Skip to main content
Download PDF

Control of Rhipicephalus microplus on taurine cattle with fluralaner in a subtropical region

Parasites & Vectors volume 17, Article number: 101 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

In Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, a region with a subtropical climate, Rhipicephalus microplus is present in taurine cattle raised for beef and milk. In addition, ticks resistant to multiple acaricides are present in this region. Recently, fluralaner (isoxazoline) was launched on the market. Thus, there is a need to evaluate the effects of fluralaner for the control of R. microplus on taurine cattle. In addition, occurrence of myiasis by Cochliomyia hominivorax larvae after tick parasitism and weight gain of cattle during the experimental period were evaluated.

Methods

Thirty naturally infested cattle were divided into two experimental groups: T01, treated with fluralaner (2.5 mg/kg) pour-on; T02, control. T01 received fluralaner on Days 0 (early summer in January), 42 and 84 (early autumn), whereas T02, a control group, received palliative treatment with a spray formulation when the group mean was ≥ 30 ticks. Counts of R. microplus females and calculation of the efficacy of fluralaner were performed on Days 3, 7, 14, 28, 35, 42, 56, 70, 84, 98, 112 and 126. The occurrence of myiasis was assessed throughout the study period. In addition, the weight, weight gain and daily weight gain of the animals were evaluated.

Results

In the 12 evaluations performed, the parasitic load of T01 was near zero. Fluralaner showed 99.5% efficacy on the 3rd day after the first treatment and 100% efficacy from Day 7 to Day 126. Cochliomyia hominivorax larvae (n = 6; p = 0.0251) were found only in the control group (T02). At the end of the study, the animals subjected to treatments with fluralaner gained 32.8 kg more than the animals in the control group.

Conclusions

Application of fluralaner in summer and autumn, with 42-day intervals between treatments, was effective to control R. microplus on taurine cattle, which also gained more weight than control cattle. Additionally, no cases of myasis were documented in animals treated with fluralaner.

Graphical Abstract

Background

The tick Rhipicephalus microplus causes severe damage to cattle, especially taurine breeds, in tropical and subtropical areas of the world [1]. High parasitic loads increase the risk of transmission of hemoparasites, leather lesions, myiasis and decreased yield due to spoliation [2, 3]. Depending on the temperature and humidity conditions of the region, this tick can complete three to five generations per year [4,5,6,7].

In Rio Grande do Sul, southern Brazil, the first generation begins in late winter/early spring with low infestation levels, followed by a second generation in the summer with more ticks and another generation in the autumn (i.e. the third generation) with the highest infestation level [8, 9]. Further studies are needed in this region of Brazil, but some population dynamics studies have demonstrated four peaks of infestation in cattle by this ectoparasite throughout the year [9, 10]. In addition, in this region, both beef and dairy cattle are predominantly taurine [11], which further aggravates the level of cattle infestation by R. microplus during the months of the year when the climatic conditions for the development of this ectoparasite are favorable.

The use of acaricides has been the only way to control this tick. This has become another obstacle in the attempt to control this ectoparasite in several countries, including in this region, due to the resistance of R. microplus populations to acaricides. The number of chemical treatments required per year to control this tick in southern Brazil is sometimes higher than in other regions [11,12,13,14]. This fact has triggered reports of ticks resistant to multiple acaricides, especially in southern Brazil, where resistance to pyrethroids, organophosphates, amidines, phenylpyrazoles, macrocyclic lactones and benzophenylureas has been reported [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Therefore, before establishing control, it is necessary to consider the epidemiological aspects of this tick in each region and the history of local acaricide resistance [5, 13, 24, 25].

A recent compound belonging to the isoxazoline class, fluralaner, was developed for the control of ectoparasites of dogs, cats and birds as an alternative to other chemical classes on the market, with results showing high efficacy against parasites of these animals in in vivo tests [26,27,28,29]. Considering the difficulty of cattle tick control in Rio Grande do Sul, this study aimed to evaluate the control of R. microplus in taurine cattle in a region with a subtropical climate using fluralaner to examine the occurrence of myiasis by Cochliomyia hominivorax larvae after tick infestation and to evaluate the weight, weight gain and daily weight gain of cattle during the study period.

Methods

Study site, animals and experimental groups

The study was conducted from January to May 2021 (summer to autumn, 2nd and 3rd tick generations, respectively, according to Evans [8]) on a commercial farm located in the municipality of Uruguaiana (29°50′09″S, 57°06′35″W), Rio Grande do Sul, southern Brazil. According to the temperature and rainfall criteria for the Köppen climate classification, the city of Uruguaiana can be classified as “Cfa”: (C) humid subtropical zone; (f) oceanic climate, without a dry season and (a) with a hot summer [30].

Thirty male Aberdeen angus cattle that were non-castrated, naturally infested by R. microplus and approximately 20 months old, with an average body weight of 315 kg ± 75, were used. These cattle had not received an antiparasitic drug for 70 days prior to the start of the study and were in good health at the beginning of the study. A 20-hectare paddock, also naturally infested by R. microplus, was divided into two equal parts with equivalent shady areas, and the cattle were kept separately in the paddocks throughout the experimental period (126 days). During the study, the animals received native pasture as forage and ad libitum mineral supplementation.

The cattle were allocated to the experimental groups on Day 0 and were randomly assigned to the treatments according to a block design. The formation of blocks was performed based on the arithmetic mean of the number of female ticks (measuring 4.5–8.0 mm in length) counted on 3 consecutive days (days -3, -2 and -1), as recommended by Wharton and Utech [31]. The animals were distributed into 15 blocks containing two cattle each and then randomly allocated into one of the groups (T01 and T02) within each block.

Treatments

Following the premise that tick control should be performed when few ticks are seen on the animals [32, 33], at the beginning of the present study, the animals had an average parasite load of 4.3 ticks/animal. Cattle in group T01 were subjected to three treatments with fluralaner (2.5 mg/kg) pour-on (Exzolt® 5%, MSD Animal Health) on Days 0, 42 and 84 (early summer to early autumn), based on previous results [34]. The interval of 42 days between treatments was determined according to the efficacy results obtained in the registration studies. For animal welfare reasons, animals belonging to T01 would receive palliative treatment if the mean tick counts at any time during the study were ≥ 30 [12]; the palliative treatment consisted of a spray formulation of 125 ppm alphacypermethrin + 400 ppm ethion + 212 ppm chlorpyrifos (Potenty®, MSD, Animal Health). Cattle belonging to T02 were kept as controls. Also for animal welfare reasons, the cattle belonging to this group received this same spray formulation with a combination of pyrethroid and organophosphates whenever the mean tick count of the group was ≥ 30 [12]. All treatments were performed according to the manufacturer’s recommendations.

Tick counts and efficacy

After dividing the groups, counts of R. microplus females measuring between 4.5 and 8.0 mm in length on the left side of each animal and without multiplying by two were performed by the same person and at the same time, according to the methodology proposed by Wharton and Utech [31] on Days 3, 7, 14, 28, 35, 42, 56, 70, 84, 98, 112 and 126.

The acaricidal efficacy was calculated by arithmetic means using the formula recommended by Roulston et al. [35] and adopted by the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock (Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply—MAPA) [36] and Holdsworth et al. [37]:

$${\text{Efficacy}}\,{\text{percentage}} = \left[ {1 - \frac{{{\text{Ta}} \times {\text{Cb}}}}{{{\text{Tb}} \times {\text{Ca}}}}} \right] \times 100$$

where “Ta” is the mean number of female ticks (4.5–8 mm) that were counted on treated animals after the treatment; “Tb” is the mean number of female ticks (4.5–8 mm) that were counted on treated animals during the 3 days preceding the treatment date; “Ca” is the mean number of female ticks (4.5–8 mm) that were counted on untreated control animals after the treatment date; “Cb” is the mean number of female ticks (4.5–8 mm) that were counted on untreated control animals during the 3 days preceding the treatment date.

Detection of myiasis

The occurrence of myiasis caused by C. hominivorax larvae was observed in the body of the animals, after infestation by R. microplus. The C. hominivorax larvae were classified as active (at least one live C. hominivorax larva/lesion), which was identified by the number one (1), or nonactive (zero C. hominivorax larvae/lesion), which was identified by the number zero (0), as described by Lopes et al. [38].

Animals affected by screwworms received treatment with an oil solution containing 30% dichlorfenthion (Mata Bicheira Coopers®, MSD Animal Health, Brazil) at the wound site. In addition, the larvae were removed from the wound site to confirm the identification of C. hominivorax according to the taxonomic criteria described by Spradbery [39].

Weighing of animals

The animals were weighed individually without previous fasting on D0, D70 and D126. In addition, the animals were also weighed on the dates corresponding to the treatments with fluralaner to adjust the dose of the product used. Weight gain and daily weight gain were calculated for each animal considering differences in body weight during the study (D0, D70 and D126). The scales used for weighing the animals had been tested using a previously known weight.

Statistical analysis

Data obtained from the counts of R. microplus females were log transformed using the equation ln (x + 1) and analyzed in an entirely randomized design within each counting date, as the sphericity and orthogonality tests of the data did not allow a split-plot in-time analysis. The data complied with the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variances and residuals. Treatment means for tick counts were compared using the F test.

The presence of viable C. hominivorax larvae in wounds was analyzed using Fisher's exact test, and differences were considered significant when P ≤ 0.05. Regarding body weight, body weight gain and daily body weight gain, the values were compared between the treatments for all evaluation data using the F test. All data were analyzed with a significance level of 5% (P ≤ 0.05) using SAS software [40].

Results

Tick counts and efficacy

From Day 3 to Day 126 of the study, in the 12 tick counts, the treated group had a lower parasite load (ANOVA, F(1, 28) = 2905.57, P < 0.001) than the control group. The efficacy of fluralaner was 99.5% on the 3rd day after the beginning of the study and remained at 100% from the 7th to 126th day after the beginning of the study (Table 1), with no need for palliative treatment in animals belonging to this group. On the other hand, it was necessary to perform palliative treatment with the spray solution for the animals in T02 on the 28th, 56th and 98th days of the study, since the cattle in this group had a high parasite load according to the criteria adopted.

Table 1 Counts of Rhipicephalus microplus females (4.5 to 8 mm in length) present in naturally infested cattle belonging to groups submitted to different control schemes and percentage of effectiveness
Full size table

Myiasis

Active myiasis was found in 6 of 15 animals of the control group (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.01686), which may be attributed to the high parasitic load of R. microplus detected in cattle of this group on D98. One animal showed lesions with C. hominivorax larvae on D98, and myiasis was observed in the other five animals on D112 of the study (Fig. 1). Cochliomyia hominivorax larvae were found in the chest region of infested cattle, where > 30 adult ticks were found. On the same day that the parasites were identified, the larvae were manually removed, and the wounds were treated with 30% dichlorfenthion. No worms were found in animals subjected to control with fluralaner (T01) throughout the study.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Mean count of Rhipicephalus microplus females in naturally infested cattle submitted to different control schemes during 126 study days

Full size image

Animal weighing

The results of the average weight, average weight gain and average daily weight gain are described in Table 2. On Days 0, 70 and 126 of the study, the weights of animals in T01 and T02 were homogeneous. There was no difference (ANOVA F(1,28) = 3.48, P =0.0723) in the mean weight gain from Day 0 to Day 70 of the study between Groups T01 and T02. Between D70 and D126, both groups lost weight. The group treated with fluralaner lost less weight (ANOVA F(1,28) = 18.99, P < 0.001) than the control group, at -17.5 kg and -39.1 kg, respectively. Over 126 days of study, the animals subjected to control with fluralaner (T01) and the control group (T02) showed average weight gains of 45.1 and 12.3 kg (ANOVA F(1,28) = 14.23, P < 0.001), respectively. The daily weight gain did not differ from D0 to D70 (ANOVA F(1,28) = 3.48, P =0.0723) between the fluralaner-treated and control groups. There was daily weight loss between D70 and D126, with a significant difference (ANOVA F(1,28) = 18.99, P < 0.001) between groups. From D0 to D126, the daily weight gain of the group treated with fluralaner was higher (ANOVA F(1,28) = 14.23, P < 0.001) than that of the control group, at 0.36 kg and 0.10 kg, respectively.

Table 2 Statistical analysis regarding weight, weight gain and daily weight gain of cattle submitted to different control schemes against Rhipicephalus microplus during the experimental period of 126 days
Full size table

Discussion

This is the first study conducted with fluralaner in a region of Brazil where there are reports of R. microplus resistant to six chemical classes. Fluralaner was highly efficacious against this tick in the evaluated period, with nearly 100% efficacy in all evaluations performed. In addition, animals treated with fluralaner did not exhibit C. hominivorax myiasis during the study period and gained more weight than those in the control group.

Although three annual tick generations have been reported in the region where the study was carried out, the challenge created by this ectoparasite in animals may be greater in this location because of the favorable climatic conditions for the development of cattle ticks, especially from the summer (January) through the autumn (April and May) [8, 9]. The trend indicates an increasing risk of cattle infestation by this tick, with the highest load recorded in the autumn, which may have clinical consequences, including mortality due to tick-borne pathogens [41]. For example, in regions where R. microplus completes four to five annual generations, four to seven treatments are performed per year [7, 12,13,14]. In the southern region of Brazil, where the present study was conducted, there are reports of 10 to 12 treatments per year to control R. microplus [10]. The reason for this high number of treatments in this region of Brazil may be related to the predominance of taurine cattle, which are highly sensitive to parasitism by R. microplus [11], but also to the adoption of an incorrect strategy by farmers.

The data obtained from the cattle in the control group reinforce previous conclusions about the challenge of controlling R. microplus ticks on cattle. The animals in the control group were affected by screwworm, especially at the time of year when the tick population increases. On the other hand, no cases of screwworm were observed among cattle treated with fluralaner, even during autumn (May), the period with the highest risk from R. microplus in cattle in this region [9, 10]. Similar data were obtained by Reck et al. [3], who found a risk ratio approximately four times greater for an animal to acquire myiasis when highly parasitized by R. microplus.

Another parameter evaluated that highlights the importance of the benefits of control with fluralaner was weight gain throughout the study. Notably, there was a marked weight loss between D70 and D126. A possible reason for this finding was that in the second half of the study period, the region was affected by a drought, with days with high temperatures close to 40 °C. This fact could explain this weight loss, since the absence of rain and increase in temperature led to lower forage availability for the herd and fewer hours of grazing, because the animals sometimes sought out shady areas. However, analyzing the whole period, it was possible to verify that the animals treated with fluralaner gained 32.8 kg more than the cattle in the control group. It is well known that tick infestation has a negative effect on the weight gain of parasitized cattle. Studies have shown that each engorged R. microplus female is responsible for the loss of 1.37 ± 0.25 g bodyweight in taurine cattle [42]. The presence of gastrointestinal nematodes of cattle that also trigger a decrease in weight gain of animals should be highlighted, according to Zapa et al. [43]. In the present study, the presence of these endoparasites in cattle was not evaluated, and for this reason, the difference in weight gain of the animals should be interpreted with caution and not attributed only to cattle ticks.

Tick control protocols in which ticks are exposed to different chemical classes in each generation, called rotation grazing, is recommended in regions where R. microplus has few annual generations, such as where this study was performed. In Rio Grande do Sul, Uruguay and Argentina, a country that borders this region of Brazil, this treatment protocol has already been used and successfully described as a control method [10, 24, 44, 45]. Although the rotational grazing strategy is well studied and established in regions with subtropical climates, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of treatments exclusively with fluralaner to understand how this new molecule behaves in a region with high challenge by R. microplus throughout the year. This study does not intend to recommend sequential treatment with fluralaner throughout the year, which would have potential implications in terms of emergence of acaricidal resistance. Nevertheless, our data indicate that fluralaner may be another alternative to include in rotation with other acaricide groups to control R. microplus on cattle.

In summary, this study demonstrates important results that should be disseminated among veterinarians and technicians in subtropical climate regions. The regimen of three treatments performed with fluralaner pour-on starting during summer was efficacious to control tick infestation on taurine cattle until the autumn, the time of year in which the levels of R. microplus tend to peak in this region. In addition, treatment with the new molecule resulted in the absence of larval infestation due to tick control and greater average weight gain by cattle at the end of the experiment.

Conclusions

The use of fluralaner pour-on at 42-day intervals was efficacious to control of R. microplus on taurine cattle in southern Brazil. In addition, fluralaner prevented the occurrence of screwworms on treated cattle, which also gained more weight compared with untreated cattle.

Availability of data and materials

The data supporting the findings of this study are included in the manuscript and associated files. Raw data are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  1. Tabor AE, Ali A, Rehman G, Rocha Garcia G, Zangirolamo AF, Malardo T, et al. Cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus-host interface: a review of resistant and susceptible host responses. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Grisi L, Leite R, Martins J, Medeiros A, Andreotti R, Villela HS, et al. Reassessment of the potential economic impact of cattle parasites in Brazil. 2014;2961:150–6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Reck J, Marks FS, Rodrigues RO, Souza UA, Webster A, Leite RC, et al. Does Rhipicephalus microplus tick infestation increase the risk for myiasis caused by Cochliomyia hominivorax in cattle? Prev Vet Med. 2014;113:59–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Guglielmone AA, Mangold AJ, Aguirre DH, Gaido AB. Ecological aspects of four species of ticks found on cattle in Salta. Northwest Argentina Vet Parasitol. 1990;35:93–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nava S, Mastropaolo M, Guglielmone AA, Mangold AJ. Effect of deforestation and introduction of exotic grasses as livestock forage on the population dynamics of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) in northern Argentina. Res Vet Sci. 2013;95:1046–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cruz BC, de Lima Mendes AF, Maciel WG, dos Santos IB, Gomes LVC, Felippelli G, et al. Biological parameters for Rhipicephalus microplus in the field and laboratory and estimation of its annual number of generations in a tropical region. Parasitol Res. 2020;119:2421–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nicaretta JE, Zapa DMB, Couto LFM, Heller LM, Cavalcante ASA, Cruvinel LB, et al. Rhipicephalus microplus seasonal dynamic in a Cerrado biome, Brazil: An update data considering the global warming. Vet Parasitol. 2021;296:109506.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Evans DE. Tick infestation of livestock and tick control methods in Brazil: A situation report. Int J Trop Insect Sci. 1992;13:629–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Martins JR, Evans DE, Cereser VH. Partial strategic tick control within a herd of European breed cattle in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, southern Brazil. Exp Appl Acarol. 2002;273:241–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Centenaro FC, Barbieri A, Rico IB, Gonchoroski GZ, Jardim FT, Doyle RL, et al. Rotational and selective protocols using acaricides to control a multi-resistant strain of Rhipicephalus microplus under field conditions in Southern Brazil. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2022;13:101987.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zarth PA. Introdução de novas raças de gado no sul do Brasil (1870–1950). Revista História: Debates e Tendências. 2016;16.

  12. Costa Gomes LV, Lopes WDZ, Teixeira WFP, Maciel WG, Cruz BC, Felippelli G, et al. Population dynamics and evaluation of the partial selective treatment of crossbreed steers naturally infested with Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in a herd from the state of Minas Gerais in Brazil. Vet Parasitol. 2016;220:72–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Felippelli G, Teixeira WFP, Gomes LVC, Maciel WG, Cruz BC, Buzzulini C, et al. Tick infestation level interferes with spray formulation (organophosphate + pyrethroid) efficacy against Rhipicephalus microplus. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2022;13:101903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gomes LVC, Teixeira WFP, Maciel WG, Felippelli G, Buzzulini C, Soares VE, et al. Strategic control of cattle co-parasitized by tick, fly and gastrointestinal nematodes: Is it better to use ecto + endoparasiticide or just endectocide formulations? Vet Parasitol. 2022;301:109622.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fernández-Salas A, Rodríguez-Vivas RI, Alonso-Díaz MÁ. Resistance of Rhipicephalus microplus to Amitraz and Cypermethrin in Tropical Cattle Farms in Veracruz. Mexico Journal of Parasitology. 2012;98:1010–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cuore U, Solari MA. Multiresistant Population of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) Microplus Ticks in Uruguay. Veterinaria. 2014;50:4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Reck J, Klafke GM, Webster A, DallAgnol B, Scheffer R, Souza UA, et al. First report of fluazuron resistance in Rhipicephalus microplus: A field tick population resistant to six classes of acaricides. Vet Parasitol. 2014;201:128–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Souza Higa LO. Acaricide Resistance Status of the Rhipicephalus microplus in Brazil: a literature overview. Med Chem. 2015;5:8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Klafke G, Webster A, Dall Agnol B, Pradel E, Silva J, de La Canal LH, et al. Multiple resistance to acaricides in field populations of Rhipicephalus microplus from Rio Grande do Sul state. Southern Brazil Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2017;8:73–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fular A, Sharma AK, Kumar S, Nagar G, Chigure G, Ray DD, et al. Establishment of a multi-acaricide resistant reference tick strain (IVRI-V) of Rhipicephalus microplus. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2018;9:1184–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rodriguez-Vivas RI, Jonsson NN, Bhushan C. Strategies for the control of Rhipicephalus microplus ticks in a world of conventional acaricide and macrocyclic lactone resistance. Parasitol Res. 2018;117:3–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vilela VLR, Feitosa TF, Bezerra RA, Klafke GM, Riet-Correa F. Multiple acaricide-resistant Rhipicephalus microplus in the semi-arid region of Paraíba State. Brazil Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2020;11:101413.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dzemo WD, Thekisoe O, Vudriko P. Development of acaricide resistance in tick populations of cattle: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heliyon. 2022;8:e08718.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Nava S, Toffaletti JR, Morel N, Guglielmone AA, Mangold AJ. Efficacy of winter–spring strategic control against Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus infestations on cattle in an area with ecological conditions highly favourable for the tick in northeast Argentina. Med Vet Entomol. 2019;33:312–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nicaretta JE, Couto LFM, Heller LM, Ferreira LL, Cavalcante ASA, Zapa DMB, et al. Evaluation of different strategic control protocols for Rhipicephalus microplus on cattle according to tick burden. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2021;12:101737.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Walther FM, Allan MJ, Roepke RK, Nuernberger MC. Safety of fluralaner chewable tablets (Bravecto™), a novel systemic antiparasitic drug, in dogs after oral administration. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Huyghe B, Le Traon G, Flochlay-Sigognault A. Safety of fluralaner oral solution, a novel systemic poultry red mite treatment, for chicken breeders’ reproductive performances. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10:540.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Ranjan S, Young D, Sun F. A single topical fluralaner application to cats and to dogs controls fleas for 12 weeks in a simulated home environment. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:385.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Chiummo R, Petersen I, Plehn C, Zschiesche E, Roepke R, Thomas E. Efficacy of orally and topically administered fluralaner (Bravecto®) for treatment of client-owned dogs with sarcoptic mange under field conditions. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13:524.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Alvares CA, Stape JL, Sentelhas PC, de Moraes Gonçalves JL, Sparovek G. Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorol Z. 2013;22:711–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wharton RH, Utech KBW. The relation between engorgement band dropping of Boophilus microplus (Canestrini) (Ixodidae) to the assessment of tick numbers on cattle. Aust J Entomol. 1970;9:171–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Furlong J. Controle do carrapato dos bovinos na Região Sudeste do Brasil. Cadernos Técnicos da Escola de Veterinária da UFMG. 1993;8:46–61.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Andreotti R, García MV, Koller WW. Carrapatos na cadeia produtiva de bovinos. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. Ministério da Agricultura Pecuária e Abastecimento. Brasília; 2019.

  34. Da Costa AJ, de Souza Martins JR, de Almeida Borges F, Vettorato LF, Barufi FB, de Oliveira Arriero Amaral H, et al. First report of the efficacy of a fluralaner-based pour-on product (Exzolt® 5%) against ectoparasites infesting cattle in Brazil. Parasit Vectors. 2023;16:336.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Roulston WJ, Wharton RH. Acaricide tests on the biarra strain of organophosphorus resistant cattle tick Boophilus microplus from southern queensland. Aust Vet J. 1967;43:129–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Brazil, 1997. Ministério da Agricultura e do Abastecimento. Secretaria de Defesa Agropecuária, Portaria n. 48, 12/05/1997.

  37. Holdsworth P, Rehbein S, Jonsson NN, Peter R, Vercruysse J, Fourie J. World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (WAAVP) second edition: Guideline for evaluating the efficacy of parasiticides against ectoparasites of ruminants. Vet Parasitol. 2022;302:109613.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lopes WDZ, Teixeira WFP, Felippelli G, Cruz BC, Maciel WG, de Matos LVS, et al. Ivermectina e abamectina em diferentes doses e vias de aplicação contra larvas de Cochliomyia hominivorax em bolsas escrotais de bovinos recém-castrados, provenientes da região sudeste do Brasil. Ciência Rural. 2013;43:2195–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Spradbery JP. A manual for the diagnosis of screw-worm fly. Department of Agriculture F& F, editor. Canberra, Australia; 2002.

  40. SAS User´s Guide. Statistics. SAS Institute Inc. 2016.

  41. de Almeida MB, Tortelli FP, Riet-Correa B, Ferreira JLM, Soares MP, Farias NAR, et al. Tick fever in southern Brazil: a retrospective study of 1978–2005. Pesq Vet Bras. 2006;26:237–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Jonsson NN. The productivity effects of cattle tick (Boophilus microplus) infestation on cattle, with particular reference to Bos indicus cattle and their crosses. Vet Parasitol. 2006;137:1–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Zapa DMB, Couto LFM, Heller LM, Cavalcante ASA, Nicaretta JE, Cruvinel LB, et al. Association between fecal egg count and weight gain in young beef cattle. Livest Sci. 2021;89:244.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Nava S, Mangold AJ, Canevari J, Morel N, Guglielmone AA. Strategic treatments with systemic biocides to control Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in northwestern Argentina. InVet. 2014;16:23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Morel N, Signorini ML, Mangold AJ, Guglielmone AA, Nava S. Strategic control of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus infestation on beef cattle grazed in Panicum maximum grasses in a subtropical semi-arid region of Argentina. Prev Vet Med. 2017;144:179–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the agricultural company Vista Alegre de Uruguaiana, which kindly provided the space and animals for the study. We would like to thank Dr. Filipe Dantas-Torres, Editor-in-Chief Parasites & Vectors, for his various comments and suggestions in this manuscript.

Funding

The present work was funded by “MSD Animal Health”, the manufacturer of this formulation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Federal University of Pampa, Uruguaiana, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil

    Tiago Gallina, Camila dos Santos Lagranha, Giancarlo Bilo & Cristiano Malavolta

  2. Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil

    Lorena Lopes Ferreira

  3. Federal University of Mato Grosso Do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso Do Sul, Brazil

    Fernando de Almeida Borges

  4. MSD Animal Health, Montes Claros, Brazil

    Daniel de Castro Rodrigues

  5. MSD Animal Health, Isando, South Africa

    Daniel de Castro Rodrigues & Tom Strydom

  6. Merck Animal Health, Madison, USA

    Siddartha Torres

  7. Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil

    Emmanuel Arnhold & Welber Daniel Zanetti Lopes

Authors
  1. Tiago Gallina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Camila dos Santos Lagranha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Giancarlo Bilo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Cristiano Malavolta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lorena Lopes Ferreira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Fernando de Almeida Borges
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Daniel de Castro Rodrigues
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Tom Strydom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Siddartha Torres
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Emmanuel Arnhold
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Welber Daniel Zanetti Lopes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

TG: project administration, investigation, data curation, writing—original draft. CSL: investigation; CM: investigation; LLF: writing—original draft, review & editing; FAB: writing—original draft, review and editing; TS: supervision, conceptualization; ST: supervision, conceptualization; DCR: supervision, conceptualization; EA: formal analysis; WDZL: formal analysis, writing—original draft, review & editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Welber Daniel Zanetti Lopes.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The project was approved by the Ethics Committee on the Use of Animals (ECUA) of the Federal University of Pampa (UNIPAMPA) (Protocol 021/2020) in accordance with the ethical principles of animal experimentation, execution and use in experiments.

Consent for publication

The authors obtained consent from the responsible authorities at the institution where the work was carried out before the work was submitted.

Competing interests

DCR and TS are employees of MSD Animal Health, which is the manufacturer of Exzolt® 5% (investigational veterinary product). ST is employee of Merck Animal Health.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gallina, T., dos Santos Lagranha, C., Bilo, G. et al. Control of Rhipicephalus microplus on taurine cattle with fluralaner in a subtropical region. Parasites Vectors 17, 101 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-024-06200-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-024-06200-0

Keywords

Parasites & Vectors

ISSN: 1756-3305

Contact us