Open Access

The impact of Wolbachia infection on the rate of vertical transmission of dengue virus in Brazilian Aedes aegypti

  • Etiene Casagrande Pacidônio1, 3,
  • Eric Pearce Caragata1,
  • Debora Magalhães Alves1,
  • João Trindade Marques2 and
  • Luciano Andrade Moreira1Email author
Contributed equally
Parasites & Vectors201710:296

DOI: 10.1186/s13071-017-2236-z

Received: 20 February 2017

Accepted: 8 June 2017

Published: 17 June 2017

Abstract

Background

Wolbachia pipientis is a common endosymbiotic bacterium of arthropods that strongly inhibits dengue virus (DENV) infection and transmission in the primary vector, the mosquito Aedes aegypti. For that reason, Wolbachia-infected Ae. aegypti are currently being released into the field as part of a novel strategy to reduce DENV transmission. However, there is evidence that DENV can be transmitted vertically from mother to progeny, and this may help the virus persist in nature in the absence of regular human transmission. The effect of Wolbachia infection on this process had not previously been examined.

Results

We challenged Ae. aegypti with different Brazilian DENV isolates either by oral feeding or intrathoracic injection to ensure disseminated infection. We examined the effect of Wolbachia infection on the prevalence of DENV infection, and viral load in the ovaries. For orally infected mosquitoes, Wolbachia decreased the prevalence of infection by 71.29%, but there was no such effect when the virus was injected. Interestingly, regardless of the method of infection, Wolbachia infection strongly reduced DENV load in the ovaries. We then looked at the effect of Wolbachia on vertical transmission, where we observed only very low rates of vertical transmission. There was a trend towards lower rates in the presence of Wolbachia, with overall maximum likelihood estimate of infection rates of 5.04 per 1000 larvae for mosquitoes without Wolbachia, and 1.93 per 1000 larvae for Wolbachia-infected mosquitoes, after DENV injection. However, this effect was not statistically significant.

Conclusions

Our data support the idea that vertical transmission of DENV is rare in nature, even in the absence of Wolbachia. Indeed, we observed that vertical transmission rates were low even when the midgut barrier was bypassed, which might help to explain why we only observed a trend towards lower vertical transmission rates in the presence of Wolbachia. Nevertheless, the low prevalence of disseminated DENV infection and lower DENV load in the ovaries supports the hypothesis that the presence of Wolbachia in Ae. aegypti would have an effect on the vertical transmission of DENV in the field.

Keywords

Wolbachia Dengue virus Aedes aegypti Vertical transmission Arbovirus

Background

Novel mosquito control methods are required to reduce the heavy disease burden associated with dengue virus (DENV), with an estimated 390 million cases occurring annually [1]. One promising strategy involves using the bacterium Wolbachia pipientis, one of the most prevalent natural bacterial endosymbionts of insects [2]. Although the primary DENV vector, Aedes aegypti, is not naturally infected by Wolbachia, a stable infection with the wMel Wolbachia strain have been generated via transinfection [3]. These Wolbachia-infected Ae. aegypti are highly resistant to DENV infection, exhibiting decreased prevalence of infection and DENV load, as well as decreased rates of disseminated infection [3, 4]. Critically, wMel infection also greatly decreases viral prevalence in the salivary glands and more importantly the saliva, and therefore likely reduces vector competence for DENV [35].

This anti-DENV effect forms the basis of the Wolbachia transmission blocking approach, which is currently being used around the world to reduce the DENV burden (www.eliminatedengue.com). In this strategy, wMel-infected mosquitoes are released into the field, where the bacterium can spread to high levels in wild populations due to cytoplasmic incompatibility, a type of reproductive incompatibility that favours the propagation of Wolbachia-infected mosquitoes and acts as a form of drive [6]. The widespread deployment of wMel-infected mosquitoes in disease-endemic areas could potentially lead to a reduction in the transmission of DENV, or other viruses such as Zika and chikungunya [710].

Vertical transmission (VT) of DENV and other arboviruses from mother to progeny transovarially during egg development has been proposed as a potential explanation for the persistence of these viruses in nature during inter-epidemic periods [1113]. Data suggest that this occurs only rarely, and the epidemiological importance is still unclear [12]. Given the impact of Wolbachia on viral dissemination, which likely affects viral access to the ovaries, we theorised that the anti-viral effects of the bacterium could also extend to VT. To that end, we sought to characterise the impact of wMel infection on DENV VT, and DENV infection in the ovaries of Brazilian Ae. aegypti.

Methods

Mosquito lines and DENV isolates

Two Ae. aegypti mosquito lines were used in these experiments. The first, infected with the wMel Wolbachia strain (+Wolb), was derived from the original wMel-transinfected line [3] and backcrossed to a Brazilian genetic background, as previously described [14]. The second (-Wolb) was a Wolbachia-uninfected line, derived from +Wolb by tetracycline treatment, which occurred 2–3 years prior to the experiments described herein [14]. Microbial recolonization and outcrossing regimes for these lines have been previously described [14, 15].

Three DENV isolates were used in these experiments: DENV-1 BR-90 (6 × 105 pfu/ml; isolated in Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 1990, GenBank AF226685) [16], DENV-3 MG20 (1.9 × 106 pfu/ml; MG20, isolated in Contagem, MG, Brazil, 2013, viral genome unsequenced), and DENV-4 Boa Vista 1981 (6 × 106 pfu/ml; isolated in Boa Vista, RR, Brazil, 1981) [17]. Viruses were serially passaged in Aedes albopictus C6/36 cells, and infected supernatant harvested, titered via plaque forming assay, and then frozen, as previously described [15]. Virus aliquots were only thawed immediately prior to infection. All raw data from experiments are presented in Additional file 1.

Oral infection

Four to seven day-old +Wolb and -Wolb females were starved overnight, and then orally infected by feeding DENV-4 mixed 1:1 with freshly drawn human blood. Blood-fed mosquitoes were maintained on 10% sucrose for 16 days to exceed the extrinsic incubation period (EIP) for DENV, allowing the virus to invade tissues such as the ovaries, thus increasing the chance for the viral invasion of developing eggs, and vertical transmission. A period longer than 14 dpi was selected as wMel has been demonstrated to increase the duration of the EIP [18].

At this point, mosquitoes were offered a second, virus-free blood meal in order to induce egg development. Mosquitoes were allowed 3 days to lay eggs on damp filter paper in individual plastic Petri dishes and were then collected for quantification of DENV. The eggs laid by these mosquitoes were dried for 3 days and then hatched, and larvae reared to L3 and L4, whereupon they were washed twice with sterile water, dried on sterile filter paper, and then collected in pools containing an average of 7.79 larvae, with all larvae in each pool derived from a single female mosquito.

Total RNA from these samples was extracted using the TRIzol protocol (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). DENV prevalence (proportion of mosquitoes infected) and viral load (number of DENV copies per 1 μg of total RNA) of infection were quantified for adults and larvae using TaqMan-based RT-qPCR using a Viia 7 Real-Time PCR System (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and the following primers and probe: DENV_F: (5′-AAG GAC TAG AGG TTA GAG GAG ACC C-3′), DENV_R: (5′-CGT TCT GTG CCT GGA ATG ATG-3′), Probe: (5′-HEX- AAC AGC ATA TTG ACG CTG GGA GAG ACC AGA -BHQ1–3′). RNA samples were quantified in duplicate using the TaqMan Fast Virus 1-Step Master Mix (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), using a run profile of 50 °C for 6 min for reverse transcription, followed by 95 °C for 20 min to denature the enzyme, and then 45 cycles of 95 °C for 3 s, 60 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 1 s. For quantification purposes, the sequence of the DENV amplicon was cloned, amplified and then serially diluted to generate a standard curve, as previously described [19]. DENV positive +Wolb pools were screened for the presence of Wolbachia using the wd0513 gene [8], as described above.

In a separate experiment following the protocol described above, the ovaries of DENV-challenged mosquitoes were dissected in sterile 1× PBS 3 days after the second blood meal, total RNA was extracted, and RT-PCR performed as above.

Intrathoracic injection

Four to seven day-old -Wolb and +Wolb female mosquitoes were injected intrathoracically with 69 nl of DENV-1, DENV-3, or DENV-4 using a Nanoject II injector (Drummond Scientific, Broomall, PA, USA). Virus stocks were not diluted from the concentrations described above. Seven days later, mosquitoes were fed a virus-free blood meal in order to stimulate egg production, and then larval collection was performed as above, with pools containing an average of 4.19 larvae. The decreased pool size was reflective of lower adult fecundity rates post-injection. Five experiments were performed: 3 using DENV-4, and 1 each for DENV-1 and DENV-3. Ovaries were dissected from mosquitoes in one of the DENV-4 experiments, and the DENV-1 experiment, and processed as above.

Data analysis

In each experiment, the maximum likelihood estimate (MLE) of infection rate per 1000 larvae was calculated independently for -Wolb and +Wolb mosquitoes using the formula:
$$ \mathrm{MLE}=1-{\left(1- Y/ X\right)}^{1/ m} $$

where Y is the number of positive pools, X is the total number of pools, and m is the average pool size in the experiment [20].

Minimum infection rates (MIR) were not calculated due to non-uniformity in pool sizes. MLEs were also compiled across all injection data, and compared between -Wolb and +Wolb mosquitoes using Fisher’s exact test.

DENV prevalence data (proportion of mosquitoes infected) were compared between -Wolb and +Wolb mosquitoes using Fisher’s exact test, while DENV load data (DENV titre) were not normally distributed, and were compared using Mann-Whitney U-tests. All statistical analyses were performed using Prism 6.0 g (Graphpad).

Results and discussion

Ovary infection

DENV infection in the ovaries is a likely stepping-stone to VT [12]. In ovaries dissected from -Wolb and +Wolb mosquitoes that were orally challenged with DENV-4, we observed 71.29% decrease in prevalence of infection associated with wMel (Fig. 1, Fisher’s exact test: P = 0.0002, OR = 0.0875, CI = 0.0237–0.327), which could indicate that the anti-DENV effect of Wolbachia can operate on the tissue level, or that the general inhibitory effect of Wolbachia limits the amount of virus that reaches the ovaries [21]. Critically, this effect disappeared after challenge with DENV-1 or DENV-4 via injection (Fisher’s exact test: DENV-1: P = 1, OR = 0.3171, CI = 0.0122–8.267; DENV-4: P = 0.4878, OR = 5.513, CI = 0.2488–122.2), highlighting the importance of the midgut to the anti-DENV effects of wMel.
Fig. 1

The effect of wMel on DENV infection in Aedes aegypti ovaries. DENV prevalence and viral load in the ovaries of mosquitoes with (+Wolb, blue circles) and without (-Wolb, black circles) wMel Wolbachia infection. Mosquitoes were challenged with DENV-4 orally or via intrathoracic injection, or with DENV-1 via injection. Mosquitoes were fed on a virus-free blood meal either 16 days after DENV oral infection or 7 days post-DENV injection, with these times corresponding to the blood meal used to induce egg production in our vertical transmission experiments. At 72 h post-feeding, ovaries were dissected in sterile 1× PBS, total RNA was extracted, and genomic DENV levels quantified via RT-qPCR. Prevalence data were compared by Fisher’s exact test (***P < 0.001, ns: P > 0.05). Viral load data were compared pairwise by Mann-Whitney U-test (****P < 0.0001, *P < 0.05). Horizontal red lines represent treatment medians

However, regardless of the method of viral challenge, we observed that significantly decreased DENV load in the ovaries was associated with the presence of wMel (Mann-Whitney U-tests: DENV-4 oral infection: U = 4, n 1 = 16, n 2 = 7, P < 0.0001; DENV-1 injection: U = 116, n 1 = 20, n 2 = 19, P = 0.0379; DENV-4 injection: U = 112, n 1 = 19, n 2 = 21, P = 0.0173). This equated to a reduction in median DENV load of 98.75% in the oral feeding experiment, and a 97.04% and 73.69% decrease in the levels of DENV-1 and DENV-4 injection experiments, respectively. This decrease in viral load was not particularly surprising given the correlation between bacterial density and the presence of the antiviral effect [22, 23], and the fact that the ovaries typically have the highest Wolbachia density of any tissue, in order to facilitate high rates of maternal transmission [3, 24].

Vertical transmission

We observed low parental infection rates in the DENV-4 oral infection experiment, with a significant reduction associated with wMel infection (-Wolb: 11/60, +Wolb: 2/81; Fisher’s exact test, P = 0.002, OR = 0.1128, CI = 0.0240–0.5306). A total of 713 -Wolb larvae and 556 +Wolb larvae were screened in 85 and 78 pools, respectively, with only a single positive pool identified in the -Wolb treatment. This equated to MLE infection rates of 1.41 and 0 for -Wolb and +Wolb mosquitoes, respectively (Table 1). These VT rates were similar to those seen in other studies of the VT of DENV and other arboviruses, with the implication being that overall VT rates are low after DENV oral infection, and therefore low in nature [25].
Table 1

DENV vertical transmission rates and maximum likelihood of infection estimates

Experiment

Virus

Wolb

PPI

Larvae

ALPP

DENV-positive pools/total pools

MLE IR

Oral feeding

 1

DENV-4

0.18

713

8.39

1/85

1.41

+

0.02

556

7.13

0/78

0

Injection

 2

DENV-1

1.00

277

4.07

1/68

3.63

+

0.96

388

4.51

0/86

0

 3

DENV-3

1.00

168

4.42

0/38

0

+

0.97

371

4.52

0/82

0

 4

DENV-4

1.00

274

4.35

3/63

11.16

+

1.00

52

3.47

1/15

19.71

 5

DENV-4

1.00

113

4.71

0/24

0

+

0.96

361

4.40

2/82

5.59

 6

DENV-4

1.00

168

2.67

1/63

5.98

+

1.00

385

4.33

0/89

0

All experiments

All viruses

1.00

1000

3.91

5/256

5.04

+

0.98

1557

4.40

3/354

1.93

Abbreviations: DENV VT vertical transmission of dengue virus rate; Wolb Wolbachia infection status; +, infected; −, uninfected; PPI proportion of parents infected; Larvae, number of larvae; ALPP, average larvae per pool; MLE IR maximum likelihood estimate of infection rate per 1000 larvae; All, data averaged across the 5 injection experiments

Rather than continuing with oral infections, we decided to bypass the midgut barrier and challenge mosquitoes by intrathoracic injection of DENV-1, -3 or -4 to ensure disseminated infection, thereby increasing the chance of VT. Across the five experiments that we performed, the average prevalence was 1.00 for -Wolb mosquitoes, and 0.98 for +Wolb mosquitoes (Fisher’s exact test, P = 0.2605, OR = 0.1829, CI = 0.0093–3.583), indicating that the midgut barrier was a key component in the anti-DENV effects of wMel in Brazilian Ae. aegypti. In comparison, similar injection experiments with the wMelPop strain still demonstrated an anti-viral effect [19].

In spite of this increase in parental DENV prevalence, VT rates were low regardless of the DENV isolate used, or mosquito Wolbachia infection status (Table 1). We found five positive -Wolb pools out of a total of 256 (DENV-1: 1 pool; DENV-4: 4 pools), and three positive +Wolb pools out of 354 (all DENV-4), each of which was associated with a different adult mosquito. Accordingly, MLEs varied greatly between experiments. In two experiments the MLE was higher for +Wolb mosquitoes. This was likely due to the low number of samples collected, with only 15 +Wolb pools collected in the first of these experiments, and 24 -Wolb pools collected without any detectable DENV in the second.

Amalgamated MLEs were calculated for -Wolb and +Wolb across these five experiments in order to gain greater insight into VT rates across a larger data set. As expected, these data indicated that VT rates associated with DENV injection were slightly higher than those seen for DENV oral feeding. The -Wolb amalgamated MLE was 2.60 times higher than the MLE for +Wolb mosquitoes. However, this trend towards lower VT rates associated with wMel infection was not statistically significant, potentially due to the very low frequency of observance (Fisher’s exact test: P = 0.29, OR = 0.4291, CI = 0.1016–1.812). We then screened each of the three +Wolb pools that were positive for DENV for the presence of the Wolbachia wd0513 gene. Two pools were positive for Wolbachia, however we could not detect Wolbachia in one of the pools from DENV-4 experiment two. The mother of this pool was found to be positive for Wolbachia, which suggested that the negative result was either due to incomplete maternal transmission, or technical error. This sample was a pool of five larvae, and given that the maternal transmission rate of wMel is around 99% [14], it is very unlikely that all five larvae were uninfected by Wolbachia. As these pools were screened for the presence of Wolbachia 2.5 years after the initial RNA extraction and DENV quantification was performed, the age of the material may have contributed to the failure to detect Wolbachia in that sample.

Implications for VT in the field

Previous data have indicated that wMel infection leads to an estimated 42% reduction in the prevalence of abdominal DENV infection 14 days after oral infection [4]. The implication of this is that a Wolbachia infection in a mosquito population would greatly reduce the number of individual mosquitoes that could potentially transmit DENV to their progeny. What our data suggest is that for those wMel-infected mosquitoes that do become infected, the presence of the bacterium in the ovaries may serve as a further impediment to viral growth in this organ. Under these circumstances, it is quite likely that the widespread presence of wMel-infected Ae. aegypti in nature would decrease the rate of transovarial transmission of DENV. It is also possible that VT of DENV may occur without viral infection of the ovaries. Our data shows that the presence of Wolbachia affects ovary infection to a greater extent than its impact on VT, which might suggest that these processes are not connected. If this were true, a potential transovarial-independent mechanism of VT could show less sensitivity to the anti-DENV effect of Wolbachia.

Conclusions

We observed that overall VT rates were extremely low, even when the midgut barrier was bypassed to increase viral dissemination rates and the probability of ovary infection. In that sense, our results support the conclusion that VT in the field is quite rare and likely of little epidemiological consequence. However, a more epidemiologically relevant method of determining this would be to examine whether progeny that become infected by VT are capable of transmitting DENV as adults. In our experiments, we observed a trend towards reduced VT rates in Ae. aegypti due to the presence of wMel although this was not statistically significant, likely due to the low overall frequency of VT. Interestingly, we did observe that wMel infection greatly decreased the prevalence of infection and DENV load in mosquito ovaries, which would likely have a significant impact on transovarial VT rates in large mosquito populations in nature. This effect could represent a further benefit associated with the use of Wolbachia-infected Ae. aegypti for DENV control.

Abbreviations

+Wolb: 

wMel-infected Aedes aegypti

DENV: 

Dengue virus

DENV-1/DENV-3/DENV-4: 

Dengue virus serotypes 1, 3 or 4

dpi: 

Days post-infection

EIP: 

Extrinsic incubation period

MIR: 

Minimum infection rate

MLE: 

Maximum likelihood estimate of infection rate

pfu: 

Plaque-forming units

RNA: 

Ribonucleic acid

RT-qPCR: 

Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

VT: 

Vertical transmission

-Wolb: 

Aedes aegypti uninfected by Wolbachia

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Prof Scott L. O’Neill for the donation of the original wMel-infected mosquito line, and Thiago N. Pereira, Dr. Fernanda B. Nogueira, Dr. Fabiano D. Carvalho, and Dr. Marcele N. Rocha for technical assistance.

Funding

This project was funded by the Brazilian Ministery of Health (Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde/ SVS e Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia da Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia e Insumos Estratégicos/DECIT/SCTIE), CAPES, CNPq, and a grant to Monash University through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included in this article and its additional files.

Authors’ contributions

ECP, EPC, JTM and LAM conceived and designed experiments. ECP, EPC and DMA performed experiments. ECP, EPC, JTM and LAM analysed the data. EPC drafted the manuscript. ECP, EPC, JTM and LAM wrote the final manuscript. EPC and LAM supervised the research. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The human blood used in DENV oral infections was drawn from willing adult volunteers by trained medical personnel after obtaining individual written consent. This process was conducted according to established guidelines and approved by The Committee for Ethics in Research (CEP)/ FIOCRUZ (License - CEP 732.621). Human blood was used in accordance with Brazilian laws 196/1996 and 01/1988, which govern human ethics issues in scientific research in compliance with the National Council of Ethics in Research (CONEP).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Grupo Mosquitos Vetores: Endossimbiontes e Interação Patógeno Vetor, Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou – Fiocruz
(2)
Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
(3)
Current address: School of Biological Sciences, Monash University

References

  1. Dengue and severe dengue [http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs117/en/]. Accessed 10 Nov 2016.
  2. Zug R, Hammerstein P. Still a host of hosts for Wolbachia: analysis of recent data suggests that 40% of terrestrial arthropod species are infected. PLoS One. 2012;7:e38544.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Walker T, Johnson PH, Moreira LA, Iturbe-Ormaetxe I, Frentiu FD, McMeniman CJ, et al. A non-virulent Wolbachia infection blocks dengue transmission and rapidly invades Aedes aegypti populations. Nature. 2011;476:450–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ferguson NM, Kien DT, Clapham H, Aguas R, Trung VT, Chau TN, et al. Modeling the impact on virus transmission of Wolbachia-mediated blocking of dengue virus infection of Aedes aegypti. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7:279ra237.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Frentiu FD, Zakir T, Walker T, Popovici J, Pyke AT, van den Hurk A, et al. Limited dengue virus replication in field-collected Aedes aegypti mosquitoes infected with Wolbachia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8:e2688.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Hoffmann AA, Montgomery BL, Popovici J, Iturbe-Ormaetxe I, Johnson PH, Muzzi F, et al. Successful establishment of Wolbachia in Aedes populations to suppress dengue transmission. Nature. 2011;476:454–U107.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Aliota MT, Peinado SA, Velez ID, Osorio JE. The wMel strain of Wolbachia reduces transmission of Zika virus by Aedes aegypti. Sci Rep. 2016;6:28792.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Dutra HL, Rocha MN, Dias FB, Mansur SB, Caragata EP, Moreira LA. Wolbachia blocks currently circulating Zika virus isolates in Brazilian Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. Cell Host Microbe. 2016;19:771–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Aliota MT, Walker EC, Uribe Yepes A, Velez ID, Christensen BM, Osorio JE. The wMel strain of Wolbachia reduces transmission of chikungunya virus in Aedes aegypti. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10:e0004677.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. van den Hurk AF, Hall-Mendelin S, Pyke AT, Frentiu FD, McElroy K, Day A, et al. Impact of Wolbachia on infection with chikungunya and yellow fever viruses in the mosquito vector Aedes aegypti. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6:e1892.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Buckner EA, Alto BW, Lounibos LP. Vertical transmission of key west dengue-1 virus by Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) mosquitoes from Florida. J Med Entomol. 2013;50:1291–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Grunnill M, Boots M. How important is vertical transmission of dengue viruses by mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae)? J Med Entomol. 2016;53:1–19.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Le Goff G, Revollo J, Guerra M, Cruz M, Barja Simon Z, Roca Y, et al. Natural vertical transmission of dengue viruses by Aedes aegypti in Bolivia. Parasite. 2011;18:277–80.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Dutra HL, Dos Santos LM, Caragata EP, Silva JB, Villela DA, Maciel-de-Freitas R, et al. From lab to field: the influence of urban landscapes on the invasive potential of Wolbachia in Brazilian Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9:e0003689.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Caragata EP, Rezende FO, Simões TS, Moreira LA. Diet-induced nutritional stress and pathogen interference in Wolbachia-infected Aedes aegypti. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10:e0005158.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. dos Santos CN, Rocha CF, Cordeiro M, Fragoso SP, Rey F, Deubel V, et al. Genome analysis of dengue type-1 virus isolated between 1990 and 2001 in Brazil reveals a remarkable conservation of the structural proteins but amino acid differences in the non-structural proteins. Virus Res. 2002;90:197–205.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Osanai C, Rosa A, Tang A, Amaral R, Passos A, Tauil P. Surto de dengue em Boa Vista, Roraima. Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo. 1983;25:53–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ye YH, Carrasco AM, Frentiu FD, Chenoweth SF, Beebe NW, van den Hurk AF, et al. Wolbachia reduces the transmission potential of dengue-infected Aedes aegypti. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9:e0003894.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Moreira LA, Iturbe-Ormaetxe I, Jeffery JA, Lu GJ, Pyke AT, Hedges LM, et al. A Wolbachia symbiont in Aedes aegypti limits infection with dengue, chikungunya, and Plasmodium. Cell. 2009;139:1268–78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gu W, Lampman R, Novak R. Problems in estimating mosquito infection rates using minimum infection rate. J Med Entomol. 2003;40:595–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Amuzu HE, McGraw EA. Wolbachia-based dengue virus inhibition is not tissue-specific in Aedes aegypti. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10:e0005145.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Martinez J, Longdon B, Bauer S, Chan YS, Miller WJ, Bourtzis K, et al. Symbionts commonly provide broad spectrum resistance to viruses in insects: a comparative analysis of Wolbachia strains. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1004369.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Osborne SE, Iturbe-Ormaetxe I, Brownlie JC, O'Neill SL, Johnson KN. Antiviral protection and the importance of Wolbachia density and tissue tropism in Drosophila simulans. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78:6922–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Baton LA, Pacidonio EC, Goncalves DS, Moreira LA. wFlu: characterization and evaluation of a native Wolbachia from the mosquito Aedes fluviatilis as a potential vector control agent. PLoS One. 2013;8:e59619.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Thangamani S, Huang J, Hart C, Guzman H, Tesh R. Vertical transmission of Zika virus in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016;95:1169–73.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement