Open Access

Proteins of Leishmania (Viannia) shawi confer protection associated with Th1 immune response and memory generation

  • Luiz Felipe D Passero1, 2, 5Email author,
  • Ana Kely Carvalho1,
  • Maria LAC Bordon1,
  • Alexis Bonfim-Melo2,
  • Karina Carvalho3,
  • Esper G Kallás3,
  • Bianca BA Santos3,
  • Marcos H Toyama2,
  • Adriana Paes-Leme4,
  • Carlos EP Corbett1 and
  • Márcia D Laurenti1
Parasites & Vectors20125:64

DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-5-64

Received: 1 November 2011

Accepted: 30 March 2012

Published: 30 March 2012

Abstract

Background

Leishmania (Viannia) shawi parasite was first characterized in 1989. Recently the protective effects of soluble leishmanial antigen (SLA) from L. (V.) shawi promastigotes were demonstrated using BALB/c mice, the susceptibility model for this parasite. In order to identify protective fractions, SLA was fractionated by reverse phase HPLC and five antigenic fractions were obtained.

Methods

F1 fraction was purified from L. (V.) shawi parasite extract by reverse phase HPLC. BALB/c mice were immunized once a week for two consecutive weeks by subcutaneous routes in the rump, using 25 μg of F1. After 1 and 16 weeks of last immunization, groups were challenged in the footpad with L. (V.) shawi promastigotes. After 2 months, those same mice were sacrificed and parasite burden, cellular and humoral immune responses were evaluated.

Results

The F1 fraction induced a high degree of protection associated with an increase in IFN-γ, a decrease in IL-4, increased cell proliferation and activation of CD8+T lymphocytes. Long-term protection was acquired in F1-immunized mice, associated with increased CD4+ central memory T lymphocytes and activation of both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. In addition, F1-immunized groups showed an increase in IgG2a levels.

Conclusions

The inductor capability of antigens to generate memory lymphocytes that can proliferate and secrete beneficial cytokines upon infection could be an important factor in the development of vaccine candidates against American Tegumentary Leishmaniasis.

Keywords

Leishmania (Viannia) shawi Proteic fraction Immunization Cellular immune response Long-term protection

Background

Leishmaniasis constitutes a group of diseases ranging from visceral to cutaneous forms of illness. In the New World, different species of Leishmania act as agents of human disease [1, 2], such as L. (L.) chagasi or L. (L.) infantum, which is the only species known to induce the visceral form of the disease. Tegumentary forms can be caused by distinct species, which are responsible for the spectrum of disease ranging from single cutaneous lesions to anergic diffuse leishmaniasis [35]. The control of tegumentary leishmaniasis in the New World is difficult due to the natural features of reservoir and vectors, making the elimination of both components hard to achieve [6]. For these reasons, the development of prophylactic measures is highly indicated for the control of leishmaniasis.

An interesting prophylactic measure to limit the epidemiology of leishmaniasis is the development of vaccines. The immunogens used to formulate vaccine candidates can be classified according to their method of formulation: live parasites, the classic model of leishmanization [7]; first generation vaccines that use crude parasite antigens [8, 9]; second generation vaccines that use fractionated, purified or recombinant antigens [10]; and third generation vaccines that use genetic material as the immunogen [11].

Second generation vaccine candidates present good perspectives for the development of vaccines, since some immunosuppressive antigens present in first generation vaccines can be eliminated through purification [12]. Moreover, second generation vaccines present no risk of intercalating with the host genetic material, as some DNA vaccines can do, despite their potential for curing a number of disorders [13]. Thus, an important class of second generation vaccine candidates have been purified and analyzed regarding their protective properties, such as fucose mannose ligand and antigens released by visceral and cutaneous strains of Leishmania sp., which induced strong protection in experimental and natural leishmaniasis [1416].

In the New World, at least seven species of Leishmania affect humans and the most important cutaneous species are L. (L.) amazonensis and L. (V.) braziliensis [1]. For this reason, the development of vaccine candidates is important to protect people living in endemic areas who are exposed to vectors and parasites [17]. A series of fractions and purified antigens have been characterized and used to achieve protection against L. (L.) amazonensis and L. (V.) braziliensis [1820]. Despite their medical and epidemiological importance in the New World, other parasite species that affect humans are rarely studied, such as L. (V.) shawi and L. (V.) panamensis [21, 22]. Some recent studies have demonstrated that antigens derived from both these species were immunogenic and beneficial to experimental hosts following challenge [23, 24]. Species of the Viannia subgenus can be a useful target for developing cross-protective vaccine candidates, since they are monophyletic, and thus have homologous antigens with other Leishmania (Viannia) sp. [25], facilitating the development of cross-protective vaccines. Moreover, in the New World, the majority of species affecting humans belong to the Viannia subgenus, thus justifying the search of vaccine candidates among L. (Viannia) sp. representatives.

In order to identify immunogenic fractions involved in the protection of BALB/c mice, the soluble leishmanial antigen (SLA) from L. (V.) shawi was fractionated and the effect of one proteic fraction (F1) was analyzed regarding its constitution and the degree of protection induced in BALB/c mice following an infectious challenge. The main immunological alterations that occurred in BALB/c mice were also evaluated.

Methods

Experimental animals

Eight-week-old male BALB⁄c mice obtained from the Animal Facility of the School of Medicine of São Paulo University, Brazil, were maintained in our laboratory during the experiments, in accordance with the institutional guidelines regarding the welfare of experimental animals and with the approval of the Animal Ethics Committee of São Paulo University (0280/07).

Parasite

L. (V.) shawi (MHOM/BR/96/M15789) parasite was isolated from a patient with American tegumentary leishmaniasis in Buriticupu County, State of Maranhão, Brazil, and identified by monoclonal antibodies and multilocus enzyme electrophoresis at the Evandro Chagas Institute in Belém, State of Pará, Brazil. The parasites maintained in BALB/c mice footpads were isolated and grown in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco Invitrogen, USA) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS, 0.25 mM HEPES, 10 μg/ml gentamicin and 100 IU/ml penicillin. On day 6 of culture, promastigote forms were centrifuged (1,200 g, 10 min) with phosphate buffer saline solution (PBS, pH 7.4) and used for antigen production and mouse infection.

Purification of antigens from L. (V.) shawi promastigotes

Promastigote forms (~109 promastigotes) in the stationary phase of growth were recovered by centrifugation at 1,200 g for 10 min at 4°C, followed by 3 washes with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) at 1,200 g for 10 min at 4°C. Lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl; 40 mM NaCl; 10 mM EDTA) was added to the promastigote pellet and the material was frozen in liquid nitrogen and thawed at room temperature three times to produce total parasite extract (AG). Further, AG was centrifuged at 10,000 g for 1 h at 4°C, the supernatant was collected (SLA), lyophilized and applied onto a reverse phase HPLC to purify the proteic fractions, according to the methodology described in Toyama et al. (2001) [26]. Briefly, lyophilized SLA (containing 10 mg of proteins) was dissolved in 250 μl of buffer A (0.1% trifluoroacetic acetic acid, TFA) and the supernatant was then applied on an analytical reverse phase HPLC column, previously equilibrated with buffer A for 15 min. The elution of fractions was conducted using a linear gradient of buffer B (66.6% Acetonitrile in buffer A) and the chromatographic run was monitored at 280 nm of absorbance for 55 min. The fractions were collected based on their sharpness and their hydrophilic profile in the elution buffer. The samples were lyophilized and further solubilized with PBS, sterilized in a 0.22 μm membrane (Eppendorff, USA) and the protein amounts were estimated through the Bradford method. Lysis buffer was also applied onto an analytical reverse phase HPLC column as control sample under the same conditions of SLA. F1 was submitted to electrophoresis to determine the presence of proteins [27].

Protein identification by mass spectrometry

Purified F1 was reduced, alkylated and submitted to in-gel digestion with trypsin [28]. An aliquot (4.5 μL) of the resulting peptide mixture was separated by C18 (100 μm × 100 mm) nanoUPLC (nanoAcquity, Waters) coupled with a Q-Tof Ultima mass spectrometer (Waters) with nano-electrospray source at a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min. The gradient was 2-90% acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid over 45 min. The instrument was operated in the 'top three' mode, in which one MS spectrum was acquired followed by MS/MS of the top three most-intense peaks detected. The spectra were acquired using software MassLynx v.4.1 and the raw data files were converted to a peak list format (mgf) by the software Mascot Distiller v.2.3.2.0, 2009 (Matrix Science Ldt.) and searched against non-redundant protein database NCBI nr 2010.09.24 restricted to Leishmania (51635 sequences; 31433329 residues) using search engine MASCOT v.2.3.01 (Matrix Science Ltd.), with carbamidomethylation as a fixed modification, oxidation of methionine as a variable modification, one trypsin missed cleavage and a tolerance of 0.1 Da for both precursor and fragment ions.

Immunization scheme and challenge

Male BALB/c mice, eight per group, were immunized with F1 fraction once a week for two consecutive weeks by subcutaneous route in the rump using 25 μg of protein [16, 24]. Control mice (n = 16) were injected with 50 μl of PBS by the same route. One week after the last immunization, immunized mice were infected subcutaneously in the hind footpad with 106 promastigote forms of L. (V.) shawi. Eight mice from the control group received only PBS in the hind footpad and the remainder were infected using the same procedure for immunized mice. To investigate the long-term protection [29] induced by F1, mice were immunized as described above, and were challenged in the footpad after 4 months (F1-4 m group). The infection was monitored weekly for eight weeks by measuring the lesion size using a dial micrometer and expressed as the difference in size between the infected and the contra lateral uninfected footpad. The mice were sacrificed in a CO2 chamber and skin and lymph node fragments were obtained to determine parasite burden by the limiting-dilution assay [30]. Fragments of skin from the F1, F1-4 m, Infected and Healthy groups were processed by usual histological techniques to analyze the inflammatory process.

Evaluation of cellular immune responses

Popliteal lymph nodes from F1, F1-4 m, Infected and Healthy groups were collected at 8 weeks postinfection and the cell suspensions (2 × 105/well) were cultured under stimulation with 10 μg of AG or F1 fraction. After 72 h, the supernatants were collected and the amounts of IL-4, IL-12, IFN-γ, (BD, USA) and TGF-β (e-Biosciences, USA) were quantified by sandwich ELISA, in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations, using recombinant cytokines as standard. Following supernatant collection, cell proliferation of each group was evaluated as described by Ahmed et al. (1994) [31]. Briefly, the plates with cells were washed 3 times with PBS and then 50 μl of 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) at 5 mg/ml in RPMI 1640 was added to each well. After 4 h, 50 μl of 10% SDS was added to the wells. The plate was read in an ELISA reader at 595 nm.

Analysis of memory T lymphocytes in immunized mice

Lymph node cells from F1, F1-4 m, Infected and Healthy groups were adjusted to 8 × 105 cell in a 96-well plates and monoclonal antibodies (BD, USA) anti-mouse CD3ε (FITC), anti-mouse CD4 L3T4 (PerCP), anti-mouse CD8α (Alexa Fluor 700), anti-mouse CD45RB (PE) and anti-mouse CD62L (APC) at a dilution of 1:100 were added to the cell culture and incubated for 30 min at 4°C. After this step, the cells were washed three times with MACS buffer (2 mM EDTA; 0.5% BSA em PBS) and the plate was centrifuged at 1700 rpm for 5 min at 4°C. The cells were fixed with 100 μl paraformaldehyde 1%, and the sample acquisitions were performed using a FACSCanto cytometer (BD, USA). To compensate samples, microbeads (BD, USA) stained with each monoclonal antibody was prepared and they were injected into the cytometer prior to the samples. The data were analyzed using FlowJo 7.6.1 (TreeStar, USA) for Windows. Both CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocyte were identified in samples, followed by identification of CD62Llow and CD62Lhigh positive subsets. These T lymphocyte populations were further characterized by CD45RB marker [32] (Additional file 1: Figure S1).

Analysis of the humoral immune response

The humoral immune response was evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). High-binding plates (Costar, USA) were coated with 1 μg/well of L. (V.) shawi SLA, overnight at 4°C. Next, the plates were blocked with 10% of nonfat milk in PBS (2 h at 37°C) to prevent nonspecific binding. Mouse sera (1:50) were added and the plates were incubated for 1 h at 35°C. After washing, HPR goat anti-mouse IgG1 and IgG2a (SouthernBiotech, USA) (1:2000) were used for 1 h at 35°C. After washing, TMB was added to each well for 15 min. The reaction was stopped with 50 μl of 2 N sulfuric acid and the plates were read at 450 nm in an ELISA reader. Sera from L. shawi chronically infected mice were also used as positive controls (data not shown). PBS with 0.05% Tween 20 was used in all washing steps.

Statistical analysis

The results were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments and the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare lesion size, parasite load and cytokine expression between the groups. Differences were considered statistically significant at a 5% significance level (p < 0.05). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 17.0 for Windows software (SPSS Inc. USA).

Results

Purification of F1 fraction and brief summary of mass spectrometry data

The whole antigen was submitted to reverse phase HPLC to purify the fraction F1 (Figure 1, black line). The lysis buffer (control sample) did not interfere in the purification of F1 fraction (Figure 1, grey line). F1 fraction yield around one percent of SLA.
Figure 1

Soluble leishmanial antigen (SLA) from L. (V.) shawi promastigotes was submitted to reverse phase chromatography and F1 proteic fraction were isolated based on their sharpness and hydrophilicity (black line). Lysis buffer also was applied as sample control (grey line).

Due to the important data obtained using the F1 fraction, we considered it essential to identify the proteins present in this fraction. Mass spectrometry demonstrated that F1 presented 65 different proteins, 41 with acidic, 24 basic and 4 with a neutral pH. Thirty-two proteins belonging to F1 of L. (V.) shawi present similarities with proteins of L. (V.) braziliensis, 14 with proteins of L. (L.) infantum, 11 with proteins of L. major, 7 with proteins of L. (L.) mexicana and 1 with a protein of L. donovani. Other proteins had no previous reports in the literature concerning their functional activities and were considered hypothetical proteins (Additional file 2: Table S1).

Lesion size, histology and analysis of parasite burden

The infected group presented a progressive increase in lesion size over time (Figure 2A), while the F1 and F1-4 m-immunized groups showed a decrease in skin lesions, which was significantly lower than infected mice between 5 and 8 weeks post-challenge (p < 0.05).
Figure 2

Lesion development, parasitism and histopathology of F1, F1-4 m and Infected groups. A--The course of lesions was accompanied during 8 weeks in all groups. B--Parasitism in skin and lymph nodes of F1, F1- 4 m and Infected groups. C, D, E--Histopathology of skin from F1, F1-4 m and Infected groups, respectively. Arrows show amastigote inner mononuclear cells. Coloration in HE at 400× magnification. Bars represent 5 μm. * and ** p < 0.05 indicate that lesion size of F1 and F1-4 m groups significantly differ from infected mice. and ††p < 0.05 indicate that parasite burden in the skin and lymph nodes of F1 and F1-4 m group significantly differ from infected mice.

The F1-immunized group presented a reduction of 87% in parasites in the skin and 92% in the lymph nodes, while in F1-4 m-immunized mice, a reduction of 89.5% in the skin and 95.7% in the lymph nodes was recorded (Figure 2B).

The skin of the F1 and F1-4 m groups presented focal mononuclear inflammatory infiltrate with no necrotic region and macrophages with few parasites (Figure 2C and 2D, arrows). In contrast, the infected group presented diffuse inflammatory infiltrate into the epidermis and dermis, with heavily parasitized mononuclear cells (Figure 2E).

Analysis of cellular immune response

Lymph node cells from the F1 and F1-4 m groups under stimulation with either AG or F1 fraction produced greater levels of IFN-γ compared with cells from infected mice (p < 0.05) stimulated with the same antigens (Figure 3A).
Figure 3

The levels of IFN-γ (A) and IL-4 (B) were quantified in supernatant of lymph node cells from F1, F1-4 m and Infected groups. * and **p < 0.05 indicate that cytokine production from cells stimulated with AG or F1 significantly differs from cytokine production from the infected group under the same stimulations.

In comparison with the infected group, AG-stimulated cells from the F1 and F1-4 m groups presented diminished production of IL-4 (p < 0.05); however, the stimulation of cells from the F1 and F1-4 m groups with F1 fraction led to the increase of this cytokine (p < 0.05), which was not detected in cells from infected mice under F1 fraction stimulation (Figure 3B).

Cells from healthy mice produced no significant amounts of cytokines. Similarly, cells from all groups with no specific stimulation produced no IL-4 and IFN-γ. IL-12 and TGF-β proteins were not detected with or without specific stimulations.

After stimulation with AG and F1 fraction, cell proliferations were assayed using MTT (Figure 4). The F1 and F1-4 m groups presented significantly greater proliferation under any stimuli compared with cells from both infected and healthy mice (p < 0.05).
Figure 4

Cell proliferation was assayed in F1, F1-4 m, Infected and Healthy groups. * and ** p < 0.05 indicate that cellular proliferation of cells stimulated with AG and F1 significantly differ from cells from the infected group under the same stimulations. and †† p < 0.05 indicates that cellular proliferation of cells stimulated with AG and F1 significantly differ from the Healthy group under the same stimulations.

Analysis of memory T lymphocytes in immunized mice

The F1-4 m group presented a significant increase (p < 0.05) in CD4+CD62LlowCD45RBlow T lymphocytes (CD4+T central memory lymphocytes) compared with infected and healthy groups (Figure 5A). Both the F1 and infected groups presented significant reductions in the frequencies of CD8+ T memory central cells (CD8+CD62LlowCD45RBlow).
Figure 5

Analysis of memory cells in F1, F1-4 m, Infected and Healthy groups. *p < 0.05 indicates statistically significant differences between the frequencies of CD4+CD62LlowCD45RBlow and CD4+CD62LlowCD45RBhigh T lymphocytes compared with the frequencies of the infected group. **p < 0.05 indicates statistically significant differences between the frequencies of CD8+CD62LlowCD45RBhigh T lymphocytes compared with the frequencies of the infected group. p < 0.05 indicates that the frequencies of CD4+CD62LlowCD45RBlow and CD4+CD62LlowCD45RBhigh T lymphocytes significantly differ compared with the frequencies of the healthy group. ††p < 0.05 indicates that the frequencies of CD8+CD62LlowCD45RBlow and CD8+CD62LlowCD45RBhigh T lymphocytes significantly differ compared with the frequencies of the infected group.

F1-4 m presented a significant increase in CD3+CD4+CD62LlowCD45RBhigh (activated CD4+ T lymphocytes) (Figure 5B) compared with infected and healthy mice (p < 0.05), and both F1 and F1-4 m presented significant increases in activated CD8+ T cells (CD3+CD8+CD62LlowCD45RBhigh) compared with infected and healthy mice.

The frequencies of naïve T CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes (CD3+CD4+CD62Lhigh or CD3+CD8+CD62Lhigh) were similar between the groups (data not show).

Analysis of humoral immune response

All the experimental groups presented increases in IgG1 anti-Leishmania antibodies compared with healthy mice (p < 0.05); however, the F1-immunized group presented a significant reduction in IgG1 anti-Leishmania compared with infected mice (Figure 6). The levels of IgG2a anti-Leishmania were increased in both the F1 and F1-4 m groups compared with infected and healthy mice (p < 0.05).
Figure 6

Humoral immune response in F1, F1-4 m, Infected and Healthy mice. * and **p < 0.05 indicate that IgG1 and IgG2a anti-Leishmania significantly differ from the infected group, and ††p < 0.05 indicate that IgG1 and IgG2a anti-Leishmania significantly differ from the healthy group.

Discussion

In the present study the antigenic fraction (F1) derived from L. (V.) shawi promastigotes was purified, characterized and its protective potential in a murine model of L. (V.) shawi infection was evaluated. The F1 fraction obtained seems to provide long-term protection for mice.

Characterization of the F1 fraction revealed its complexity. The fraction was composed of a variety of proteins that had no previously reported function, but these can be associated with physiological requirements of L. (V.) shawi. Certain proteins seem to participate in the physiology and the infective processes of this parasite, such as α-tubulin, elongation factor 1-α and glucose transporter (details in Additional file 2: Table S1) and a few of them had some immunostimulatory properties, such as dynein [33], chaperonin HSP60 [34] and kinesin [35]. Dey et al. [36] verified that a DNA vaccine composed of kinesin and esat-6 genes from L. donovani and Mycobacterium tuberculosis, respectively, presented high immunogenicity to BALB/c mice as determined by its potential to induce IL-2 and IFN-γ production, indicating that kinesin protein presented in F1 could participate in the immunity generation of F1 and F1-4 m-immunized mice; however, some proteins could be associated with the suppression of cellular immune response due to the diversity of F1. In addition, the F1 fraction showed a high number of proteins similar to those of L. (V.) braziliensis. Antigens with previously reported immunostimulatory properties showed a high degree of genetic similarities with those of L. (V.) braziliensis (98-100%). On the other hand, antigens from L. (V.) shawi presented some degree of genetic heterogenicity (68-89%) compared with antigens of Leishmania subgenus representatives (data not shown). These findings suggest that certain antigens of the F1 fraction could be interesting targets for the development of a cross-protective vaccine against infections caused by the Viannia subgenus due to the high degree of similarity. However, this proposal needs to be confirmed in future experiments.

In experimental L. (V.) shawi infection, progressive disease is associated with greater lesion size, strong inflammatory processes with necrotic areas and heavily parasitized mononuclear cells [22, 30]. In the F1 fraction, certain proteins may be protective, since F1-immunized mice were able to control the infection, as determined by the smaller lesion size, mild inflammatory processes and, importantly, they drastically reduced the number of parasites in the skin and lymph nodes of mice. These characteristics were reproduced in mice that were challenged 4 months after the last immunization, suggesting that as well as immunogenicity and protection, the F1 fraction induced long-term protection.

In fact, lymph node cells from the groups immunized with the F1 fraction increased the levels of IFN-γ and reduced production of IL-4 following AG stimulation. To eliminate parasites, it is essential to increase IFN-γ levels, since this cytokine is capable of activating macrophages to a leishmanicidal state through the production of microbicidal compounds, such as nitric oxide, and upregulate the expression of MHC [37], permitting elimination of the infectious agent and amplification of the expression of antigens to lymphocytes. Concomitantly, a low level of IL-4 is highly important to achieve resistance, since it can be viewed as a suppressor and mediator of Th1 and Th2 immune responses, respectively [38]. In addition, some studies of vaccination using second-generation vaccine candidates demonstrated that protection was associated with an increase in IFN-γ and a decrease in IL-4 cytokines in mice [39], indicating that immunogens capable of stimulating this immunological profile could be important vaccine candidates.

The stimulation of lymph node cells from F1- and F1-4 m-immunized mice with F1 fraction led to an increase in IFN-γ and IL-4 levels. Although IL-4 has been accepted as inductor of susceptibility in leishmaniasis, some studies have shown its importance in the generation, proliferation and maintenance of memory cells in experimental infections by L. donovani and Plasmodium yoelii [40, 41]. In fact, cells from F1 and F1-4 m showed increased proliferation compared with cells from infected mice, indicating that IL-4 could be partly responsible for this activity. In addition, in nonimmunized mice, cell proliferation did not occur, suggesting immune suppression caused by high parasitism, like that observed for L. donovani and L. major species [42, 43]. Besides the role of IFN-γ in the activation of infected cells, it also could play an important role in T lymphocyte proliferation [44].

After their encounter with antigens, lymphocytes are activated and proliferate, and after their clearance by regulatory mechanisms, the quantity of lymphocytes decreases, resulting in a small fraction of surviving memory cells that readily proliferate following a new encounter with the antigen [45]. In order to evaluate the frequencies of memory T cells in immunized mice, T lymphocytes were phenotyped with the markers CD62L and CD45RB. CD62L is an adhesion molecule associated with the activation and circulation of activated lymphocytes [46, 47]. CD45RB is an important molecule associated with TCR activation [48] and its expression is reduced following T lymphocyte activation. For these reasons, it is possible to assume that T lymphocytes presenting the phenotype CD62LlowCD45RBlow are central memory cells and CD62LlowCD45RBhigh are activated T cells [32, 49]. In this study, the F1 group presented a low frequency of central memory CD8+ T cells and a high frequency of activated CD8+ T lymphocytes, a reduction that could be associated with the differentiation of CD8+CD62LlowCD45RBlow toward an activated phenotype. Similar results were viewed in the F1-4 m group; however, without the decrease in the frequency of central memory CD8+ T cells. This activated phenotype of CD8+T lymphocytes should allow traffic between homing lymphoid organs to the site of infection, where this cell population can eliminate infected cells, since the main characteristic of CD8+T lymphocyte is to eliminate the target cell by cytotoxicity [50, 51]. Moreover, vaccination studies have stated that CD8+T cells activated by immunogens are primordial in the resistance against intracellular infections, establishing long-term immunity [29, 52]. Thus, immunization with the F1 fraction should activate CD8+T cells, leading to resistance against L. (V.) shawi infection.

The F1-4 m group also showed an increase in both central and activated CD4+ T lymphocytes, which was not observed in the F1 group. This fact can be associated with a high frequency of CD8+ T lymphocytes in F1-4 m, since activation of high numbers of CD8+T cells can also activate CD4+T lymphocytes, increasing the production of IFN-γ [53], which was observed in stimulated cells of F1-4 m mice.

The increase in IL-4 and IFN-γ can have direct consequences in elevating IgG1 and IgG2a, respectively [54]. These isotypes seem to have a direct correlation between susceptibility and resistance in experimental leishmaniasis, since IgG1 is linked to humoral immune response, while IgG2a is associated with the cellular immune response [55] and parasite destruction, which taken together, support the present results in which F1-immunized mice tend towards resistance induced by immunization with the F1 fraction, while the infected group tends towards susceptibility.

Conclusions

Analysis of our results indicates that the F1 fraction induces a beneficial response in BALB/c mice. The antigenic fraction favored increased production of IFN-γ, which has been associated with resistance against infection. Moreover, the long-term protection observed in immunized mice could be associated with both central memory and activated CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes. The results presented herein suggest that resistance against L. (V.) shawi infection can occur through activation of both CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes. Antigens capable of inducing this immunological profile could be important targets in the development of vaccine candidates against American Tegumentary Leishmaniasis.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) and HCFMUSP-LIM50. It is part of the doctoral thesis of L.F.D. Passero, under a FAPESP fellowship. The authors of the present work would like to thank Prof. Dr. Fernando T. Silveira for kindly identifying and donating the L. (V.) shawi parasite (strain MHOM/BR/96/M15789) and, more importantly, encouraging studies involving the present parasite strain.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Depto. de Patologia da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Laboratório de Patologia de Moléstias Infecciosas (LIM-50)
(2)
Campus Experimental do Litoral Paulista, Universidade Estadual Paulista
(3)
Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, (LIM-60), University of São Paulo
(4)
Brazilian Biosciences National Laboratory, CNPEM
(5)
Depto. de Patologia da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Laboratório de Patologia de Moléstias Infecciosas (LIM-50)

References

  1. Silveira FT, Lainson R, De Castro Gomes CM, Laurenti MD, Corbett CE: Immunopathogenic competences of Leishmania (V.) braziliensis and L. (L.) amazonensis in American cutaneous leishmaniasis. Parasite Immunol. 2009, 31: 423-431. 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2009.01116.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Crescente JA, Silveira FT, Lainson R, Gomes CM, Laurenti MD, Corbett CE: A cross-sectional study on the clinical and immunological spectrum of human Leishmania (L.) infantum chagasi infection in the Brazilian Amazon region. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2009, 103: 1250-1256. 10.1016/j.trstmh.2009.06.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Carvalho Mde L, de Andrade AS, Fontes CJ, Hueb M, de Oliveira Silva S, Melo MN: Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis is the prevalent species infecting patients with tegumentary leishmaniasis from Mato Grosso State, Brazil. Acta Trop. 2006, 98: 277-285. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2006.06.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Morrison B, Mendoza I, Delgado D, Reyes Jaimes O, Aranzazu N, Paniz Mondolfi AE: Diffuse (anergic) cutaneous leishmaniasis responding to amphotericin B. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2010, 35: e116-9. 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2009.03737.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Shaw JJ, Ishikawa EA, Lainson R, Braga RR, Silveira FT: Cutaneous leishmaniasis of man due to Leishmania (Viannia) shawi Lainson, de Souza, Póvoa, Ishikawa & Silveira, in Pará State, Brazil. Ann Parasitol Hum Comp. 1991, 66: 243-246.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lainson R, Shaw JJ: Epidemiology and ecology of leishmaniasis in Latin-America. Nature. 1978, 273: 595-600. 10.1038/273595a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Khamesipour A, Dowlati Y, Asilian A, Hashemi-Fesharki R, Javadi A, Noazin S, Modabber F: Leishmanization: use of an old method for evaluation of candidate vaccines against leishmaniasis. Vaccine. 2005, 23: 3642-3648. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.02.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Pessoa SB, Pestana BR: Ensaio sobre a vacinação preventiva na leishmaniose tegumentar americana, com germes mortos. Rev Biol Hyg. 1940, 10: 112-118.Google Scholar
  9. Antunes CM, Mayrink W, Magalhães PA, Costa A, Melo MN, Dias M, Michalick MSM, Williams P, Lima AO, Vieira JBF, Schettini APM: Controlled field trials of a vaccine against New World cutaneous leishmaniasis. Int J Epidemiol. 1986, 15: 572-580. 10.1093/ije/15.4.572.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Palatnik-de-Sousa CB, Paraguai-de-Souza E, Gomes EM, Borojevic R: Experimental murine Leishmania donovani infection: immunoprotection by the fucose-mannose ligand (FML). Braz J Med Biol Res. 1994, 27: 547-551.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Masih S, Arora SK, Vasishta RK: Efficacy of Leishmania donovani ribosomal P1 gene as DNA vaccine in experimental visceral leishmaniasis. Exp Parasitol. 2011, 129: 55-64. 10.1016/j.exppara.2011.05.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Rodrigues MM, Mendonça-Previato L, Charlab R, Barcinski MA: The cellular immune response to a purified antigen from Leishmania mexicana subsp. amazonensis enhances the size of the leishmanial lesion on susceptible mice. Infect Immun. 1987, 55: 3142-3148.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Baum C, von Kalle C: Gene therapy targeting hematopoietic cells: better not leave it to chance. Acta Haematol. 2003, 110: 107-119. 10.1159/000072459.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Palatnik-de-Sousa CB, Silva-Antunes I, Morgado Ade A, Menz I, Palatnik M, Lavor C: Decrease of the incidence of human and canine visceral leishmaniasis after dog vaccination with Leishmune in Brazilian endemic areas. Vaccine. 2009, 27: 3505-3512. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.03.045.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lemesre JL, Holzmuller P, Cavaleyra M, Gonçalves RB, Hottin G, Papierok G: Protection against experimental visceral leishmaniasis infection in dogs immunized with purified excreted secreted antigens of Leishmania infantum promastigotes. Vaccine. 2005, 23: 2825-2840. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.11.061.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Passero LF, Marques C, Vale-Gato I, Corbett CE, Laurenti MD, Santos-Gomes G: Analysis of the protective potential of antigens released by Leishmania (Viannia) shawi promastigotes. Arch Dermatol Res. 2012, 304: 47-55. 10.1007/s00403-011-1171-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Palatnik-de-Sousa CB, Day MJ: One Health: the global challenge of epidemic and endemic leishmaniasis. Parasit Vectors. 2011, 4: 197-10.1186/1756-3305-4-197.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mora AM, Mayrink W, Costa RT, Costa CA, Genaro O, Nascimento E: Protection of C57BL/10 mice by vaccination with association of purified proteins from Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 1999, 41: 243-248.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Pinheiro RO, Pinto EF, de Matos Guedes HL, Filho OA, de Mattos KA, Saraiva EM, de Mendonça SC, Rossi-Bergmann B: Protection against cutaneous leishmaniasis by intranasal vaccination with lipophosphoglycan. Vaccine. 2006, 24: 5645-5652. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.03.023.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Gorczynski RM: Immunization of susceptible BALB/c mice against Leishmania braziliensis. I. Resistance induced using as immunogen adherent or nonadherent cells from infected mice. Cell Immunol. 1985, 94: 1-10. 10.1016/0008-8749(85)90080-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Travi BL, Osorio Y, Saravia NG: The inflammatory response promotes cutaneous metastasis in hamsters infected with Leishmania (Viannia) panamensis. J Parasitol. 1996, 82: 454-457.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Passero LF, Sacomori JV, Tomokane TY, Corbett CE, da Silveira FT, Laurenti MD: Ex vivo and in vivo biological behavior of Leishmania (Viannia) shawi. Parasitol Res. 2009, 105: 1741-1747. 10.1007/s00436-009-1614-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Jayakumar A, Castilho TM, Park E, Goldsmith-Pestana K, Blackwell JM, McMahon-Pratt D: TLR1/2 activation during heterologous prime-boost vaccination (DNA-MVA) enhances CD8+ T Cell responses providing protection against Leishmania (Viannia). PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011, 5: e1204-10.1371/journal.pntd.0001204.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Passero LF, Da Costa Bordon ML, De Carvalho AK, Martins LM, Corbett CE, Laurenti MD: Exacerbation of Leishmania (Viannia) shawi infection in BALB/c mice after immunization with soluble antigen from amastigote forms. APMIS. 2010, 118: 973-981. 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2010.02679.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Cupolillo E, Grimaldi G, Momen H: A general classification of New World Leishmania using numerical zymotaxonomy. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1994, 50: 296-311.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Toyama MH, Toyama DO, Passero LF, Laurenti MD, Corbett CE, Tomokane TY, Fonseca FV, Antunes E, Joazeiro PP, Beriam LO, Martins MA, Monteiro HS, Fonteles MC: Isolation of a new L-amino acid oxidase from Crotalus durissus cascavella venom. Toxicon. 2006, 47: 47-57. 10.1016/j.toxicon.2005.09.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Laemmli UK: Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970, 227: 680-685. 10.1038/227680a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Hanna SL, Sherman NE, Kinter MT, Goldberg JB: Comparison of proteins expressed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains representing initial and chronic isolates from a cystic fibrosis patient: an analysis by 2-D gel electrophoresis and capillary column liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Microbiology. 2000, 146: 2495-2508.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Rhee EG, Mendez S, Shah JA, Wu CY, Kirman JR, Turon TN, Davey DF, Davis H, Klinman DM, Coler RN, Sacks DL, Seder RA: Vaccination with heat-killed leishmania antigen or recombinant leishmanial protein and CpG oligodeoxynucleotides induces long-term memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses and protection against Leishmania major infection. J Exp Med. 2002, 195: 1565-1573. 10.1084/jem.20020147.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Passero LF, Marques C, Vale-Gato I, Corbett CE, Laurenti MD, Santos-Gomes G: Histopathology, humoral and cellular immune response in the murine model of Leishmania (Viannia) shawi. Parasitol Int. 2010, 59: 159-165. 10.1016/j.parint.2009.12.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Ahmed SA, Gogal RM, Walsh JE: A new rapid and simple non-radioactive assay to monitor and determine the proliferation of lymphocytes: an alternative to [3H]thymidine incorporation assay. J Immunol Methods. 1994, 170: 211-224. 10.1016/0022-1759(94)90396-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Gomes-Pereira S, Rodrigues OR, Santos-Gomes GM: Dynamics of CD62L/CD45RB CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocyte subsets in hepatic and splenic tissues during murine visceral leishmaniasis. Immunol Lett. 2004, 95: 63-70. 10.1016/j.imlet.2004.06.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Stober CB, Lange UG, Roberts MT, Gilmartin B, Francis R, Almeida R, Peacock CS, McCann S, Blackwell JM: From genome to vaccines for leishmaniasis: screening 100 novel vaccine candidates against murine Leishmania major infection. Vaccine. 2006, 24: 2602-2616. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.12.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Rey-Ladino JA, Joshi PB, Singh B, Gupta R, Reiner NE: Leishmania major: molecular cloning, sequencing, and expression of the heat shock protein 60 gene reveals unique carboxy terminal peptide sequences. Exp Parasitol. 1997, 85: 249-263. 10.1006/expr.1996.4137.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Dey A, Sharma P, Redhu NS, Singh S: Kinesin motor domain of Leishmania donovani as a future vaccine candidate. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2008, 15: 836-842. 10.1128/CVI.00433-07.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Dey A, Kumar U, Sharma P, Singh S: Immunogenicity of candidate chimeric DNA vaccine against tuberculosis and leishmaniasis. Vaccine. 2009, 27: 5152-5160. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.05.100.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Strehl B, Seifert U, Krüger E, Heink S, Kuckelkorn U, Kloetzel PM: Interferon-gamma, the functional plasticity of the ubiquitin-proteasome system, and MHC class I antigen processing. Immunol Rev. 2005, 207: 19-30. 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2005.00308.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Nelms K, Keegan AD, Zamorano J, Ryan JJ, Paul WE: The IL-4 receptor: signaling mechanisms and biologic functions. Annu Rev Immunol. 1999, 17: 701-738. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.17.1.701.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Beyrodt CG, Pinto AR, Freymüller E, Barbiéri CL: Characterization of an antigen from Leishmania amazonensis amastigotes able to elicit protective responses in a murine model. Infect Immun. 1997, 65: 2052-2059.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Stäger S, Alexander J, Kirby AC, Botto M, Rooijen NV, Smith DF, Brombacher F, Kaye PM: Natural antibodies and complement are endogenous adjuvants for vaccine-induced CD8 T-cell responses. Nat Med. 2003, 9: 1287-1292. 10.1038/nm933.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Carvalho LH, Sano G, Hafalla JC, Morrot A, Curotto de Lafaille MA, Zavala F: IL-4-secreting CD4 T cells are crucial to the development of CD8 T-cell responses against malaria liver stages. Nat Med. 2002, 8: 166-170. 10.1038/nm0202-166.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Holaday BJ, Pompeu MM, Jeronimo S, Texeira MJ, Sousa Ade A, Vasconcelos AW, Pearson RD, Abrams JS, Locksley RM: Potential role for interleukin-10 in the immunosuppression associated with kalaazar. J Clin Invest. 1993, 92: 2626-2632. 10.1172/JCI116878.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Tabatabaee PA, Abolhassani M, Mahdavi M, Nahrevanian H, Azadmanesh K: Leishmania major: Secreted antigens of Leishmania major promastigotes shift the immune response of the C57BL/6 mice toward Th2 in vitro. Exp Parasitol. 2011, 127: 46-51. 10.1016/j.exppara.2010.06.033.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Whitmire JK, Tan JT, Whitton JL: Interferon-gamma acts directly on CD8+ T cells to increase their abundance during virus infection. J Exp Med. 2005, 201: 1053-1059. 10.1084/jem.20041463.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Sprent J, Surh CD: Normal T cell homeostasis: the conversion of naive cells into memory-phenotype cells. Nat Immunol. 2011, 12: 478-484.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Powrie F, Correa-Oliveira R, Mauze S, Coffman RL: Regulatory interactions between CD45RBhigh and CD45RBlow CD4+ T cells are important for the balance between protective and pathogenic cell-mediated immunity. J Exp Med. 1994, 179: 589-600. 10.1084/jem.179.2.589.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Costa RP, Gollob KJ, Machado PR, Bacellar OA, Almeida RP, Barral A, Barral-Netto M, Carvalho EM, Dutra WO: Adhesion molecule expression patterns indicate activation and recruitment of CD4+ T cells from the lymph node to the peripheral blood of early cutaneous leishmaniasis patients. Immunol Lett. 2003, 90: 155-159. 10.1016/j.imlet.2003.09.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Croft M, Carter L, Swain SL, Dutton RW: Generation of polarized antigen-specific CD8 effector populations: reciprocal action of interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-12 in promoting type 2 versus type 1 cytokine profiles. J Exp Med. 1994, 180: 1715-1728. 10.1084/jem.180.5.1715.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Freitas do Rosário AP, Muxel SM, Rodríguez-Málaga SM, Sardinha LR, Zago CA, Castillo-Méndez SI, Alvarez JM, D'Império Lima MR: Gradual decline in malaria-specific memory T cell responses leads to failure to maintain long-term protective immunity to Plasmodium chabaudi AS despite persistence of B cell memory and circulating antibody. J Immunol. 2008, 181: 8344-8355.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Stefani MM, Müller I, Louis JA: Leishmania major-specific CD8+ T cells are inducers and targets of nitric oxide produced by parasitized macrophages. Eur J Immunol. 1994, 24: 746-752. 10.1002/eji.1830240338.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Ruiz JH, Becker I: CD8 cytotoxic T cells in cutaneous leishmaniasis. Parasite Immunol. 2007, 29: 671-678. 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2007.00991.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Colmenares M, Kima PE, Samoff E, Soong L, McMahon-Pratt D: Perforin and gamma interferon are critical CD8+ T-cell-mediated responses in vaccine-induced immunity against Leishmania amazonensis infection. Infect Immun. 2003, 71: 3172-3182. 10.1128/IAI.71.6.3172-3182.2003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Herath S, Kropf P, Müller I: Cross-talk between CD8(+) and CD4(+) T cells in experimental cutaneous leishmaniasis: CD8(+) T cells are required for optimal IFN-gamma production by CD4(+) T cells. Parasite Immunol. 2003, 25: 559-567. 10.1111/j.0141-9838.2004.00668.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Akdis M, Burgler S, Crameri R, Eiwegger T, Fujita H, Gomez E, Klunker S, Meyer N, O'Mahony L, Palomares O, Rhyner C, Quaked N, Schaffartzik A, Van De Veen W, Zeller S, Zimmermann M, Akdis CA, Akdis CA: Interleukins, from 1 to 37, and interferon-γ: Receptors, functions, and roles in diseases. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011, 127: 701-721. 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.11.050. Akdis et al 2011View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Coffman RL, Lebman DA, Rothman P: Mechanism and regulation of immunoglobulin isotype switching. Adv Immunol. 1993, 54: 229-270.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Passero et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement