. In addition, the small round to sub-spherical spores of the microsporidian from L. salmonis, measuring 2.34 × 1.83 μm (± 0.01 μm), developing without sporophorous vesicles and forming large xenomas (up to 300 μm in diameter) in the sea lice hosts were sufficiently unique features to enable it to be distinguished from all previously described microsporidia from copepods in freshwater as well as microsporidia infecting other marine crustacea .
Since Freeman et al.  assigned the microsporidian from L. salmonis to the family Enterocytozoonidae, a new genus, Enterospora, has been created in the family for intranuclear microsporidia infecting the hepatopancreatocytes of marine decapods  and a new species Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei, only the second species in the genus, has been described from the cytoplasm of the tubule epithelial cells of the hepatopancreas in the black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon (Fabricius, 1798) from Thailand . Thus, the Enterocytozoonidae currently contains three genera: Enterocytozoon spp. that infect the cell cytoplasm of mammalian and bird enterocytes and tubule epithelial cells of the hepatopancreas in the black tiger shrimp, Nucleospora spp. that infect the nucleus of various fish cells and Enterospora spp. that infect the nucleus of hepatopancreatocytes in marine decapods.
In the present study we examine the ultrastructure of the microsporidian infecting L. salmonis from farmed Atlantic salmon and provide an updated molecular phylogenetic analysis. Using the combined data we describe Desmozoon lepeophtherii n. gen. n. sp., and place it in the Enterocytozoonidae as a fourth genus of the family.
Salmon lice, Lepeophtheirus salmonis, were collected from salmon farms on the West Coast of Scotland. Adult lice were carefully removed using forceps from recently culled fish during routine harvests. Specimens were transferred from the farm site to the laboratory in bags of seawater at ambient temperature and salinity. Once in the laboratory, specimens were maintained in seawater collected from the farm site, aerated at 10°C in 10 L aquaria. Daily removal of senescent and dead lice with 80% water change allowed the remaining lice to survive without their hosts for several days.
Lice were screened for the presence of microsporidian infection using a dissecting microscope. Lice with inclusions under the carapace were dissected and fresh squash preparation observed to confirm the presence of microsporidian spores using a compound microscope. Confirmed infected lice were dissected further as required and fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 2 hours, washed in cacodylate rinse buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.2) overnight. Samples were then post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide (in 1% borax solution) for one hour, before dehydration through a graded acetone series. After dehydration to 100% acetone, the samples were transferred to a 1:1 mix of Spurr resin  and acetone for 1 hr on a rotator followed by a further 2 hr in a mix of 3:1 Spurr: acetone. Finally, the specimens were rotated for 24 hr in 100% Spurr resin before being embedded in Beem capsules and polymerised at 60°C for 48 hrs.
All sections were cut using a glass knife on a Reichert Ultracut E ultramicrotome. Semi-thin sections of 1 μm were first cut and visualised by staining with 1% alcian blue for 5 min and examined under light microscopy. Ultrathin sections (80 nm) were mounted on 200 mesh Formvar coated copper grids and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Ultrathin sections were examined with a Philips 301 TEM operating at 80 kV. Photographs were taken with a flat plate camera using black and white Kodak 4489 EM film.
Whole infected lice were frozen in liquid nitrogen and fractured whilst under nitrogen, by applying pressure to the carapace with a scalpel. Fractured lice were then fixed at 4°C for one hour in 1% gluteraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer. This initial fixation was followed by a 2-3 day immersion in 3% gluteraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer at 4°C, followed by an over night rinse in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer. Samples were then post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide (in 1% borax solution) for 2 hrs, before dehydration through a graded ethanol series. Once in 100% ethanol, samples were transferred to a 50:50 mix of ethanol and hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS) for 30 min before being transfered to 100% HMDS for a further 30 min. Samples were air-dried at room temperature over night, mounted on aluminium stubs and coated with gold at 40 mA for 90s using an Edwards S150B Sputter Coater. Samples were examined using a Philips 500 scanning electron microscope operating at 15 kV. Photographs were taken using an integral camera with Ilford FP4-125 film.
Representative small subunit ribosomal DNA (SSU rDNA) sequences from the Enterocytozoonidae were used in order to view the relatedness of genera and species within the family. Sequences used are available in GenBank under the following accession numbers: Desmozoon lepeophtheriiAJ431366; Enterocytozoon bieneusiL07123; Enterocytozoon bieneusiDQ793212; Enterocytozoon hepatopenaeiFJ496356; Nucleospora salmonisU10883; Nucleospora salmonisAF186003; Nucleospora salmonisAF185989; Nucleospora salmonisAF186006; Nucleospora sp. AF186007; Microsporidium sp. AF394528; Microsporidium sp. FJ794872. Sequences were aligned using ClustalX  and percentage divergence matrices constructed using the Neighbour-joining method . The same alignment files were used to construct phylogenetic trees using heuristic searches and maximum parsimony in PAUP*4.0 beta10 .
In accordance with section 8.6 of the ICZN's International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, copies of this article are deposited at the following five publicly accessible libraries: Natural History Museum, London, UK; American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA; Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France; Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia; Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Occasional host cell remnants could be seen in large xenomas but smaller xenomas contained multiple nuclei, nuclear fragments or multi-lobed nuclei (Fig. 3b); the microsporidian was never observed to have a close association with the host cell nucleus or seen as intranuclear at any stage of development. The microsporidian remained in direct contact with the host cell cytoplasm throughout the developmental cycle and did not form a complete interfacial envelope of either parasite-derived or host-derived origin that contained a typical number of spores.
Figure 3c is an early meront and is the earliest microsporidian stage that was observed. The nucleus is in a diplokaryotic arrangement and the cytoplasm is electron lucent lacking other cellular organelles. The diplokaryotic nuclei of the early meronts divide to produce two diplokaryotic nuclei which locate at opposing cellular borders (Fig 3d). Cytokinesis follows this nuclear division and the cell divides by binary fission, producing two new meronts each with a diplokaryon (Fig 3d); during this division the cytoplasm has a much more granular appearance. The diplokaryotic nuclear arrangement was not observed after this point in the developmental phase and nuclear dissociation is assumed to have occurred. Nuclear dissociation is followed by multiple subsequent nuclear divisions, which are not directly linked to cytokinetic events, resulting in the formation of a large, paucinucleate, rounded, merogonial plasmodium, which ultimately divides by plasmotomy (Fig 3e). During division, the plasmodium contains very granular cytoplasm with no obvious organisation of organelles and the nuclei have electron-dense laminate bodies lying on the nuclear membrane, indicative of recent nuclear activity from either nuclear dissociation or recent division (Fig 3f).
Host cell nuclei of microsporidian-infected cells were sometimes observed with intranuclear inclusions, which were of a crystalline appearance having a regular pattern (Figs 5d).
Percentage divergence of SSU rDNA sequences for members of the Enterocytozoonidae and related taxa.
1. Desmozoon lepeophtherii
2. Enterocytozoon bieneusi (human)
3. Enterocytozoon bieneusi (bird)
4. Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei
5. Nucleospora salmonis (CS)
6. Nucleospora salmonis (RT)
7. Nucleospora sp. (ES)
8. Nucleospora salmonis (AS)
9. Nucleospora salmonis (AH)
10. Microsporidium sp. (DP)
11. Microsporidium sp. clone B
Tissue location of Desmozoon lepeophtherii in L. salmonis
The epidermal layer in copepods is described as a flattened cellular layer containing a great number of membrane-bound vesicles and mitochondria, with a very complicated spatial arrangement . This complex arrangement of cells was confirmed to be similar in L. salmonis in the present study (Fig 3a). The basal portion of the epidermal layer rests on a glycocalyx , which is also referred to as the basal lamina and functions as a basement membrane separating the epidermal layer from the underlying tissues and haemocoel . The glycocalyx contains epidermal cells such as modified epithelial cells with tonofilaments, desmocytes or fibrocytes and tissue dwelling haemocytes . Microsporidian xenomas develop from this location, but due to the extreme hypertrophy and transformation of infected host cells due to xenoma formation, their identity can only be hypothesised from our current knowledge. We believe that infection is primarily in the desmocytes, as infection is also seen along the haemocoelic divisions that have little or no such epidermal tissue layer. However, it is also possible that phagocytic haemocytes become infected, or are involved with the spread of the infection throughout the copepod, or are responsible for the initial transportation of spores from the portal of entry to the site of infection. Xenoma formation has not been reported for other members of the Enterocytozoonidae.
Comparative ultrastructural features of Desmozoon and the Enterocytozoonidae (Table 2)
Characteristics of the four microsporidian genera contained within the family Enterocytozoonidae
Desmozoon n. gen.
Caligid copepod, Lepeophtheirus salmonis
Mammals and birdsa and penaeid shrimpb
Fish (salmonid, freshwater, and marine)
Marine decapod crabs
Host cell-type infected
Desmocytes in the glycocalyx bordering haemocoelic cavities
Tubule epithelial cells of the hepatopancreas b
Haemopoietic cells and blood leukocytes c
Intestinal epithelial cellsd
Hepatopancreas epithelial cells
Mature spore shape and size
Round to sub-spherical
2.34 × 1.83 (± 0.01) fresh
Spherical to ovoid, 1.5 × 0.8 a (fixed)
Oval 1.1 × 0.7 (fresh/percoll-purified)
ovoid to pyriform, 2 × 1 (fixed) c
ellipsoidal 1.6 × 0.8 (ultrathin sections)d
1.3 (± 0.02) × 0.7 (± 0.01) (fixed)
Number of turns and type of polar filament
Isofilar, 5-8 turns (usually a double layer)
4-7 turns (double layer)a
5-6 turns (double layer)b
8-12 turns (single or double layer)c
4-5 turns (double layer) d
4-5 turns (double layer)
Polysporous, without interfacial envelop
Polysporous, without interfacial envelop
Polysporous, without interfacial envelop
Polysporous, without interfacial envelop
Location in host cell
Earliest stage observed
Merogonial plasmodium divides via plasmotomy.
No sporogonial plasmodium present.
Merogonial plasmodium transforms to sporogonial plasmodium without prior division.
Merogonial plasmodium transforms to sporogonial plasmodium without prior division.
Merogonial plasmodium transforms to sporogonial plasmodium without prior division.
The diplokaryotic arrangement of nuclei seen in early merogony in D. lepeophtherii is not seen in the other genera from the Enterocytozoonidae, although it was reported in the initial description of E. bieneusi by Desportes et al., . This early diplokaryotic nuclear formation in E. bieneusi was later rejected by Cali and Owen  who suggested it was an artifact caused by the flattening of the nuclei by adjacent ELIs. An early plasmodial stage of Enterospora sp. has been observed with 'paired nuclei'  but the nuclear arrangement does not appear to be typical of a microsporidian diplokaryon. The lack of complete descriptions of early merogonial stages for some members of the Enterocytozoonidae means that a brief or early diplokaryotic stage in the merogonial development cycle should not be completely ruled out for other members of the family.
All members of the Enterocytozoonidae share certain developmental features. Whilst early merogonial stages have not always been well characterized and remain somewhat contentious, all currently described species develop large sporogonial syncitia in which the polar filament extrusion apparatus forms and develops prior to eventual division to sporoblasts. This precocious development of the polar filament, prior to final division and its association with ELIs in large sporogonial plasmodia, are features that are unique to this family of microsporidia. In the three genera of the family: Enterocytozoon, Nucleospora and Enterospora, the sporogonial plasmodium develops directly from the merogonial plasmodium without division and continues to mature to form the characteristic sporogonial syncitium. This direct transformation is assumed to occur as no division of the multinucleated merogonial stages have been reported for these taxa, only their development and subsequent maturation to sporogonial forms.
Syncitial masses, such as merogonial and sporogonial plasmodia, are large proliferative stages that can occupy a significant proportion of the microsporidian-infected cell, which would make it unlikely for them to be missed during TEM examination of ultrathin sections of infected material. Therefore, it must be concluded that D. lepeophtherii develops without the formation of the sporogonial plasmodium that is typical for the family Enterocytozoonidae. Instead, the merogonial plasmodium divides to form uninucleate sporonts, which undergo a number of nuclear divisions, all of which are followed by cellular division, resulting in a final division to form two sporoblasts. The lack of the formation of the characteristic sporogonial plasmodium in Desmozoon might be considered sufficiently different for it not to be included in the Enterocytozoonidae. However, a precocious development of the polar filament can be found in young divisional sporonts (Fig 4a) and two sets of fully formed extrusion apparatus are sometimes found in large sporoblasts that are presumably yet to divide (Fig 4e). ELIs are also present throughout much of the developmental cycle in Desmozoon, being at their largest during late sporont and early sporoblast formation and reduced or absent in mature spores. Cali and Owen  suggested that the ELIs observed in E. bieneusi were storage vacuoles and probably involved in the formation of the polar filament and other spore structures. The ELIs in Desmozoon develop in close association with cytoplasmic cisternae and the developing polar filament (Fig 4c) supporting this hypothesis. They are also associated with the formation of the posterior vacuole, as they are positioned posteriorly in the developing spore ultimately where the posterior vacuole develops (Fig 4f). The presence of ELIs in Desmozoon during sporogony and the early development of the polar filament seen as early as young divisional sporonts are typical features of the Enterocytozoonidae that are seen in all the described species of the family and suggest that this microsporidian should be placed in the Enterocytozoonidae in spite of the lack of a sporogonial plasmodium.
Although some characteristics are present in all family members, there can be notable differences in the cellular processes involved in their formation. Morphogenesis of the polar filaments proceeds differently in the three described genera of the Enterocytozoonidae. In E. bieneusi a large electron dense body associated with vesiculotubular networks form electron dense disc-like structures (EDDs), which appear throughout the plasmodium and then fuse into arcs forming the polar filament coils [33, 41]. In Nucleospora spp. the polar filament does not coalesce from EDDs but from cylinders or tubular structures that are associated with ribosome rich cytoplasm delimited by the ER cisternae [32, 33]. In Enterospora, multiple spherical membrane-bound vesicles are present throughout the cytoplasm of the plasmodium , which presumably correspond to polar filament precursors and are similar to those seen in E. bieneusi although not as electron dense. The development of the polar filament in D. lepeophtherii is more similar to that of Nucleospora spp. as no typical EDDs develop and the polar filament develops within the cytoplasmic cisternae of ER (Fig 4a). However, the early assembly of the polar filament does not take place in the plasmodium as the merogonial plasmodium divides to form sporonts before being transformed to a sporogonial syncitium in this species.
Mature spores of D. lepeophtherii share many characteristics with those in the Enterocytozoonidae (Table 2). All members of the family have small round to ovoid (sub-spherical) spores, a single nucleus and between 4-8 turns of an isofilar polar filament, usually in a double coil, are polysporous and lack a complete interfacial envelope at all developmental stages.
Molecular phylogenetics of the Enterocytozoonidae
Desmozoon lepeophtherii has been shown to be robustly supported as a member of the Enterocytozoonidae using phylogenetic analyses [, present study]. The Enterocytozoonidae form a small monophyletic group that is part of a larger clade described as being terrestrial in origin, but having evolved from ancestral freshwater microsporidians .
The Enterocytozoonidae has recently increased its size with respect to the number of genera and described species it contains. However, all the new descriptions are from aquatic marine crustacean hosts [3, 4, 14], including that in the present study. Unfortunately there are no DNA sequences available for the genus Enterospora infecting marine crabs, but ultrastructural descriptions adequately placed them in the Enterocytozoonidae. The increasing occurrence of microsporidia infecting crustacea in the Enterocytozoonidae is not unexpected, as a related gut-infecting microsporidian from Daphnia has been shown to be consistently placed as basal to the group [6, 21]. Unfortunately no ultrastructural data is available for this parasite, but a similar microsporidian has been recently further documented from Daphnia populations in European lakes . As more species are described and more gene sequences become available for the Enterocytozoonidae, some of these unresolved phylogenetic issues will hopefully be clarified. But, current phylogenetic analyses suggest that the Enterocytozoonidae is likely to have evolved from a common ancestor infecting a crustacean host. The phylogenetic importance of crustacean-infecting microsporidia in understanding the origins of species like Enterocytozoon bieneusi that infect humans may be significant.
Other ultrastructural features of Desmozoon lepeophtherii in Lepeophtheirus salmonis
Numerous appendages/tubules were observed in the host cell cytoplasm during sporogony (Fig 4a-c). Takvorian and Cali  reviewed the form and function of microsporidian appendages, suggesting four different types. The appendages observed in this study most closely resemble the type I tubules described from Glugea stephani (Hagenmüller, 1899), but, during the present study, evidence that the tubules were continuous with the parasite plasmalemma was not apparent. The function of these appendages remains unknown but they have been suggested to facilitate host-parasite interchange of materials . Microsporidian tubules have not been reported in the Enterocytozoonidae previously. They are rare amongst microsporidia that develop in direct contact with the host cell cytoplasm, but developing stages of both E. bieneusi and E. hepatopenaei have been observed with numerous tubule-like cytoplasmic projections extending into the host cell cytoplasm [14, 33]. The lack of distinct cytoplasmic tubules in other members of the Enterocytozoonidae may be due to the common features of their sporogony resulting in the presence of sporogonial syncitia in all cases. The microsporidian tubules in D. lepeophtherii are only associated with sporogony and are more prominent during early sporogony, particularly in divisional young sporonts which are absent in other members of the family. Furthermore, microsporidian tubules have never been reported for intranuclear microsporidians. Tubule formation is not typically associated with xenoma-forming microsporidia and is more often observed in species that develop complete interfacial envelopes .
The microsporidian infection in L. salmonis does indeed complete its developmental cycle lacking any type of complete interfacial envelope. However, during late sporogony there were membranous secretions regularly observed near the outer surface of sporoblasts, occasionally in multiple layers (Fig 5a-b). These are thought to be parasite-derived secretions as no host cell remnants were associated with them. These membranous secretions were never seen to completely isolate the sporoblast from the host cell cytoplasm and hence cannot be considered an interfacial envelope. The structures were also observed as continuous concentric circular membranous whorls, whose function was not apparent (Fig 5c). These membranous secretions are possibly partially formed parasite derived interfacial envelopes or associated with or derived from the cytoplasmic tubules present during early sporogony. Similar non-persistent parasite derived interfacial envelopes have been reported from Vairimorpha necatrix (Kramer, 1965) where envelopes are formed during sporogony, which only sometimes develop to fully enclose the sporoblasts . Similar membranous structures, described as type IV cytoplasmic tubules, have also been observed in sporophorous vesicles during sporogony in V. necatrix[44, 45].
The intranuclear inclusions observed in infected host cells had an appearance consistent with either crystalline inclusions or viral like particles VLPs  (Fig 5d). Microsporidian infections have previously been associated with simultaneous viral infections. Both Nucleospora and Enterocytozoon have been reported to be associated with retroviral infection of their hosts. Nucleospora salmonis has been found in fish infected with the retrovirus that is believed to be the cause of plasmacytoid leukaemia [47, 48], and E. bieneusi is found predominately in HIV-infected patients, although this is largely accepted as opportunistic infections due to a lowering of the immune status caused by the viral infection . Intranuclear and intracytoplasmic crystalline inclusions are frequently associated with other cell abnormalities such as tumour cells and leukaemic conditions; intranuclear crystalline and paracrystalline inclusions have also been regularly associated with virally infected cells . The VLPs seen in the present study are not thought to be related to the microsporidian infection but could warrant further study.
Phylum: Microsporidia (Balbiani, 1882)
Class: Microsporea (Levine & Corliss, 1963)
Order: Microsporida (Balbiani, 1882)
Family: Enterocytozoonidae (Cali & Owen, 1990)
Spores are round to sub-spherical, with an isofilar polar filament with 5-8 turns in a double layer. Entire development is in direct contact with the host cell cytoplasm. Large xenomas develop from the glycocalyx border that is immediately basal to the epidermal tissue layer beneath the cuticle, and desmocytes are thought to be the most likely host cell infected. Early diplokaryotic meronts develop into large plasmodia, with unpaired nuclei that divide by plasmotomy to form sporonts. During sporogony there is a precocious development of the polar filament extrusion apparatus which is associated with electron lucent inclusions. The polar filament can be fully arranged and well developed prior to the final division to form two sporoblasts. SSU rDNA sequence data is most similar to members of the Nucleospora and its position is robustly supported within the Enterocytozoonidae.
Type host: Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Krøyer) ex Salmo salar L.
Location: Numerous Atlantic salmon farms on the west coast of Scotland.
Type location: Toward Point, Argyll. Grid reference NS 137 672 GB (55° 51' N, 4° 58' W).
Site of infection: Desmocytes associated with the glycocalyx border, basal to the epidermal tissue layer under the cuticle and along haemocoelic divisions.
Etymology: The genus name Desmozoon refers to the cell type infected. Desomcyte: any elongated interstitial cell, as in fibrocyte or fibroblast. The specific name lepeophtherii refers to the generic name of the parasitic copepod host (Lepeophtheirus).
Type material: Two hapantotype ultrathin TEM sections have been submitted to the collections of the Natural History Museum, London, and assigned the accession numbers 2009: 11: 18:1 and 2009: 11: 18: 2
The presence of a diplokaryotic stage during early merogony that undergoes nuclear dissociation and develops to form a merogonial plasmodium that divides to yield uninucleate sporonts has not been observed in the Enterocytozoonidae before. However, the typical family traits of the precocious development of the polar filament and the presence of ELIs were consistently observed, albeit in sporonts instead of a sporogonial plasmodium. Phylogenetic analyses consistently and robustly place Desmozoon lepeophtherii with other members of the Enterocytozoonidae as a monophyletic group, supporting the ultrastructural findings. This study highlights the importance of supplying a SSU rDNA sequence when describing new species of microsporidia. It is increasingly apparent that certain ultrastructural features, such as the diplokaryotic arrangement of nuclei can be lost or gained very rapidly over evolutionary time  and, following such characters leads to unacceptable polyphyletic groupings defined by character states that have evolved separately on numerous occasions and are not derived from a common ancestor . Therefore the use of gene sequences to infer phylogenetic relatedness is extremely valuable and is vital for resolving the higher taxonomic issues in the microsporidia.
These results of this study lead us to the conclusion that the microsporidian hyperparasite of L. salmonis should be included in the Enterocytozoonidae. But, due to the unique ultrastructural features observed, xenoma formation, the novelty of the parasitic copepod host and the 10% sequence divergence seen in the SSU rDNA to its closest relative, that a new genus should be erected; the name Desmozoon lepeophtherii n. gen. n. sp. is proposed.
List of abbreviations
transmission electron microscopy
scanning electron microscopy
- SSU rDNA:
small subunit ribosomal DNA
electron lucent inclusions
electron dense disc-like structures
- Sprague V, Couch J: An annotated list of protozoan parasites, hyperparasites and commensals of decapod crustacea. J Protozool. 1971, 18: 526-537.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Olson RE, Tiekotter KL, Reno PW: Nadelspora canceri n.g., n.s. an unusual microsporidian parasite of the Dungeness crab, Cancer magister. J Euk Microbiol. 1994, 41: 349-359. 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1994.tb06089.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stentiford GD, Bateman KS: Enterospora sp., an intranuclear microsporidian infection of hermit crab Eupagurus bernhardus. Dis Aquat Org. 2007, 75: 61-72. 10.3354/dao075061.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stentiford GD, Bateman KS, Longshaw M, Feist SW: Enterospora canceri n. gen., n. sp., intranuclear within the hepatopancreas of the European edible crab Cancer pagurus. Dis Aquat Org. 2007, 75: 61-72. 10.3354/dao075061.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martinez MA, Vivares CP, Rocha RD, Fonseca AC, Andral B, Bouix G: Microsporidiosis on Artemia (Crustacea, Anostraca) Light and electron microscopy of Vavraia anostraca sp. nov. (Microsporidia: Pleistophoridae) in the Brazilian Solar Salterns. Aquaculture. 1992, 107: 229-237. 10.1016/0044-8486(92)90071-R.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Refardt D, Canning EU, Mathis A, Cheney SA, Lafranchi-Tristem NJ, Ebert D: Small subunit ribosomal DNA phylogeny of microsporidia that infect Daphnia (Crustacea: Cladocera). Parasitology. 2002, 124: 381-389. 10.1017/S0031182001001305.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wolinska J, Giessler S, Koerner H: Molecular identification and hidden diversity of novel Daphnia parasites from European lakes. App Environ Microbiol. 10.1128/AEM.01306-09.
- Diarra K, Toguebaye BS: Ultrastructure of Nosema stenocypris (Diarra & Toguebaye), 1994, a microsporidian parasite of Stenocypris major (Crustacea, Ostracoda, Cyprididae). Archiv Fur Protisten. 1996, 146: 363-367.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lightner DV: A handbook of shrimp pathology and diagnostic procedures for disease control of cultured penaeid shrimp. 1996, Baton Rouge: World Aquaculture SocietyGoogle Scholar
- Azevedo C, Corral L, Vivares CP: Ultrastructure of the microsporidian Inodosporus octospora (Thelohaniidae), a parasite of the shrimp Palaemon serratus (Crustacea, Decapoda). Dis Aquat Org. 2000, 41: 151-158. 10.3354/dao041151.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Azevedo C: Ultrastructural aspects of a new species, Vavraia mediterranica (Microsporidia, Pleistophoridae), parasite of the French Mediterranean shrimp, Crangon crangon (Crustacea, Decapoda). J Invert Path. 2001, 78: 194-200. 10.1006/jipa.2001.5072.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Clotilde-Ba FL, Toguebaye BS: Infection of Penaeus monodon (Fabricius, 1798) (Crustacea, Decapoda, Penaeidae) by Agmasoma penaei (Microspora, Thelohaniidae) in Senegal, West Africa. Bull Eur Ass Fish Pathol. 2001, 21: 157-159.Google Scholar
- Toubiana M, Guelorget O, Bouchereau JL, Lucien-Brun H, Marques A: Microsporidians in penaeid shrimp along the west coast of Madagascar. Dis Aquat Org. 2004, 58: 79-82. 10.3354/dao058079.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tourtip S, Wongtripop S, Stentiford GD, Bateman KS, Sriurairatana S, Chavadej J, Sritunyalucksana K, Withyachumnarnkul B: Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei sp. nov. (Microsporida: Enterocytozoonidae), a parasite of the black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon (Decapoda: Penaeidae): fine structure and phylogenetic relationships. J Invert Path. 2009, 102: 21-29. 10.1016/j.jip.2009.06.004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dunn AM, Terry RS, Smith JE: Transovarial transmission in the microsporidia. Adv Parasitol. 2001, 48: 57-100. full_text.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Freeman MA, Turnbull JF, Yeomans WE, Bean CW: Prospects for management strategies of invasive crayfish populations with an emphasis on biological control. Aquat Conserv, Aug. 2009,Google Scholar
- Kiryu Y, Behringer DC, Landsberg JH, Petty BD: Microsporidiosis in the Caribbean spiny lobster Panulirus argus from southeast Florida, USA. Dis Aquat Org. 2009, 83: 237-242. 10.3354/dao02046.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sprague V, Vavra J: Systematics of the microsporidia. Comparative Pathobiology. Edited by: Bulla LA, Cheng CC. 1977, New York: Plenum Press, 2: 1-510.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Voronin VN: Ultrastructure and horizontal transmission of Gurleya macrocyclopis (Protozoa, Microspora) to Macrocylops albidus (Crustacea, Copepoda). J Invert Path. 1996, 67: 105-107. 10.1006/jipa.1996.0016.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bronnvall AM, Larsson JIR: Ultrastructure and light microscopic cytology of Agglomerata lacrima n. sp. (Microspora, Duboscqiidae) a microsporidian parasite of Acanthocyclops vernalis (Copepoda, Cyclopidae). Eur J Protistol. 2001, 37: 89-101. 10.1078/0932-4739-00808.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Freeman MA, Bell AS, Sommerville C: A hyperparasitic microsporidian infecting the salmon louse, Lepeophtheirus salmonis : an rDNA-based molecular phylogenetic study. J Fish Dis. 2003, 26: 667-676. 10.1046/j.1365-2761.2003.00498.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vavra J, Hyliš M, Obornik M, Vossbrink CR: Microsporidia in aquatic microcrustacea: the copepod Microsporidium Marssoniella elegans Lemmermann, 1990 revisited. Folia Parasitol. 2005, 52: 163-172.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Freeman MA: Potential biological control agents for the salmon louse Lepeophtheirus salmois (Krøyer 1837). PhD thesis. 2002, University of Stirling, Institute of Aquaculture,http://libcat.stir.ac.uk/record=b1313993~S5, [http://hdl.handle.net/1893/1685]Google Scholar
- Durfort M, Vallmitjana L: Ultraestructura de meronts y esporas de Unikaryon mytilicolae (Durfort, Vallmitjana y Vivares, 1980), (Microspora, Unikaryionidae) hiperparasito del copepodo Mytilicola intestinalis, Steuer. Rev Ibér Parasitol. 1982, 42: 143-160.Google Scholar
- Coste F, Bouix G: Two hyperparasitic microsporidia of both trematodes and copepods of teleost fishes [abstract No 107]. 36th Annual meeting of the Groupment des Protistologues de Langue Française (GPLF). J Euk Microbiol. 1999, 46: 14a-Google Scholar
- Andreadis TG: Experimental transmission of a microsporidian pathogen from mosquitoes to an alternate copepod host. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 1985, 82: 5574-5577. 10.1073/pnas.82.16.5574.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Andreadis TG: Ultrastructural characterisation of meiospores of six new species of Amblyospora (Microsporidia: Amblyosporidae) from northern Aedes (Diptera: Culicidae) mosquitoes. J Euk Microbiol. 1994, 41: 147-154. 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1994.tb01488.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vossbrinck CR, Andreadis TG, Vavra J, Becnel JJ: Molecular phylogeny and evolution of mosquito parasitic microsporidia (Microsporidia: Amblyosporidae). J Euk Microbiol. 2004, 51: 88-95. 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2004.tb00167.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Desportes I, Lecharpentier Y, Galian A, Bernard F, Cochandpriollet B, Lavergne A, Ravisse P, Modigliani R: Occurrence of a new microsporidan Enterocytozoon bieneusi n. g. n. sp., in the enterocytes of a human patient with AIDS. J Protozool. 1985, 32: 250-254.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dengjel B, Zahler M, Hermanns W, Heinritzi K, Spillmann T, Thomschke A, Loscher T, Gothe R, Rinder H: Zoonotic potential of Enterocytozoon bieneusi. J Clin Microbiol. 2001, 39: 4495-4499. 10.1128/JCM.39.12.4495-4499.2001.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Santín M, Fayer R: Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotype nomenclature based on the internal transcribed spacer sequence: a consensus. J Euk Microbiol. 2009, 56: 34-38. 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2008.00380.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chilmonczyk S, Cox WT, Hedrick RP: Enterocytozoon salmonis n. sp. an intranuclear microsporidium from salmonid fish. J Protozool. 1991, 38: 264-269.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Desportes-Livage I, Chilmonczyk S, Hedrick R, Ombrouck C, Monge D, Maiga I, Gentilini M: Comparative development of two microsporidian species: Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Enterocytozoon salmonis, reported in AIDS patients and salmonid fish, respectively. J Euk Microbiol. 1996, 43: 49-60. 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1996.tb02472.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lom J, Dyková I: Ultrastructure of Nucleospora secunda n. sp. (Microsporidia), parasite of enterocytes of Nothobranchius rubripinnis. Eur J Protistol. 2002, 38: 19-27. 10.1078/0932-4739-00844.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Spurr AR: A low-viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy. J Ultrastruct Res. 1963, 26: 31-43. 10.1016/S0022-5320(69)90033-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG: The CLUSTAL-X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucl Acids Res. 1997, 24: 4876-4882. 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Saitou N, Nei M: The Neighbour-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987, 4: 406-425.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Swofford DL: PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), v. 4.0 beta10. 2002, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, USAGoogle Scholar
- Bresciani J: The fine ultrastructure of the integument of free-living and parasitic copepods: a review. Acta Zool. 1986, 67: 125-145.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Boxshall GA: Copepoda. Microscopic anatomy of invertebrates: Crustacea. Edited by: Harrison FW, Humes AG. 1992, New York: Wiley-Liss, 9: 347-384.Google Scholar
- Cali A, Owen RL: Intracellular development of Enterocytozoon, a unique microsporidian found in the intestine of AIDS patients. J Protozool. 1990, 37: 145-155.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vossbrinck CR, Debrunner-Vossbrinck AB: Molecular phylogeny of the microsporidia: ecological, ultrastructural and taxonomic considerations. Folia Parasitol. 2005, 52: 131-142.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takvorian PM, Cali A: Appendages associated with Glugea stephani, a microsporidian found in flounder. J Protozool. 1983, 30: 251-256.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mitchell MJ, Cali A: Ultrastructural study of the development of Vairimorpha necatrix (Kramer, 1965) (Protozoa, Microsporidia) in larvae of the corn earworm, Heliothis zea (Boddie) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) with emphasis on sporogony. J Euk Microbiol. 1993, 40: 701-710. 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1993.tb04462.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cali A, Takvorian PM: Developmental morphology and life cycles of the microsporidia. The microsporidia and microsporidiosis. Edited by: Wittner M, Weiss LM. 1999, Washington: ASM Press, 85-128.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ghadially FN: Ultrastructural pathology of the cell and matrix. 1997, Oxford: Butterworth Press, 1: FourthGoogle Scholar
- Eaton WD, Kent ML: A retrovirus in chinook salmon (Onchorhynchus tshawytscha) with plasmacytoid leukemia and evidence for etiology of the disease. Cancer Res. 1992, 52: 6496-6500.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kent ML, Dawe SC: Further evidence for a viral etiology in plasmacytoid leukemia of chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha. Dis Aquat Org. 1993, 15: 115-121. 10.3354/dao015115.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kotler DP, Orenstein JM: Clinical syndromes associated with microsporidiosis. The microsporidia and microsporidiosis. Edited by: Wittner M, Weiss LM. 1999, Washington: ASM Press, 258-292.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.