Dermanyssus gallinae in layer farms in Kosovo: a high risk for salmonella prevalence

  • Afrim Hamidi1Email author,

    Affiliated with

    • Kurtesh Sherifi1,

      Affiliated with

      • Skender Muji1,

        Affiliated with

        • Behlul Behluli1,

          Affiliated with

          • Fatgzim Latifi1,

            Affiliated with

            • Avni Robaj1,

              Affiliated with

              • Rezart Postoli2,

                Affiliated with

                • Claudia Hess3,

                  Affiliated with

                  • Michael Hess3 and

                    Affiliated with

                    • Olivier Sparagano4

                      Affiliated with

                      Parasites & Vectors20114:136

                      DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-4-136

                      Received: 2 June 2011

                      Accepted: 15 July 2011

                      Published: 15 July 2011

                      Abstract

                      Background

                      The poultry red mite (PRM), Dermanyssus gallinae (D.g.) is a serious ectoparasitic pest of poultry and potential pathogen vector. The prevalence of D. g. and the prevalence of Salmonella spp. within mites on infested laying poultry farms were investigated in Kosovo.

                      Findings

                      In total, 14 populated layer farms located in the Southern Kosovo were assessed for D. g. presence. Another two farms in this region were investigated 6 months after depopulation. Investigated flocks were all maintained in cages, a common housing system in Kosovo. A total of eight farms were found to be infested with D. g. (50%) at varying levels, including the two depopulated farms. The detection of Salmonella spp. from D. g. was carried out using PCR. Out of the eight layer farms infested with D. g., Salmonella spp. was present in mites on three farms (37.5%).

                      Conclusions

                      This study confirms the high prevalence of D. g. in layer flocks in Kosovo and demonstrates the link between this mite and the presence of Salmonella spp. on infested farms.

                      Background

                      The PRM D. g. is one of the most serious and widespread pests of poultry production. It is a worldwide ectoparasitic pest [1], showing genetic variation between the UK, France and Italy [2]. D. g. hides in cracks and crevices in poultry units and infests the birds only briefly for blood meals, mainly at night [3]. This haematophagous mite feeds rapidly from its host (in comparison with ticks for example) and can survive several months without a blood-meal. The mites enter poultry houses through open wall fans, wall inlets and air chimneys [4] or are brought by staff, bird cages, crates or wild birds. In recent years, the frequency of D. g. infestations in laying hens has increased in Europe, as has its pest status.

                      D. g. can have a significant economic impact in poultry production by causing a reduction in egg production, loss in body weight of birds, and a reduction of welfare of laying hens [5]. D. g. may also cause dermatitis in humans [6, 7]. Infestation with D. g. can cause irritation and restlessness in affected hens and can even result in the death of birds [8]. It is reported that the death rate among the hens can rise from 1 to 4%, with a reduction in laying performance of up to 10%, as a result of infestation. Downgrading of egg quality in poultry affected by D. g. has also been observed [9, 10].

                      In addition to causing 'direct' losses in poultry production systems, D. g. has also been described as a potential vector of several bacteria and viruses of concern to poultry, among them several food borne pathogens [1114].

                      In order to assess levels of D. g. infestation on farms different mite traps have been evaluated and used as indicators to inform control decisions [15, 16]. Effective options available for control of D. g. are limited [17]. The use of inadequate, ineffective, or even illegal chemicals have been responsible for increases in infestation rates due to the spread of acaricide resistance now common in many countries [1]. Nevertheless, some products are still being developed and used with some success. For example, [18] found that phoxim 50% is an effective acaricide against D. g. with [19] showing the same to be true of spinosad.

                      D. g. is widespread among farms in Kosovo and might cause high economic losses within the national poultry industry.

                      Infestation rate

                      Fourteen populated layer farms (6,000 - 20,000 birds, from 6 to 12 months of age) and two de-populated farms located in Southern Kosovo were investigated for the prevalence of D. g. (Table 1). The 16 farms all had generally poor biosecurity measures, such as lack of traffic control and personal hygiene.
                      Table 1

                      Data on D. g. samples from poultry farms in Kosovo

                      Farm

                      1

                      2

                      3

                      4

                      5

                      6

                      7

                      8

                      nr. of samples

                      10

                      10

                      10

                      10

                      10

                      10

                      10

                      10

                      nr. of PRM/sample

                      50

                      50-100

                      100

                      50

                      50

                      50

                      50-100

                      50-100

                      layers on the farm

                      No

                      Yes

                      Yes

                      Yes

                      Yes

                      Yes

                      Yes

                      No

                      nr. of layers on the farm

                      0*

                      6,000

                      12,000

                      15,000

                      20,000

                      18,000

                      16,000

                      0

                      Salmonella PCR

                      +

                      +

                      -

                      -

                      -

                      -

                      -

                      +

                      *Depopulated more than 6 months before sampling

                      D. g. prevalence was determined using cardboard traps, which were placed into cages, but out of reach of the birds. Traps were left in place for 48 h, after which they were removed and evaluated for the presence of D.g. Ten cardboard traps were used at each farm and combined as a single pooled sample on the day of their collection. Traps, which were positive for D. g., were frozen at - 20°C to kill any mites present. Mite numbers were assessed and the number of individuals (adults, larvae and nymphs) per trap were estimated to the nearest 50.

                      Incidence of Salmonella spp

                      Pooled samples of D. g. adults, nymphs and larvae (of between 50 and 100 mites) from each infested farm (n = 8), were selected in the laboratory and placed into plastic tubes and stored at -20°C. All samples (n = 80) of D. g. were examined for the presence of Salmonella using PCR.

                      Bacterial DNA was extracted using Dneasy Tissue Kit (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Extracted DNA (25 μl/pooled mite sample) was stored at - 20°C. The PCR reaction mixture (25 μl) contained: 5 μl DNA sample, 14.05 μl distilled H2O, 2.5 μl 10xPCR Buffer, 0.75 μl MgCl2 (50 mM), 0.5 μl dNTP (10 mM), 1 μM of each primer and 1.25 U Taq DNA Polymerase. DNA was amplified according to [20]. The 16S rDNA primer sequences were: (forward)5'-TGT TGT GGT TAA TAA CCG CA-3' and (reverse)5'-CAC AAA TCC ATC TCT GGA-3'. PCR amplifications were performed in thermal cycler with a cycling program consisting of a 10 min denaturation step 94 C, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation (1 min, 94°C), annealing (45 s, 55°C) and extention (1 min 30 s, 72°C) and final extention step of 10 min at 72°C [21]. After 35 cycles the amplification product was expected to be 574 base pairs. Amplification products, including their size, were determined by electrophoresis using 2% agarose gels.

                      Results and discussion

                      In total 8 out of 16 farms (50%) were infested with D. g. to varying degrees, where mites were present in both populated and unpopulated units. Out of the eight infested farms, pooled mite samples from three premises were positive for the presence of Salmonella spp. (37.5%). In two cases Salmonella was found in mites 6 months after the removal of layers (Farms 1 and 8). The other Salmonella-positive case was from mites trapped in a populated unit (Farm 2). Results are shown in Table 1.

                      D. g. represents a major problem for the layer industry in Kosovo and across much of the globe. Data from the present study showed that 50% of Kosovan cage rearing systems were infested with D. g., which is comparable to prevalence figures in other countries with free range rearing systems, e.g. France (56%), UK (60%), and Denmark (68%) [1]. A high Salmonella spp. prevalence on infested farms was also observed, which demonstrates that D. g. may at least carry this pathogen potentially serving as vector for its spread in poultry. Such a vectorial role has already been observed under laboratory conditions [22].

                      As mites tested positive for Salmonella spp. in depopulated units, the role that D. g. can play in between-flock transmission of pathogens was also demonstrated by the present study. Salmonella was found within D. g., 6 months after the removal of birds from the infested farm. This further suggests that transovarial transmission of Salmonella by D. g. is a possibility considering that mites do not survive for so long they must have passed the infection to their offspring. These same results show that D. g. can survive long periods of fasting, suggesting that these mites may be capable of pathogen transmission between flocks. Finally, where Salmonella was found in mites present on a populated farm, no signs of clinical Salmonellosis were observed in the birds. This could pose a risk to public health through Salmonella-positive mites being squashed on eggs or when such mites would infect birds.

                      The transfer of D. g. in Kosovo seems to occur via egg boxes which are exchanged at supermarkets, originating from different egg supply companies. In general all farms infested with D. g. in the present study demonstrated poor biosecurity measures. The emerging potential role of D. g. as a vector for Salmonella spp. supported by the results presented in this paper it should encourage the poultry industry to initiate strict biosecurity programs to control both D. g. and any pathogens it may foster, carry or transmit. Assuming that these results are not specific to Kosovo, they could explain why salmonellosis outbreaks are still observed in other countries, such as the UK. Although all birds are vaccinated against Salmonella the prevalence of D. g. is very high in the UK, which could explain why Salmonella transmission can overcome the vaccination effect as different serovars exist.

                      List of Abbreviations

                      D.g.: 

                      Dermanyssus gallinae

                      PRM: 

                      poultry red mite.

                      Declarations

                      Acknowledgements and Funding

                      We thank the ASSO (Austrian Scientific Support Office) and Austrian Federal Ministry for Education for funding of this scientific activity.

                      Authors’ Affiliations

                      (1)
                      Faculty of Agriculture and Veterinary, University of Prishtina
                      (2)
                      Faculty of Veterinary Medicine
                      (3)
                      Clinic for Poultry, Fish and Reptiles, Veterinary Medical University Vienna
                      (4)
                      Northumbria University, School of Life Sciences

                      References

                      1. Sparagano O, Pavliçeviç A, Murano T, Camarda A, Sahibi H, Kilpinen O, Mul M, van Emous R, le Bouquin S, Hoel K, Cafiero MA: Prevalence and key figures for the poultry red mite Dermanyssus gallinae infections in poultry farm systems. Exp Appl Acarol. 2009, 48: 3-10. 10.1007/s10493-008-9233-z.View ArticlePubMed
                      2. Marangi M, Cafiero MA, Capelli G, Camarda A, Sparagano OAE, Giangaspero A: Evaluation of the poultry red mite, Dermanyssus gallinae (Acari: Dermanyssidae) susceptibility to some acaricides in field populations from Italy. Exp Appl Acarol. 2009, 48: 11-18. 10.1007/s10493-008-9224-0.View ArticlePubMed
                      3. Fiddes MD, Le Gresley S, Parsons DG, Epe C, Coles GC, Stafford KA: Prevalence of the poultry red mite (Dermanyssus gallinae) in England. Vet Record. 2005, 157: 233-235.View Article
                      4. Meyer-Kühling B, Heine J, Müller-Lindloff J, Pfister K: Epidemiology of Dermanyssus gallinae and acaricidal efficacy of Phoxim 50% in alternative housing systems during the laying period of hens. Parasitol Res. 2007, 101: S1-S12.View Article
                      5. Chauve C: The poultry red mite Dermanyssus gallinae (De Geer, 1778): current situation and future prospects for control. Vet Parasitol. 1998, 79: 239-245. 10.1016/S0304-4017(98)00167-8.View ArticlePubMed
                      6. Cafiero MA, Camarda A, Circella E: Pseudoscabies caused by Dermanyssus gallinae in Italian city dwellers: a new setting for an old dermatitis. J European Acad Dermatol Venerol. 2008, 22: 1382-1383. 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2008.02645.x.View Article
                      7. Cafiero MA, Camarda A, Circella E, Galante D, Lomuto M: An urban outbreak of red mite dermatitis in Italy. Internat J Dermatol. 2009, 48: 1119-1121. 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2009.04107.x.View Article
                      8. Eckert J, Friedhoff KT, Zahner H, Deplazes P: Lehrbuch der Parasitologie für die Tiermedizin. 2005, Enke Verlag, Stuttgart, 369-371.
                      9. Kirkwood AC: Anaemia in poultry infested with the red mite Dermanyssus gallinae. Vet Records. 1967, 80: 514-516. 10.1136/vr.80.17.514.View Article
                      10. Van Emous RA, Fiks-Van Niekerk TGCM, Mul MF: € 11 million damage for the sector: enquiry into the cost of mites to the poultry industry. De pluimveehouderij. 2006, 35: 8-9.
                      11. Chirico J, Eriksson H, Fossum O, Jansson D: The poultry Red Mite, Dermanyssus gallinae, a potential vector of Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae causing erysipelas in hens. Med Vet Entomol. 2003, 17: 232-234. 10.1046/j.1365-2915.2003.00428.x.View ArticlePubMed
                      12. De Luna CJ, Arkle S, Harrington D, George D, Guy J, Sparagano OAE: The poultry red mite (Dermanyssus gallinae) as a potential carrier of vector-borne diseases. Ann New-York Acad Sc. 2008, 1149: 255-258. 10.1196/annals.1428.085.View Article
                      13. Valiente Moro C, De Luna CJ, Tod A, Guy JH, Sparagano OAE, Zenner L: The poultry red mite (Dermanyssus gallinae): a potential vector of pathogenic agents. Exp Appl Acarol. 2009, 48: 93-104. 10.1007/s10493-009-9248-0.View ArticlePubMed
                      14. Valiente-Moro C, Chauve C, Zenner L: Vectorial role of some dermanyssoid mites (Acari, Mesostigmata, Dermanyssoidea). Parasite. 2005, 12: 99-109.View ArticlePubMed
                      15. Nordenfors H, Chirico J: Evaluation of a sampling trap for Dermanyssus gallinae. J Vet Entomol. 2001, 94: 1617-1621.
                      16. Lundh J, Wiktelius D, Chirico J: Azadirachtin-impregnated traps for the control of Dermanyssus gallinae. Vet Parasitol. 2005, 130: 337-342. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.02.012.View ArticlePubMed
                      17. Siegmann O, Neumann U: Lehrbuch Kompendium der Geflügelkrankheiten. 2005, Schlüttersche, Hannover, 6, aktualisierte erweiterte Auflage, 314-316.
                      18. Meyer-Kühling B, Pfister K, Müller-Lindloff J, Heine J: Field efficacy of phoxim 50% (ByeMite) against the poultry red mite Dermanyssus gallinae in battery cages stocked with laying hens. Vet Parasitol. 2007, 147: 289-296. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.04.012.View ArticlePubMed
                      19. George D, Guy J, Appleby WGC, Knox A, Shiel RS: In vitro and in vivo acaricidal activity and residual toxicity of spinosad to the poultry red mite, Dermanyssus gallinae. Vet Parasitol. 2010, 173: 307-3161. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.06.035.View ArticlePubMed
                      20. Lin C, Tsen H: Use of two 16S DNA targeted oligonucleotides as PCR primers for the specific detection of Salmonella in foods. J Appl Bacteriol. 1996, 80: 659-666.View ArticlePubMed
                      21. Desloire S, Valiente-Moro C, Chauve C, Zenner L: Comparison of four methods of extracting DNA from D. gallinae (Acari: Dermanyssidae). Vet Res. 2006, 37: 725-732. 10.1051/vetres:2006031.View ArticlePubMed
                      22. Valiente Moro C, Chauve C, Zenner L: Experimental infection of Salmonella enteritidis by the poultry red mite, Dermanyssus gallinae. Vet Parasitol. 2007, 146: 329-336. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.02.024.View ArticlePubMed

                      Copyright

                      © Hamidi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

                      This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.