Ixodes scapularis saliva mitigates inflammatory cytokine secretion during Anaplasma phagocytophilum stimulation of immune cells
© Chen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 25 August 2012
Accepted: 6 October 2012
Published: 10 October 2012
Ixodes scapularis saliva enables the transmission of infectious agents to the mammalian host due to its immunomodulatory, anesthetic and anti-coagulant properties. However, how I. scapularis saliva influences host cytokine secretion in the presence of the obligate intracellular rickettsial pathogen Anaplasma phagocytophilum remains elusive.
Bone marrow derived macrophages (BMDMs) were stimulated with pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and A. phagocytophilum. Cytokine secretion was measured in the presence and absence of I. scapularis saliva. Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were also stimulated with Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-α in the presence and absence of I. scapularis saliva and interleukin (IL)-8 was measured.
I. scapularis saliva inhibits inflammatory cytokine secretion by macrophages during stimulation of Toll-like (TLR) and Nod-like receptor (NLR) signaling pathways. The effect of I. scapularis saliva on immune cells is not restricted to murine macrophages because decreasing levels of interleukin (IL)-8 were observed after TNF-α stimulation of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. I. scapularis saliva also mitigates pro-inflammatory cytokine response by murine macrophages during challenge with A. phagocytophilum.
These findings suggest that I. scapularis may inhibit inflammatory cytokine secretion during rickettsial transmission at the vector-host interface.
KeywordsTick Ixodes scapularis Saliva Anaplasma phagocytophilum Rickettsial agent
Hematophagy occurred independently in more than 14,000 arthropod species and this adaptation required physiological, morphological, behavioral and biochemical changes [1, 2]. Salivary gland secretion is among the most common physiological and biochemical adaptation in hematophagous arthropods and salivary proteins from ticks, mosquitoes, biting flies, fleas and other blood-feeding arthropods ensue defense against host homeostasis and inflammation [1–8]. Combating inflammation is particularly problematic for ixodid ticks because these arthropods have to feed for a prolonged period of time and are exposed to a wide range of immune cells [9, 10]. Pioneering studies have characterized the physiology of tick salivary glands  and raised the importance of saliva as an instrumental force for immune evasion [12–15]. Several groups have demonstrated that both proteinaceous and non-proteinaceous components of tick saliva impair the complement system and the function of macrophages, dendritic, T and B cells [8, 16–25]. From these studies it also became apparent that pathogens take advantage of the immunomodulatory properties of vector saliva to colonize the host.
Titus and Ribeiro were the first researchers to describe the role of arthropod salivary glands facilitating parasite transmission. In this seminal work, the authors showed that sandfly salivary glands facilitate Leishmania spp. transmission to the mammalian host . Subsequent studies by many other groups demonstrated that the saliva of arthropod vectors potentiates the transmission of a wide-range of arthropod-borne pathogens, including bacteria, viruses and protozoal organisms. For example, in Ixodes spp., Borrelia burgdorferi outer surface protein C (OspC) binds to salivary protein 15 (Salp15), which then acts as a barrier to protect this spirochete against the host immune response . Sialostatin L2, an I. scapularis cystatin protein also facilitates the growth of the Lyme disease agent B. burgdorferi. In addition, I. ricinus saliva inhibits interferon and Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling during cell stimulation with B. afzelli[29, 30]. Finally, infection by the tick-borne encephalitis virus can be prevented by immunizing animals against a truncated recombinant form of a tick salivary protein named 64P .
Anaplasma phagocytophilum is a pathogen transmitted by ixodid ticks and causes human granulocytic anaplasmosis, an emerging infectious disease in the United States, Europe and Asia . However, it remains mostly unknown whether tick saliva inhibits cytokine secretion by macrophages during stimulation with A. phagocytophilum. Macrophages were recently shown to be important for defense against A. phagocytophilum colonization . In this study, we show that I. scapularis saliva inhibits extracellular and intracellular receptor signaling in both murine and human immune cells. We also demonstrate that tick saliva mitigates A. phagocytophilum-induced cytokine secretion by murine macrophages. This report expands previous scientific knowledge on the immunomodulatory properties of tick saliva and suggests that rickettsial agents may use I. scapularis saliva to inhibit inflammation at the vector-host interface.
Blood samples were obtained from healthy, non-pregnant adults. This procedure was approved by the Human Research Review Board (HRRB number: HS-08-135) at the University of California-Riverside. All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC number: A-20110030BE) at the University of California-Riverside. We used C57BL/6 mice at 6–10 weeks of age purchased from Jackson Laboratories. Experimentation with A. phagocytophilum (HZ strain) was approved by the Biological Use Authorization Committee (BUA number: 20120020) at the University of California-Riverside. A. phagocytophilum was grown in HL-60 cells (ATCC CCL-240). HL-60 cells were maintained in Iscove’s Modified Dulbecco’s Media (IMDM) with L-glutamine and hydroxyethyl piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) (Thermo Scientific), 20% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Sigma) in 5% CO2 and humidified air at 37°C, as previously described .
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), Pam3CSK4, Zymosan, Porphyromonas gingivalis (PG)-LPS and muramyl dipeptide (MDP) were obtained from Invivogen. DOTAP was obtained from Roche. Human recombinant TNF-α was purchased from R&D Systems.
Cell isolation and tick saliva collection
The generation of bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) and tick saliva has been previously described [33–35]. Briefly, mouse femurs were flushed and bone marrow cells were differentiated in complete Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) (Fisher) supplemented with 30% L929 cell-conditioned media, 10% FBS and 1% PSA (100 U/mL penicillin, 100 mg/ml streptomycin, and 0.25μg/ml amphotericin) (Fisher). Cells were cultured at 37°C in a 5% CO2 tissue culture incubator for 5–6 days, with media changed on day 3. Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated by using the Polymorphprep protocol (Axis Shield).
We collected I. scapularis saliva 4–5 days after feeding because studies suggest that transmission of A. phagocytophilum initiates slowly between 24 and 48 hours and is enhanced during rapid feeding to repletion around 72 h–96 h post tick attachment [36–38]. Therefore, saliva from I. scapularis would reflect actual conditions during A. phagocytophilum transmission at the vector-host interface. In addition, I. scapularis saliva collection at 24–48 hours is technically very challenging. The alternative would be using salivary glands. However, salivary glands bring a technical artifact to the system because this organ in ticks is rich in intracellular proteins and other immune effectors such as nucleotides, which may skew cytokine response in immune cells. To isolate vector saliva, I. scapularis ticks were allowed to feed on New Zealand white rabbits. A restraining collar was placed around the neck of each rabbit, and their ears were covered prior to tick exposure. Ticks were permitted to engorge for 4–5 days on the ear of a rabbit. Upon harvesting, ticks were rinsed in distilled water and were immediately fixed to glass slides with double-sided tape. A sterile glass micropipette was placed around the hypostome to collect saliva. Salivation was induced by the application of pilocarpine to the scutum of the tick. Saliva was pooled and stored at −80°C for use.
Immune cell stimulation
BMDMs from C57BL/6 mice were stimulated with the TLR agonists LPS (500 ng/ml), Pam3CSK4 (1 μg/ml), Zymosan (10 μg/ml) and PG- LPS (500 ng/ml), the Nod2 stimulant MDP (10 μg/ml) or A. phagocytophilum (multiplicity of infection (MOI) 10 and 50) at indicated dilutions of tick saliva. Human PBMCs were purified by using the Polymorphprep protocol (Axis Shield), plated for 2 hours and incubated with tick saliva for 30 minutes followed by 4 hours of stimulation with 100 ng/ml of Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-α. Pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, interleukin (IL)-12p40, IL-6 and IL-1β or the chemokine IL-8 (CXCL8) were measured by ELISA.
Mouse TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 and human IL-8 were measured with the BD OptEIA Set from BD Biosciences. Mouse IL-12p40 was measured with capture and detection antibodies from eBiosciences. For the ELISA assays, wells were coated with recommended capture antibody dilutions in freshly prepared coating buffer (0.1 M sodium carbonate, pH 9.5). Plates were sealed and incubated overnight at 4°C followed by aspiration. Wells were then washed 3 times with ≥ 300 μL/well of freshly prepared wash buffer (phosphate buffered saline (PBS) with 0.05% Tween-20). After the last wash, plates were inverted and blotted on absorbent paper to remove any residual buffer. Wells were then blocked with ≥ 200 μL/well of assay diluent (PBS with 10% FBS, pH 7.0) and incubated at room temperature for 1 hour. Plates were washed 3 times with wash buffer. Then, standards and sample dilutions were prepared in assay diluent, as recommended (BD Biosciences). 100 μL of samples and standards were pipetted into the wells, incubated for 2 hours at room temperature followed by 5 washes. 100 μL of detection antibodies were diluted in assay diluent and added to each well. Plates were sealed and incubated for 1 hour at room temperature. Plates were washed 5 times. Then, 100 μL of enzyme reagent (BD OptEIA Set from BD Biosciences) were diluted in assay diluent, pipetted into each well and incubated for 30 minutes at room temperature. Wells were aspirated and washed 7 times with wash buffer. 100 μL of substrate solution (BD OptEIA Set from BD Biosciences) were added to each well and incubated for 30 minutes (without plate sealer) at room temperature in the dark. 50 μL of 2 N H2SO4 was added to each well. Absorbance was read in the ELISA plate reader (Bio-Rad) at 450 nm within 30 minutes. Background was corrected by reading the subtract absorbance at 570 nm.
Cell death assay
Cell death was assayed by measuring lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), as recommended by the manufacturer (Takara). Briefly, 100 μL of each sample was placed into a well. Then, a catalyst solution (Takara) was added to the samples and controls. Samples were incubated for 10–30 minutes, at room temperature, protected from light. Reactions were stopped at the end of the incubation period by adding 50 μL of 1 N HCl. Absorbance was measured at 490 nm. The iMark microplate absorbance reader (Bio-Rad) was used according to the manufacturer’s instruction.
Data were expressed as means ± standard errors of the means (SEM). The following parametric analyses were used: unpaired Student’s t test (two-group comparisons); one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (comparisons of three or more groups); Bonferroni post hoc multiple-comparison tests were used following ANOVA. All statistical calculations were performed using GraphPad Prism version 5.04. Graphs were made using GraphPad Prism version 5.04. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
I. scapularis saliva diminishes inflammatory cytokine secretion by murine macrophages
I. scapularis saliva inhibits chemokine secretion by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells
I. scapularis saliva lessens inflammatory cytokine secretion by murine macrophages during A. phagocytophilum stimulation
Overall, the inhibitory effect of tick saliva on cytokine secretion by BMDMs during A. phagocytophilum stimulation was best observed at a 1:150 dilution (v/v). Experiments performed with tick saliva at a 1:300 dilution (v/v) also showed reduction of cytokine secretion by BMDMs during A. phagocytophilum stimulation (Figure 5). However, the effect was milder (although statistically significant) for IL-6 and IL-12p40 (Figure 5A and B). We did not detect a dilution effect on TNF-α secretion by BMDMs at a 1:300 dilution (v/v) (Figure 5C). These results suggest that the inhibition threshold for tick saliva on TNF-α secretion by BMDMs during A. phagocytophilum stimulation is greater than 1:300 (v/v) compared to 1:150 dilution (v/v). It is unclear why more concentrated tick saliva is required to inhibit cytokine secretion during A. phagocytophilum stimulation when compared to individual TLR or NLR agonists. We reasoned that the presence of multiple PAMPs in a pathogen, such as A. phagocytophilum, may require a stronger dose of tick saliva to mitigate cytokine secretion by BMDMs.
I. scapularis saliva inhibits IL-1β secretion by murine macrophages during A. phagocytophilum stimulation
A dogma has emerged in the last few years in which the production and release of IL-1β are the result of a two-tier system: one signal is induced by pattern recognition receptors or pro-inflammatory cytokines, which activates the transcription and translation of IL-1β via the transcription factor nuclear factor (NF)-κB. This signal is also referred to as priming and it is typically done by LPS stimulation of immune cells. The second signal is mediated by the inflammasome, a protein scaffold that cleaves IL-1β into its mature form through caspase-1 activation [41–43]. Our studies show that IL-1β secretion triggered by A. phagocytophilum during BMDM stimulation does not require LPS priming. To the contrary, LPS priming in BMDMs before A. phagocytophilum stimulation inhibited IL-1β secretion in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 6A). These results are consistent with the lack of genes for LPS and peptidoglycan synthesis in the A. phagocytophilum genome  and suggest that molecules other than LPS may prime BMDMs for the production of pro-IL-1β. Further, tick saliva inhibited A. phagocytophilum-induced IL-1β secretion by BMDMs (Figure 6B). IL-1β secretion may be coupled to a cell death phenomenon named pyroptosis . We did not detect high levels of cell death during A. phagocytophilum stimulation of BMDMs in the absence of tick saliva (~10-15%) (Figure 6C). However, this is not entirely surprising, as A. phagocytophilum does not cause much cell death during infection [32, 46]. Based on these findings, we conclude that in the A. phagocytophilum model, cytokine secretion is a better indicator of the anti-inflammatory features of tick saliva when compared to cell death.
Inflammation is characterized by complex interactions between innate and adaptive immunity . Pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines recruit immune cells to the site of tick feeding. Tick salivary proteins then mitigate the secretion of cytokines by immune cells, thereby, diminishing inflammation [1, 2, 4]. Despite significant progress in the past decades, how ectoparasites, such as ticks, regulate host innate immune signaling during transmission of the rickettsial agent A. phagocytophilum to the mammalian host remains mostly elusive. In this study, we demonstrate that I. scapularis saliva has the ability to inhibit cytokine secretion by murine and human immune cells. These findings are supported by our results showing that extracellular and cytosolic stimulation of macrophages with PAMPs can be inhibited by I. scapularis saliva. We also performed experiments with A. phagocytophilum and demonstrated that similar mitigation effects occur in macrophages. The implications for these findings are wide in scope as ticks, mosquitoes, biting flies, fleas and blood-feeding bugs have also evolved similar strategies for modulating host defenses .
We reported an effect of tick saliva on TLR and NLR signaling in macrophages. Although the effect of tick saliva was previously demonstrated during TLR stimulation of dendritic cells [29, 30, 48–50], whether I. scapularis saliva affects the response to stimulation of murine macrophages and human peripheral blood mononuclear cells had not been determined. Macrophages and peripheral blood mononuclear cells are important because these immune cells respond to A. phagocytophilum infection [33, 51]. To our knowledge, we describe for the first time that secretion of IL-6 and IL-12p40 after stimulation with the Nod2 ligand MDP was diminished in macrophages during treatment with tick saliva. Nod2 has emerged as a critical regulator for immunity and inflammation since it activates canonical and non-canonical NF-κB signaling, mitogen-activated protein kinases, cytokines, chemokines and antimicrobial reactive oxygen species .
Previously, we showed that A. phagocytophilum is partially recognized by the NLRC4 inflammasome , a protein scaffold that regulates the secretion of IL-1β and IL-18 . We also demonstrated that mice deficient in caspase-1 and asc, essential components of the inflammasome, were more susceptible than wild-type animals to A. phagocytophilum infection. These findings were due to the absence of IL-18 secretion and reduced interferon (IFN)-γ levels in the peripheral blood. It is unclear how I. scapularis saliva regulates IL-1β secretion by macrophages during A. phagocytophilum stimulation. However, it is possible that multiple salivary proteins regulate IL-1β secretion during hematophagy. Ticks have large genomes and carry many gene paralogs . These gene paralogs may act redundantly to provide inhibition of immune protein scaffolds in the mammalian host. Two earlier articles provided experimental support for this hypothesis. Ramachandra and Wikel showed that salivary gland extracts from the tick Dermacentor andersoni reduced IL-1 levels during the early phases of tick feeding , whereas Fuchsberger et al., 1995 determined that human IL-1β secretion was mitigated when treated with LPS and salivary gland extracts from partially fed adult female Rhipicephalus appendiculatus.
In addition, A. phagocytophilum may need redundant mechanisms of innate immune recognition to trigger IL-1β secretion. Secretion of IL-1β requires NF-κB activation to generate pro-IL-1β [56, 57]. Dumler and colleagues demonstrated that A. phagocytophilum triggers TLR2 activation during immune cell stimulation . TLR activation is known to initiate NF-κB signaling in immune cells . More recently, our group participated in a study showing that receptor interacting protein-2 (RIP2) affects A. phagocytophilum infection in mice . RIP2 is an adaptor molecule for the innate immune receptors Nod1/2, which also regulates NF-κB signaling . Finally, assembly of a multi-protein complex coined “inflammasome” is critical for IL-1β secretion [56, 57]. We previously demonstrated that the inflammasome is critical for immunity against A. phagocytophilum infection . Taken together, our findings reinforce the notion that A. phagocytophilum immunity is multi-factorial, and suggests a holistic inhibitory effect of tick saliva on innate immunity. This is important because a pathogen such as A. phagocytophilum may need multiple layers of immune evasion during transmission. Therefore, the holistic properties of tick saliva may be a major strategy of host immune evasion during pathogen transmission.
The above hypothesis is supported by several lines of evidence. Post-genomic approaches show that A. phagocytophilum actively modulates gene expression in ticks [62, 63]. Recently, the P11 salivary protein was shown to be required for A. phagocytophilum migration from hemocytes to the salivary glands in ticks . Another salivary gland protein named SALP16 was deemed important for A. phagocytophilum survival within the tick vector . A. phagocytophilum alters the monomeric/filamentous (G/F) actin ratio leading to the translocation of phosphorylated/G-actin to the nucleus . This event affects salp16 gene transcription in association with the RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) and the TATA-binding protein. Fikrig and colleagues have also demonstrated that A. phagocytophilum appears to increase the ability of I. scapularis to survive in cold temperatures by up-regulating an antifreeze glycoprotein  and α1, 3- fucosyltransferases, which are important for pathogen colonization . On the other hand, the Janus kinase (JAK)-signaling transducer activator of transcription (STAT) pathway seems to be important for the restriction of A. phagocytophilum infection in ticks. Clearly, further studies are necessary to determine the contribution of salivary proteins to A. phagocytophilum pathogenesis and immunity.
Elucidating the underlying effect of tick saliva in vivo should be considered a high-priority in tick research. Several experiments show that findings obtained in vitro may sometimes differ from those occurring in vivo, and mRNA and protein levels do not necessarily correlate well . In vivo characterization of tick salivary proteins, however, is not a trivial task. The presence of multiple paralogues in the I. scapularis genome  make the use of siRNA or dsRNA technology challenging because of known off-target effects . Another technical limitation is the lack of strategies to introduce and/or delete genes in ticks. Thereby, we were unable to generate knock-out, knock-in or transgenic I. scapularis. The development of this technology would enable researchers to characterize tick salivary proteins and clarify underlying events at the vector-pathogen-host interface. Despite all these technical restrictions, we posit that I. scapularis saliva may inhibit cytokine secretion during rickettsial transmission. We look forward with reasonable confidence that our findings may be used as a prelude for future in-vivo experimentation.
To facilitate blood-feeding habits and counteract homeostasis and inflammation in the host, arthropod vectors have evolved a sophisticated pharmacological portfolio. Our studies add to a continuum of research over the past 20–30 years and show that I. scapularis saliva diminishes cytokine secretion by mouse and human immune cells during TLR and NLR stimulation. We also show that cytokine response by macrophages is diminished in the presence of I. scapularis saliva during A. phagocytophilum stimulation. Taken together, our findings should pave the ground for new research directions in the field of A. phagocytophilum pathogenesis and immunity and may have direct implications for understanding how ticks circumvent defenses promoted by the mammalian immune system.
Tumor Necrosis Factor
Pathogen Associated Molecular Patterns
Bone marrow-derived macrophages
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells.
We acknowledge Sukanya Narasimhan and Kathy DePonte for providing tick saliva. This work was supported by a cooperative agreement K01 CK000101 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the initial complement provided by the University of California (to JHFP), public health service grant R01 AI093653 (to JHFP), an International Graduate Student Fellowship awarded by the American Association of University Women (to MSS), a Jan Evangelista Purkyne fellowship of the National Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic and a Marie Curie Reintegration grant of the EU-FP7 (PIRG07-GA-2010-268177) (to MK).
- Francischetti IM, Sa-Nunes A, Mans BJ, Santos IM, Ribeiro JM: The role of saliva in tick feeding. Front Biosci. 2009, 14: 2051-2088.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fontaine A, Diouf I, Bakkali N, Misse D, Pages F, Fusai T, Rogier C, Almeras L: Implication of haematophagous arthropod salivary proteins in host-vector interactions. Parasit Vectors. 2011, 4: 187-10.1186/1756-3305-4-187.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Andersen JF: Structure and mechanism in salivary proteins from blood-feeding arthropods. Toxicon. 2010, 56 (7): 1120-1129. 10.1016/j.toxicon.2009.11.002.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chmelar J, Calvo E, Pedra JH, Francischetti IM, Kotsyfakis M: Tick salivary secretion as a source of antihemostatics. J Proteomics. 2012, 75 (13): 3842-3854. 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.04.026.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Valenzuela JG: Exploring tick saliva: from biochemistry to ‘sialomes’ and functional genomics. Parasitology. 2004, 129 (Suppl): S83-S94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Paesen GC, Adams PL, Nuttall PA, Stuart DL: Tick histamine-binding proteins: lipocalins with a second binding cavity. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000, 1482 (1–2): 92-101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dai J, Narasimhan S, Zhang L, Liu L, Wang P, Fikrig E: Tick histamine release factor is critical for Ixodes scapularis engorgement and transmission of the Lyme disease agent. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6 (11): e1001205-10.1371/journal.ppat.1001205.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hovius JW, Levi M, Fikrig E: Salivating for knowledge: potential pharmacological agents in tick saliva. PLoS Med. 2008, 5 (2): e43-10.1371/journal.pmed.0050043.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brossard M, Wikel SK: Tick immunobiology. Parasitology. 2004, 129 (Suppl): S161-S176.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Titus RG, Bishop JV, Mejia JS: The immunomodulatory factors of arthropod saliva and the potential for these factors to serve as vaccine targets to prevent pathogen transmission. Parasite Immunol. 2006, 28 (4): 131-141.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bowman AS, Sauer JR: Tick salivary glands: function, physiology and future. Parasitology. 2004, 129 (Suppl): S67-S81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaufman WR: Tick-host interaction: a synthesis of current concepts. Parasitol Today. 1989, 5 (2): 47-56. 10.1016/0169-4758(89)90191-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ribeiro JM: Role of saliva in tick/host interactions. Exp Appl Acarol. 1989, 7 (1): 15-20. 10.1007/BF01200449.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nuttall PA: Displaced tick-parasite interactions at the host interface. Parasitology. 1998, 116 (Suppl): S65-S72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wikel SK: Tick modulation of host immunity: an important factor in pathogen transmission. Int J Parasitol. 1999, 29 (6): 851-859. 10.1016/S0020-7519(99)00042-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bowman AS, Dillwith JW, Sauer JR: Tick salivary prostaglandins: Presence, origin and significance. Parasitol Today. 1996, 12 (10): 388-396. 10.1016/0169-4758(96)10061-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oliveira CJ, Sa-Nunes A, Francischetti IM, Carregaro V, Anatriello E, Silva JS, Santos IK, Ribeiro JM, Ferreira BR: Deconstructing tick saliva: non-protein molecules with potent immunomodulatory properties. J Biol Chem. 2011, 286 (13): 10960-10969. 10.1074/jbc.M110.205047.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Valenzuela JG, Charlab R, Mather TN, Ribeiro JM: Purification, cloning, and expression of a novel salivary anticomplement protein from the tick, Ixodes scapularis. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275 (25): 18717-18723. 10.1074/jbc.M001486200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schuijt TJ, Coumou J, Narasimhan S, Dai J, Deponte K, Wouters D, Brouwer M, Oei A, Roelofs JJ, van Dam AP: A tick mannose-binding lectin inhibitor interferes with the vertebrate complement cascade to enhance transmission of the Lyme disease agent. Cell Host Microbe. 2011, 10 (2): 136-146. 10.1016/j.chom.2011.06.010.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ashish J, Garg R, Boone CD, Anguita J, Krueger JK, IJ : Conformational rearrangement within the soluble domains of the CD4 receptor is ligand-specific. J Biol Chem. 2008, 283 (5): 2761-2772.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Juncadella IJ, Garg R, Ananthnarayanan SK, Yengo CM, Anguita J: T-cell signaling pathways inhibited by the tick saliva immunosuppressor, Salp15. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2007, 49 (3): 433-438. 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2007.00223.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Garg R, Juncadella IJ, Ramamoorthi N, Ashish Ananthanarayanan SK, Thomas V, Rincon M, Krueger JK, Fikrig E, Yengo CM: CD4 is the receptor for the tick saliva immunosuppressor, Salp15. J Immunol. 2006, 177 (10): 6579-6583.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Anguita J, Ramamoorthi N, Hovius JW, Das S, Thomas V, Persinski R, Conze D, Askenase PW, Rincon M, Kantor FS: Salp15, an Ixodes scapularis salivary protein, inhibits CD4(+) T cell activation. Immunity. 2002, 16 (6): 849-859. 10.1016/S1074-7613(02)00325-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hovius JW, de Jong MA, den Dunnen J, Litjens M, Fikrig E, van der Poll T, Gringhuis SI, Geijtenbeek TB: Salp15 binding to DC-SIGN inhibits cytokine expression by impairing both nucleosome remodeling and mRNA stabilization. PLoS Pathog. 2008, 4 (2): e31-10.1371/journal.ppat.0040031.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hannier S, Liversidge J, Sternberg JM, Bowman AS: Characterization of the B-cell inhibitory protein factor in Ixodes ricinus tick saliva: a potential role in enhanced Borrelia burgdoferi transmission. Immunology. 2004, 113 (3): 401-408. 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2004.01975.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Titus RG, Ribeiro JM: Salivary gland lysates from the sand fly Lutzomyia longipalpis enhance Leishmania infectivity. Science. 1988, 239 (4845): 1306-1308. 10.1126/science.3344436.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ramamoorthi N, Narasimhan S, Pal U, Bao F, Yang XF, Fish D, Anguita J, Norgard MV, Kantor FS, Anderson JF: The Lyme disease agent exploits a tick protein to infect the mammalian host. Nature. 2005, 436 (7050): 573-577. 10.1038/nature03812.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kotsyfakis M, Horka H, Salat J, Andersen JF: The crystal structures of two salivary cystatins from the tick Ixodes scapularis and the effect of these inhibitors on the establishment of Borrelia burgdorferi infection in a murine model. Mol Microbiol. 2010, 77 (2): 456-470. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07220.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lieskovska J, Kopecky J: Effect of tick saliva on signalling pathways activated by TLR-2 ligand and Borrelia afzelii in dendritic cells. Parasite Immunol. 2012, 34 (8–9): 421-429.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lieskovska J, Kopecky J: Tick saliva suppresses IFN signalling in dendritic cells upon Borrelia afzelii infection. Parasite Immunol. 2012, 34 (1): 32-39. 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2011.01345.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Labuda M, Trimnell AR, Lickova M, Kazimirova M, Davies GM, Lissina O, Hails RS, Nuttall PA: An antivector vaccine protects against a lethal vector-borne pathogen. PLoS Pathog. 2006, 2 (4): e27-10.1371/journal.ppat.0020027.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Severo MS, Stephens KD, Kotsyfakis M, Pedra JH: Anaplasma phagocytophilum: deceptively simple or simply deceptive?. Future Microbiol. 2012, 7 (6): 719-731. 10.2217/fmb.12.45.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen G, Severo MS, Sakhon OS, Choy A, Herron MJ, Felsheim RF, Wiryawan H, Liao J, Johns JL, Munderloh UG: Anaplasma phagocytophilum LPDA1 affects host-derived immunopathology during microbial colonization. Infect Immun. 2012, 80 (9): 3194-3205. 10.1128/IAI.00532-12.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eisenbarth SC, Colegio OR, O’Connor W, Sutterwala FS, Flavell RA: Crucial role for the Nalp3 inflammasome in the immunostimulatory properties of aluminium adjuvants. Nature. 2008, 453 (7198): 1122-1126. 10.1038/nature06939.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ribeiro JM, Zeidner NS, Ledin K, Dolan MC, Mather TN: How much pilocarpine contaminates pilocarpine-induced tick saliva?. Med Vet Entomol. 2004, 18 (1): 20-24. 10.1111/j.0269-283X.2003.0469.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Katavolos P, Armstrong PM, Dawson JE, Telford SR: Duration of tick attachment required for transmission of granulocytic ehrlichiosis. J Infect Dis. 1998, 177 (5): 1422-1425. 10.1086/517829.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hodzic E, Fish D, Maretzki CM, De Silva AM, Feng S, Barthold SW: Acquisition and transmission of the agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis by Ixodes scapularis ticks. J Clin Microbiol. 1998, 36 (12): 3574-3578.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vignes-des F, Piesman J, Heffernan R, Schulze TL, Fish D, Stafford KC: Effect of tick removal on transmission of Borrelia burgdorferi and Ehrlichia phagocytophila by Ixodes scapularis nymphs. J Infect Dis. 2001, 183 (5): 773-778. 10.1086/318818.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ting JP, Duncan JA, Lei Y: How the noninflammasome NLRs function in the innate immune system. Science. 2010, 327 (5963): 286-290. 10.1126/science.1184004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sun SC: The noncanonical NF-κB pathway. Immunol Rev. 2012, 246 (1): 125-140. 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2011.01088.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tiemi Shio M, Eisenbarth SC, Savaria M, Vinet AF, Bellemare MJ, Harder KW, Sutterwala FS, Bohle DS, Descoteaux A, Flavell RA: Malarial hemozoin activates the NLRP3 inflammasome through Lyn and Syk kinases. PLoS Pathog. 2009, 5 (8): e1000559-10.1371/journal.ppat.1000559.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schroder K, Zhou R, Tschopp J: The NLRP3 inflammasome: a sensor for metabolic danger?. Science. 2010, 327 (5963): 296-300. 10.1126/science.1184003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Latz E: The inflammasomes: mechanisms of activation and function. Curr Opin Immunol. 2010, 22 (1): 28-33. 10.1016/j.coi.2009.12.004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hotopp JC, Lin M, Madupu R, Crabtree J, Angiuoli SV, Eisen JA, Seshadri R, Ren Q, Wu M, Utterback TR: Comparative genomics of emerging human ehrlichiosis agents. PLoS Genet. 2006, 2 (2): e21-10.1371/journal.pgen.0020021.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Strowig T, Henao-Mejia J, Elinav E, Flavell R: Inflammasomes in health and disease. Nature. 2012, 481 (7381): 278-286. 10.1038/nature10759.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rikihisa Y: Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Ehrlichia chaffeensis: subversive manipulators of host cells. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010, 8 (5): 328-339. 10.1038/nrmicro2318.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Newton K, Dixit VM: Signaling in innate immunity and inflammation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2012, 4 (3): 1-19.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Oliveira CJ, Carvalho WA, Garcia GR, Gutierrez FR, Silva JS, Ferreira BR, de Miranda Santos IK: Tick saliva induces regulatory dendritic cells: MAP-kinases and Toll-like receptor-2 expression as potential targets. Vet Parasitol. 2009, 167: 288-297.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cavassani KA, Aliberti JC, Dias AR, Silva JS, Ferreira BR: Tick saliva inhibits differentiation, maturation and function of murine bone-marrow-derived dendritic cells. Immunology. 2005, 114 (2): 235-245. 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2004.02079.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sa-Nunes A, Bafica A, Lucas DA, Conrads TP, Veenstra TD, Andersen JF, Mather TN, Ribeiro JM, Francischetti IM: Prostaglandin E2 is a major inhibitor of dendritic cell maturation and function in Ixodes scapularis saliva. J Immunol. 2007, 179 (3): 1497-1505.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim HY, Rikihisa Y: Roles of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase, NF-κB, and protein kinase C in proinflammatory cytokine mRNA expression by human peripheral blood leukocytes, monocytes, and neutrophils in response to Anaplasma phagocytophila. Infect Immunity. 2002, 70 (8): 4132-4141. 10.1128/IAI.70.8.4132-4141.2002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pedra JH, Sutterwala FS, Sukumaran B, Ogura Y, Qian F, Montgomery RR, Flavell RA, Fikrig E: ASC/PYCARD and caspase-1 regulate the IL-18/IFN-γ axis during Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection. J Immunol. 2007, 179 (7): 4783-4791.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pagel Van Zee J, Geraci NS, Guerrero FD, Wikel SK, Stuart JJ, Nene VM, Hill CA: Tick genomics: the Ixodes genome project and beyond. Int J Parasitol. 2007, 37 (12): 1297-1305. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2007.05.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ramachandra RN, Wikel SK: Modulation of host-immune responses by ticks (Acari: Ixodidae): effect of salivary gland extracts on host macrophages and lymphocyte cytokine production. J Med Entomol. 1992, 29 (5): 818-826.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fuchsberger N, Kita M, Hajnicka V, Imanishi J, Labuda M, Nuttall PA: Ixodid tick salivary gland extracts inhibit production of lipopolysaccharide-induced mRNA of several different human cytokines. Exp Appl Acarol. 1995, 19 (11): 671-676. 10.1007/BF00145255.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Franchi L, Munoz-Planillo R, Nunez G: Sensing and reacting to microbes through the inflammasomes. Nature Immunol. 2012, 13 (4): 325-332. 10.1038/ni.2231.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Davis BK, Wen H, Ting JP: The inflammasome NLRs in immunity, inflammation, and associated diseases. Annu Rev Immunol. 2011, 29: 707-735. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-031210-101405.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Choi KS, Scorpio DG, Dumler JS: Anaplasma phagocytophilum ligation to toll-like receptor (TLR) 2, but not to TLR4, activates macrophages for nuclear factor-κB nuclear translocation. J Infect Dis. 2004, 189 (10): 1921-1925. 10.1086/386284.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schroder K, Tschopp J: The inflammasomes. Cell. 2010, 140 (6): 821-832. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.040.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sukumaran B, Ogura Y, Pedra JH, Kobayashi KS, Flavell RA, Fikrig E: Receptor interacting protein-2 contributes to host defense against Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection. FEMS Immunol Med M. 2012, 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2012.01001.x..Google Scholar
- Sorbara MT, Philpott DJ: Peptidoglycan: a critical activator of the mammalian immune system during infection and homeostasis. Immunol Rev. 2011, 243 (1): 40-60. 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2011.01047.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mastronunzio JE, Kurscheid S, Fikrig E: Post-genomic analyses reveal development of infectious Anaplasma phagocytophilum during transmission from ticks to mice. J Bacteriol. 2012, 194 (9): 2238-2247. 10.1128/JB.06791-11.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Munderloh UG, Jauron SD, Fingerle V, Leitritz L, Hayes SF, Hautman JM, Nelson CM, Huberty BW, Kurtti TJ, Ahlstrand GG: Invasion and intracellular development of the human granulocytic ehrlichiosis agent in tick cell culture. J Clin Microbiol. 1999, 37 (8): 2518-2524.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu L, Narasimhan S, Dai J, Zhang L, Cheng G, Fikrig E: Ixodes scapularis salivary gland protein P11 facilitates migration of Anaplasma phagocytophilum from the tick gut to salivary glands. EMBO Rep. 2011, 12: 1196-1203. 10.1038/embor.2011.177.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sukumaran B, Narasimhan S, Anderson J, DePont K, Marcantonio N, Krishnan M, Fish D, Telford S, Kantor F, Fikrig E: An Ixodes scapularis protein required for survival of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in tick salivary glands. J Exp Med. 2006, 203: 1507-1517. 10.1084/jem.20060208.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sultana H, Neelakanta G, Kantor F, Malawista S, Fish D, Montgomery R, Fikrig E: Anaplasma phagocytophilum induces actin phosphorylation to selectively regulate gene transcription in Ixodes scapularis ticks. J Exp Med. 2010, 207: 1727-1743. 10.1084/jem.20100276.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Neelakanta G, Sultana H, Fish D, Anderson J, Fikrig E: Anaplasma phagocytophilum induces Ixodes scapularis ticks to express an antifreeze glycoprotein gene that enhances their survival in the cold. J Clin Invest. 2010, 120: 3179-3190. 10.1172/JCI42868.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pedra J, Narasimhan S, Rendić D, DePonte K, Bell-Sakyi L, Wilson I, Fikrig E: Fucosylation enhances colonization of ticks by Anaplasma phagocytophilum. Cell Microbiol. 2010, 12: 1222-1234. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2010.01464.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lew-Tabor AE, Kurscheid S, Barrero R, Gondro C, Moolhuijzen PM, Rodriguez-Valle M, Morgan JA, Covacin C, Bellgard MI: Gene expression evidence for off-target effects caused by RNA interference-mediated gene silencing of ubiquitin-63E in the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus. Int J Parasitol. 2011, 41 (9): 1001-1014. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2011.05.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.