Skip to main content
Download PDF

Anopheles aquatic development kinetic and adults’ longevity through different seasons in laboratory and semi-field conditions in Burkina Faso

Parasites & Vectors volume 17, Article number: 181 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Anopheles mosquitoes are ectothermic and involved in numerous pathogen transmissions. Their life history traits are influenced by several environmental factors such as temperature, relative humidity and photoperiodicity. Despite extensive investigations of these environmental conditions on vector population ecology, their impact on the different life stages of Anopheles at different seasons in the year remains poorly explored. This study reports the potential impact of these abiotic factors on the immature and adult stages of Anopheles gambiae sensu lato during different seasons.

Methods

Environmental conditions were simulated in the laboratory using incubators to mimic the environmental conditions of two important periods of the year in Burkina Faso: the peak of rainy season (August) and the onset of dry season (December). Eggs from wild An. coluzzii and An. gambiae s.l. were reared separately under each environmental condition. For Anopheles coluzzii or An. gambiae s.l., eggs were equally divided into two groups assigned to the two experimental conditions. Four replicates were carried out for this experiment. Then, egg hatching rate, pupation rate, larval development time, larva-to-pupae development time, adult emergence dynamics and longevity of Anopheles were evaluated. Also, pupae-to-adult development time from wild L3 and L4 Anopheles larvae was estimated under semi-field conditions in December.

Results

A better egg hatching rate was recorded overall with conditions mimicking the onset of the dry season compared to the peak of the rainy season. Larval development time and longevity of An. gambiae s.l. female were significantly longer at the onset of the dry season compared than at the peak of the rainy season. Adult emergence was spread over 48 and 96 h at the peak of the rainy season and onset of dry season conditions respectively. This 96h duration in the controlled conditions of December was also observed in the semi-field conditions in December.

Conclusions

The impact of temperature and relative humidity on immature stages and longevity of An. gambiae s.l. adult females differed under both conditions. These findings contribute to a better understanding of vector population dynamics throughout different seasons of the year and may facilitate tailoring of control strategies.

Graphical Abstract

Background

Most disease vectors are ectothermic insects [1, 2] whose life history traits are modulated by ambient environmental conditions such as temperature, humidity and rainfall. In addition to influencing the vector itself, these environmental conditions can also affect the development of the microorganisms it harbors, impacting their transmission or extinction within the vector. Plasmodium, the malaria parasite, transmitted by Anopheles females, requires approximately 9–14 days to complete its sporogonic development within the mosquito vector [3, 4]. This period, called the extrinsic incubation period (EIP) [5], requires sufficient Anopheles longevity to achieve the transmission of Plasmodium. Before reaching the adult stage, the aquatic stage development of Anopheles occurs in breeding sites. Both the adult and immature mosquitoes are exposed to variable ecological conditions.

In malaria control efforts, several tools, either existing or under development, target different stages of vector development. For example, use of long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs) [6, 7], indoor residual spraying (IRS) [6, 8] and ivermectin [9] focuses on killing adult mosquitoes or reducing their longevity, thus reducing the probability of the completion of parasite’ sporogonic development. Control strategies for aquatic stages are mainly based on application of chemical insecticides [10] or biolarvicides [11,12,13,14,15,16] to the larval breeding sites and to a lesser extent on environmental management [16]. The priority of disease control programs is not only to reduce the survival rate of adult mosquitoes but also to manage the immature stages [17]. Targeting different development stages of Anopheles mosquitoes for control strategies requires a deeper understanding of the impact of environmental factors on the different phases for successful implementation of interventions. Mosquito life history traits are naturally regulated by abiotic and biotic factors. It has been reported that abiotic factors such as temperature and relative humidity play an important role in mosquito survival [18], and a review by Agyekum et al. successfully summarized the influence of temperature and relative humidity on mosquito traits [19]. However, most studies addressing this question have mainly investigated the phenomenon in laboratory conditions (constant temperature and relative humidity), excluding the wide variations of these parameters which occur in the field. Naturally, the regular temperature fluctuations experienced by most insects are more likely to have different effects on their development than exposure to constant temperatures. In addition, since humidity can depend on temperature, the effects of the two factors are closely related and difficult to isolate in the insect's natural environment [20]. Although many studies have explored the effect of temperature and relative humidity on mosquito life traits, there is limited evidence regarding the combined effect of their variation at different periods of the year on aquatic and adult stages of Anopheles. This question is difficult to address in the field because of the lack of precision due to unsuitable conduct of activities and limited temperature ranges where field experiments are undertaken [21]. Thus, Service [22] found that field conditions cannot be easily imitated and controlled laboratory studies are the best way to assess the combined effect of all the different factors on insects.

In the sub-Saharan Africa context, where resources allocated to malaria control are usually limited, the impact of environmental conditions at different times of the year on the aquatic stages of Anopheles (by slowing their development or reducing their density) could be crucial in guiding the methods used to control mosquitoes at these stages. For example, biolarvicides targeting Anopheles aquatic stages have a low persistence over time [16]. A period of the year when Anopheles larvae are developing slowly could be selected for multiple application of these biolarvicides, such as bacteria in the larval habitats, to reach large numbers. Additionally, the adult stages of Anopheles could also be targeted by examining the effect of environmental conditions at different times of the year on their longevity. An unfavorable period for Anopheles density or longevity could be used to intensify the use of vector control methods targeting these transmission parameters for greater impact.

This study aimed to investigate how temperature and relative humidity variation can affect mosquito development rate by mimicking two important seasons in western Burkina Faso: the peak of the rainy season (August) and onset of the dry season (December). To achieve our objective, we used two Anopheles groups, An. coluzzii and An. gambiae s.l., found in Bama and Soumousso respectively. These periods were chosen because mosquito abundance grows substantially at the peak of the rainy season (which occurs in August) and diminishes at the onset of the dry season (which occurs in December). Additionally, the peak of the rainy season is the period during which temperature fluctuations flatten and the ponds refill, while the onset of the dry season is characterized by important daily fluctuations in air temperature and a significant drop in relative humidity [23]. Also, the onset of the dry season is the transitional phase between the rainy season and the dry season, when insects such as mosquitoes undergo morphological and physiological changes to cope with the difficult period [24].

Methods

Selection of time period and environmental parameter simulation inside incubators

Based on the current weather parameters recorded in the village of Bama (Western Burkina Faso) during 4 consecutive years (2009–2012) using a local weather station (Vantage Pro2 weather monitoring station, Weatherlink; Davis Instruments, Hayward, CA, USA). The incubators were calibrated by adjusting the temperature and relative humidity (RH) to cyclically reproduce the environmental conditions in which the mosquitoes were reared. Two main seasons were simulated: the peak of the rainy season (August), corresponding to vector abundance combined with the highest transmission of Plasmodium, and the onset of the dry season (December) during which a relative decrease in the number of vectors was observed in the natural setting [25, 26]. In the IRSS laboratory, environmental conditions were simulated to mimic these two climatic periods inside two incubators (Sanyo MLR 315H, Sanyo Electric Co., Osaka, Japan). Thus, temperature and relative humidity (RH) cycles were programmed inside the climate chambers based on hourly recorded data in the village of Bama using a Vantage Pro2 weather monitoring station (Weatherlink; Davis Instruments, Hayward, CA, USA) for August and December [27]. In Bama village, these two parameters remain almost constant during the August period while important variations are observed between night and day in December (Fig. 1). For each period, hourly average temperature and RH were programmed to complete the daily weather cycle. We designed a 12-step cycle to be as close as possible to the natural daily climatic fluctuations in the climate chambers. A photoperiod of 12:12 h light/dark cycle was performed for all experiments because the minimal variations in photoperiod are observed in the tropics. About 1 h and 15 min day length variation is recorded between the solstices in Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina-Faso, requiring the same photoperiod for the peak of the rainy season and onset of the dry season [23].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Hourly mean variation of temperature and relative humidity recorded during the months of August (peak of the rainy season) and December (onset of the dry season) in the village of Bama (western Burkina Faso). These data provide mean values from local records during a 4-year period (2009–2012). These values were reproduced in the incubators to simulate environmental conditions during the months of August (at the left) and December (at the right)

Full size image

Source of mosquitoes

The mosquitoes used for this study originate from F1 generation of wild Anopheles species (An. coluzzii, An. gambiae and An. arabiensis). F1 generation was obtained from wild blood-fed, semi-gravid and gravid An. gambiae s.l. collected during rainy season using a mouth aspirator in human dwellings in the rural localities of Bama and Soumousso. Both localities are located about 30 km and 50 km from Bobo-Dioulasso respectively. Anopheles mosquitoes from Bama are known to be essentially An. coluzzii, while in Soumousso, An. coluzzii, An. gambiae and An. arabiensis are found [28, 29]. All collected mosquitoes, morphologically identified as belonging to An. gambiae s.l. using the morphological keys of Giles and Coetzee (1987) [30], were kept in cages at the IRSS insectary (27 ± 2 ℃, 70 ± 5% relative humidity, 12:12 light/dark). They were supplied with 10% glucose solution ad libitum on cotton wool for about 3 days, the required time allowing egg development and the maximum number of females to lay eggs in Petri dishes lined with humid filter paper disks. After they laid eggs, wild-caught An. gambiae s.l. females were further identified to the species level using the SINE PCR [31].

Mosquito rearing procedures in simulated environmental conditions

The collected eggs of Anopheles from different localities were equally divided into two groups for mosquito rearing in the two experimental conditions (August and December) inside incubators. For each experimental group, about 200 eggs were manually pooled under a stereomicroscope and transferred to plastic trays containing 1 l water that had been previously kept inside climatic chambers so that it was at an optimal temperature for each environmental condition. The emerged early-stage larvae were counted on the 3rd and 4th day after egg immersion. Subsequently, the larvae were transferred into other trays where they were reared using local spring water, which was changed every other day. Larvae were fed ad libitum with Tetramin® Baby Fish Food (borehamwood, London, UK). Dead larvae were removed daily from each experimental group until the first pupae appeared. Pupae were counted daily and transferred into plastic cups, half-filled with spring water, and placed into cages for emergence into the climatic chambers. From this stage, the number of emerged mosquitoes was recorded every day. The non-emerged pupae after 24 h were placed in a new cage, taking care to remove the dead ones. This process was performed until all pupae emerged. Ten plastic trays were used per condition owing to five per locality. This experiment was conducted twice.

Different performance metrics across different transitions were recorded including egg hatching rate, larvae-to-pupae development time, pupae appearance dynamics, pupation rate, pupae-to-adult development time and adult longevity from An. gambiae s.l. The position of the trays was alternatively changed inside the climate chambers every 2 day in the morning to prevent any potential effect of the tray position. Furthermore, incubators were rotated between replicates to eliminate any relative effects.

Estimating mosquito longevity in environmental simulated conditions

Adult An. gambiae s.l. mosquitoes collected from the experiments described above were used to estimate mosquito longevity in each experimental group. One day post-emergence, about 30 Anopheles females were sampled for each experimental group, kept in a plastic cup (V = 473 cm3) and maintained in incubator conditions with a sugar meal of 10% glucose ad libitum. Every morning, dead mosquitoes were recorded for each experimental group until all individuals were dead. Twenty (20) plastic cups containing approximately 30 mosquitoes were used for each experimental group. The same design was used for the experimental replicate. About 5% of the F1 generation from wild mosquitoes was molecularly analyzed to confirm the three species in the Anopheles population. Any random effect such as plastic cup position and climatic chambers was avoided by proceeding as described in the previous section.

Measuring mosquito emergence in semi-field conditions in the December period

Based on our observations that the development time from pupae to adult Anopheles is very slow in December compared to August (similar to the literature reports) in incubators, it was interesting to better clarify this question through additional investigation in the semi-field environment to control some parameters. Therefore, we conducted similar experiments in the semi-field conditions focusing on the pupae-to-adult development time and adult dynamics emergence during the month of December. The assays were thus conducted in a malaria-sphere in which mosquitoes were exposed to all environmental factors including temperature and RH while keeping the Anopheles in the malaria-sphere, an enclosed environment. This facility is located in Bama village where the IRSS team conducted previous research focused on mosquito ecology [32]. In practice, an important quantity of Anopheles larvae (L3 and L4 stage) was collected from the breeding sites in Bama villages in December 2021. Then, they were kept in plastic trays in the malaria-sphere under the influence of environmental factors and fed ad libitum with Tetramin® Baby Fish Food (Borehamwood, London, UK). During pupation, about 500 pupae were placed in plastic cups with spring water and kept in cages covered with a mosquito net. Every 24 h, the numbers of emerged adults and remaining pupae were counted; dead pupae were also recorded and removed. This experiment was replicated four times throughout the entire month of December.

Statistical analyses

All data analyses were carried out using R software (version 4.0.2). Egg hatching, pupation and emergence rate respectively, defined as the proportion of eggs transformed into first instar (L1) larval stage, the proportion of larvae transformed into pupae and the proportion of pupae that successfully developed into adults, were calculated. Mean larval-to-pupal development time, defined as average time taken by larvae to transform into pupae, was also determined. Logistic regression by generalized mixed linear models (GLMM, binomial errors, logit link; lme4 package) was used to test the effects of condition and Anopheles groups on the egg hatching, pupation and emergence rates. The full model of GLMM included conditions and Anopheles groups as fixed effects and replicates as random effect. Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney test (non-parametric test) was performed to compare mean larval-to-pupal development time between two different conditions. Kaplan-Meier survival was used to carry out Anopheles aquatic development dynamics. Only larvae transformed into pupae were included in this analysis. To determine the variation in daily survivorship of adult Anopheles kept in two conditions, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed. A Cox regression (proportional hazard model) was used to assess the effects of condition and species on Anopheles survival.

Results

Effect of climatic conditions of August and December on eggs hatching

In total > 1000 wild adult Anopheles females were collected from Bama and 1260 from Soumousso, so the population likely contains a diverse genetic background for egg laying. All Anopheles females from Bama were An. coluzzii, in line with many previous works [28, 29], while three Anopheles species were identified for Soumousso females at various proportions: 51.6% An. gambiae, 38.2% An. arabiensis and 10.2% An. coluzzii. Overall, the environment parameter (temperature and RH variation) significantly affected mosquito egg development. When exposed to December conditions characterized by greater temperature and RH variation (mean temperature: 23 ± 1.11 ℃; mean RH: 71% ± 1.90%), the eggs had a high hatching rate compared to those under August conditions (mean temperature: 26 ± 0.35 ℃; mean RH: 78 ± 0.37%), independently of Anopheles group: 69% (95% CI 66–71) vs. 61% (95% CI 58–63) (likelihood ratio test: LRT, X2 = 18.36, df = 1, P < 0.001). The effect of environmental conditions on egg development was more important for both An. coluzzii and An. gambiae s.l. Indeed, both An. coluzzii and An. gambiae s.l. eggs were observed to have significantly higher development in December than in August conditions (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Eggs hatching rate of An. coluzzii and An. gambiae s.l. under August (peak of the rainy season) and December (onset of the dry season) conditions. Letters indicate groups that were significantly different. ***Significant difference between August and December

Full size image

Kinetics of larval development to pupae

Anopheles aquatic development dynamics performed using Kaplan-Meier survival analyses revealed significant differences between the two conditions (LRT, X2 = 52.8, df = 1, P < 0.001). After eggs hatched, the development of larvae required a longer time in December compared to August conditions (10 days vs. 6 days as minimal period) before the appearance of the first pupae. For Anopheles the mean duration of larval development from L1 stage to pupation was significantly shorter under August conditions than in December (11.87 ± 0.12 days vs. 13.82 ± 0.15 days; W = 73863; P < 0.001). In the An. gambiae s.l. group, a similar trend was seen with significantly faster development of larvae under August conditions than December conditions (11.98 ± 0.16 days vs. 14.77 ± 0.22 days; W = 15273; P < 0.001; Fig. 3A). From larva stage, the dynamics of the appearance of Anopheles pupae was faster under August than December conditions. Indeed, in August conditions, pupation started early with short duration (7–16 days post-egg hatching, shaded area) whereas the first pupae appeared later with long pupation time in December conditions (11–24 days post-eggs hatching, shaded area). Whatever the conditions, the pupae started appearing simultaneously for both An. coluzzii and An. gambiae s.l., with relatively shorter duration and less variability within the population of An. coluzzii (Fig. 3B).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Larval development time (A) and temporal dynamics of the pupation (B) for the two simulated periods (August and December). Letters indicate groups that were significantly different, and day 0 corresponds to the day on which first instar larvae L1 were counted. ***Significant difference between August and December

Full size image

Pupation and the dynamics of adult emergence

For the population of 1562 larvae resulting from An. coluzzii and An. gambiae s.l. egg hatching, temperatures and RH variation overall influenced the larval pupation. Conversely to egg hatching rate, the pupation rate was increased in Anopheles exposed to August conditions compared with their counterparts under December conditions, independently of Anopheles group [64% (95% CI 61–68) vs. 51% (95% CI 47–54); LRT, X2 = 28, df = 1, P < 0.001]. Anopheles coluzzii exhibited better pupation in August than in December conditions (LRT, X2 = 24.24, df = 1, P < 0.001). The same finding was found in An. gambiae s.l. between the two conditions (LRT, X2 = 6.33, df = 1, P = 0.01; Fig. 4A).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Larvae pupation rate (A) and emergence dynamics of An. gambiae s.l. (B) under the two simulated periods (August and December). Letters indicate groups that were significantly different. ***Significant difference between August and December

Full size image

The time required by pupae metamorphosis to emerge into mosquito adult in each experimental group revealed two main periods for specimens reared in the laboratory independently of Anopheles group (Fig. 4B). While all pupae almost emerged in 24 h under August conditions, Anopheles adults have been recorded an additional 48 h later for those incubated in December conditions.

Like the dynamic of adult emergence in the laboratory, the same trend was observed for the wild An. coluzzi in semi-natural conditions in December. Indeed, 2093 pupae collected in the larval breeding sites in Bama and preserved in the malaria-sphere emerged as adults in 48 h and 72 h (Fig. 4B). For both laboratory-reared and wild mosquitoes, some pupae (< 2%) remained until 96 h before they emerged as adults under December conditions.

Effect of different conditions on An. gambiae s.l. longevity

As expected, An. gambiae, An. arabiensis and An. coluzzii were found in the F1 generation population of An. gambiae s.l. (47.4, 12.3 and 40.4% respectively). Anopheles females exposed to December conditions survived longer than those maintained in August conditions (LRT, X2 = 12.3, df = 1, P < 0.001; Fig. 5). Considered separately, An. coluzzii and An. gambiae s.l. showed significantly higher survival under December conditions than their counterparts under August conditions. In contrast to environmental dependence, mosquito survival was not associated with the Anopheles groups (LRT, X2 = 0.17, df = 1, P = 0.67). However, An. coluzzii and An. gambiae s.l. survived better in the right age range for Plasmodium transmission in the field (9–21 days). There was no significant interaction between Anopheles groups and environmental conditions (LRT, X2 = 0.95, df = 1, P = 0.33). When considering the Anopheles groups separately in the analyses, the environmental conditions affected the survival of An. coluzzii (LRT, X2 = 9.02, df = 1, P = 0.002) and An. gambiae s.l. (LRT, X2 = 11.2, df = 1, P < 0.001). Considering 9 days as the threshold age for Anopheles vectors to be infectious for Plasmodium transmission [3, 4], > 80% of mosquitoes achieved this age regardless of Anopheles group and environmental conditions.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Effect of simulated temperature and relative humidity mimicking the environmental conditions of the periods of August (blue lines) and December (red lines) on Anopheles mosquitoes’ survival

Full size image

Discussion

This study explores the combined effect of temperature and relative humidity variations on An. gambiae s.l. development dynamics using two important periods (peak of the rainy season and onset of the dry season corresponding to August and December respectively). Some key life history traits of the Anopheles were assessed including egg hatching rate, dynamics of pupal appearance, larval development time, pupation rate, pupae-to-adult time and adult longevity. Overall, egg hatching was more successful under December than August conditions. These results suggest that December conditions characterized by higher fluctuating temperatures (15–32 ℃) and relative humidity (57.5–82.5%) provided a favorable environment for embryo development. A previous study showed that successful hatching of the eggs requires optimal development of the embryo [33]. The relatively high and almost constant temperatures and RH (24.5–28.5 ℃ and 76–80%) recorded in August led to an estimated reduction in the egg hatching rate of up to 45%. This suggests that the optimal development of the embryo is due to lower temperatures and RH. Also, for both An. coluzzii and An. gambiae s.l., the egg hatching rate was higher in December than in August conditions. Although this finding was obtained in the laboratory, it could be the same in the wild. This suggests rigorous environmental clean-up before December to eliminate vector oviposition sites.

In contrast, the development from larvae to pupae and the dynamics of pupal appearance were faster under August than December conditions regardless of Anopheles group. Similarly, pupation proportion was higher in August than in December. Specifically, under August conditions, first pupae appeared in 7 days with a high pupation rate, whereas in December conditions, first pupae occurred in 11 days with a low pupation rate, whatever Anopheles group. Additionally, pupae-to-adult time was spread over 48 h and 96 h under August and December conditions respectively. These observations suggest that August conditions with relatively higher temperatures and RH offer better larval development compared to December conditions. This could explain at least partially the higher anopheline population density observed in the natural environment during the August period, even though this density is more likely to be driven by the greater availability of breeding sites and nutrients favorable to larval development compared with December conditions. According to other studies, these temperature and relative humidity (RH) ranges (24.5–28.5 ℃ and 76–80%) observed under August conditions are optimal for the immature stage development to adult emergence [34, 35].

The mean larval-to-pupae development time reported under August conditions is similar to the values (11.5 days) found by Holstein since 1954 in the same locality [36]. In the same study, pupae-to-adult time was reported to spread over 48 h during the rainy season. The similarities in the finding between the two studies indicate that simulated environmental conditions in the laboratory can provide information from the field conditions. The findings revealed that pupae-to-adult time was spread over 4 days under controlled conditions of December programmed in the laboratory incubators. This same trend was found in the semi-field conditions in December, providing some support to the use of extrapolated laboratory results for the natural environment. Nevertheless, this verification was only done for one of the many experiments conducted in the laboratory, so care should be taken when extrapolating these results as they have not been validated in semi-field settings.

Overall, female Anopheles placed under December conditions (temperature from 15 to 32 ℃ and relative humidity from 57.5 to 82.5%) survived longer than those exposed to August conditions. This finding remained consistent when An. coluzzii and An. gambiae s.l. were considered separately in the analyses. December conditions are associated with cooler temperatures and lower relative humidity compared to August conditions, suggesting a relative tolerance of these mosquitoes to the abiotic factors present in December. A tolerance of the specimens to the December conditions would allow them better longevity. The high longevity observed in Anopheles female mosquitoes might also be attributed to an accumulation of lipid reserves that can allow mosquitoes to cope with acute drought conditions. It has been established that a significant accumulation of lipids leads to a hypertrophy of the fat body, and this mechanism increases survival in hibernating Culex pipiens females [37], which are holometabolous insects like Anopheles mosquitoes. The relationship between cooler temperatures and longevity could be explained in two ways. First, cooler temperatures could increase longevity by reducing the reaction rate of various metabolic processes that affect development and life history [38]. Second, lower temperatures could mitigate damage caused by metabolic by-products, such as reactive oxygen species [38]. Our findings related to mosquito longevity were in agreement with several previous studies. For instance, Hidalgo et al. [23] reported that the population of the complex An. gambiae reared under the onset of the dry season conditions (like December in Burkina Faso) lived longer than those reared under the peak of the rainy season conditions (August). According to these authors, the extended lifespan found at the onset of the dry season occurs because Anopheles enter a state of aestivation to overcome the long dry period. Mosquito longevity reported in this study may be underestimated because the specimens were not blood-fed. Indeed, it is reported that An. gambiae s.s. females fed with a combination of glucose and blood survived longer than those only fed with glucose [8]. We reported here that > 80% of mosquitoes survive beyond the threshold required for Plasmodium transmission, whatever the season. This value should be treated as illustrative as most mosquitoes will not be infected the day they emerge, and wild mosquitoes are likely to suffer substantially higher mortality than that observed in the laboratory. Nevertheless, this greater longevity could contribute to the high intensity of Plasmodium transmission recorded in the field from the peak of the rainy season to the onset of the dry season, as described by other authors [25]. This therefore stresses the need to reduce mosquito survival by using LLINs and IRS during these periods.

Although this study was not carried out in natural environments, it provided understanding of how Anopheles life history traits respond to two different environmental conditions of the year. Indeed, the development of the aquatic stages of Anopheles is considerably slowed down in December. Therefore, this period could be targeted by local control programs to multiply the application of biolarvicides in the few larval breeding sites still available at this time. Furthermore, Anopheles longevity is higher in December conditions. This should guide vector control programs in sensitizing the population for intensive use of adult mosquito control tools in December such as impregnated mosquito nets, which aim to reduce the longevity of Anopheles.

While our study has provided relevant findings, it would be interesting to envisage further studies considering a maximum number of dry and rainy season months.

Conclusions

Anopheles coluzzii and An. gambiae s.l., from their immature to adult stages, were artificially exposed to two environmental conditions (temperature and relative humidity) simulating the peak of the rainy season (August) and onset of the dry season (December) in western Burkina Faso. Results revealed a high egg hatching rate, low dynamics of pupal appearance, slow larval development, slow pupae to adult time and high mosquito survival under onset of the dry season conditions compared to the peak of the rainy season conditions. These findings are useful for building a robust understanding of malaria vector populations dynamics at different times of the year to design tailored vector control strategies.

Availability of data and materials

The data supporting the findings of the study is available in the Additional File 1.

References

  1. Crill WD, Huey RB, Gilchrist GW. Within-and between-generation effects of temperature on the morphology and physiology of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution. 1996;50:1205–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Beck-Johnson LM, Nelson WA, Paaijmans KP, Read A, Thomas MB, Bjørnstad ON, et al. The importance of temperature fluctuations in understanding mosquito population dynamics and malaria risk. R Soc Open Sci. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160969.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Killeen GF, McKenzie FE, Foy BD, Schieffelin C, Billingsley PF, Beier JC, et al. A simplified model for predicting malaria entomologic inoculation rates based on entomologic and parasitologic parameters relevant to control. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2000;62:535–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Koella JC, Zaghloul L. Using evolutionary costs to enhance the efficacy of malaria control via genetically manipulated mosquitoes. Parasitology. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182007000261.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Guissou E, Waite JL, Jones M, Bell AS, Suh E, Yameogo KB, et al. A non-destructive sugar-feeding assay for parasite detection and estimating the extrinsic incubation period of Plasmodium falciparum in individual mosquito vectors. Sci Rep. 2021;11:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Faiman R, Solon-Biet S, Sullivan M, Huestis DL, Lehmann T. The contribution of dietary restriction to extended longevity in the malaria vector Anopheles coluzzii. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10:156.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Christiansen-Jucht C, Parham PE, Saddler A, Koella JC, Basáñez M-G. Temperature during larval development and adult maintenance influences the survival of Anopheles gambiae s.s. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:489.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Okech BA, Gouagna LC, Killeen GF, Knols BGJ, Kabiru EW, Beier JC, et al. Influence of sugar availability and indoor microclimate on survival of Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae) under semifield conditions in western Kenya. J Med Entomol. 2003;40:657–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lyimo IN, Kessy ST, Mbina KF, Daraja AA, Mnyone LL. Ivermectin-treated cattle reduces blood digestion, egg production and survival of a free-living population of Anopheles arabiensis under semi-field condition in south-eastern Tanzania. Malar J. 2017;16:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Guilbot R. Exemples de lutte biologique en milieux urbain et péri-urbain. Courrier de la cellule environnement Inra. 1991;13:30–4.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Aouinty B, Oufara S, Mellouki F, Mahari S. Évaluation préliminaire de l’activité larvicide des extraits aqueux des feuilles du ricin (Ricinus communis l.) et du bois de thuya (Tetraclinis articulata (vahl) mast.) sur les larves de quatre moustiques culicidés: Culex pipiens (Linné), Aedes caspius (Pallas) Culiseta longiareolata (Aitken) et Anopheles maculipennis (Meigen). Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ. 2006;10:67–71.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Foko D, Ascension M, Lebel J. Effet insecticide de l’huile essentielle des graines de Aframomum sulcatum (Oliv. & D. Hanb. Ex Baker) K. Schum. sur les stades aquatiques de Anopheles gambiae Giles 1902, vecteur du paludisme. Sci Ser. 2016;6:69–80.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Iro SM, Soma DD, Maiga AA, Kientega M, HIma K, Ali D, et al. Etude au laboratoire de l’activité larvicide de Bacillus thuringiensis Israelensis et de Bacillus sphaericus dans la perspective d’un contrôle biologique des larves de Culex pipens et d’Anopheles gambiae s.l. au Niger. Int J Adv Res. 2022;10:1004–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vantaux A, Ouattarra I, Lefèvre T, Dabiré KR. Effects of larvicidal and larval nutritional stresses on Anopheles gambiae development, survival and competence for Plasmodium falciparum. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dambach P, Louis VR, Kaiser A, Ouedraogo S, Sié A, Sauerborn R, et al. Efficacy of Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis against malaria mosquitoes in northwestern Burkina Faso. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:371.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Carnevale P, Robert V, et al. Les anophèles Biologie, transmission du Plasmodium et lutte antivectorielle. IRD Editio. 2009. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.irdeditions.10374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hugo LE, Jeffery JAL, Trewin BJ, Wockner LF, Thi Yen N, Le NH, et al. Adult survivorship of the dengue mosquito Aedes aegypti varies seasonally in Central Vietnam. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002669.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Bates M. Ecology of anopheline mosquitoes. Malariology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Agyekum TP, Botwe PK, Arko-Mensah J, Issah I, Acquah AA, Hogarh JN, et al. A systematic review of the effects of temperature on Anopheles mosquito development and survival: implications for malaria control in a future warmer climate. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Unwin DM, Corbet SA. Insects, plants and microclimate. Oxford: Richmond Publishing Company Ltd.; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lefèvre T, Vantaux A, Dabire KR, Mouline K, Cohuet A. Non-genetic determinants of mosquito competence for malaria parasites. PLoS Pathog. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003365.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Service MW. Sampling the larval population. Mosquito ecology: Field sampling methods. 1993;75–209.

  23. Hidalgo K, Mouline K, Mamai W, Foucreau N, Dabiré KR, Bouchereau A, et al. Novel insights into the metabolic and biochemical underpinnings assisting dry-season survival in female malaria mosquitoes of the Anopheles gambiae complex. J Insect Physiol. 2014;70:102–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mouline K, Mamai W, Agnew P, Tchonfienet M, Brengues C, Dabire R, et al. Physiology and development of the M and S molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae in Burkina Faso (West Africa). Med Vet Entomol. 2012;26:447–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bationo CS, Lokossou V, Landier J, Sylla B, Tougri G. Geo-epidemiology of malaria in Burkina Faso. 2021; 2013–2018

  26. Dabiré RK, Namountougou M, Sawadogo SP, Yaro LB, Toé HK, Ouari A, et al. Population dynamics of Anopheles gambiae s.l. in Bobo-Dioulasso city: bionomics, infection rate and susceptibility to insecticides. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:127.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Gimonneau G, Pombi M, Dabiré RK, Diabaté A, Morand S, Simard F, et al. Behavioural responses of Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto M and S molecular form larvae to an aquatic predator in Burkina Faso. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nignan C, Poda BS, Sawadogo SP, Maïga H, Dabiré KR, Gnankine O, et al. Local adaptation and colonization are potential factors affecting sexual competitiveness and mating choice in Anopheles coluzzii populations. Sci Rep. 2022;12:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gillies MT, Coetzee M. A supplement to the Anophelinae of Africa South of the Sahara. Publ S Afr Inst Med Res. 1987;55:1–143.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Santolamazza F, Mancini E, Simard F, Qi Y, Tu Z, della Torre A, et al. Insertion polymorphisms of SINE200 retrotransposons within speciation islands of Anopheles gambiae molecular forms. Malar J. 2008;7:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mamai W, Simard F, Couret D, Ouedraogo GA, Renault D, Dabiré KR, et al. Monitoring dry season persistence of Anopheles gambiae s.l. populations in a contained semi-field system in southwestern Burkina Faso, West Africa. J Med Entomol. 2016;53:130–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. De Carvalho SC, De Jesus A, Lima JB, Valle D. Temperature influence on embryonic development of Anopheles albitarsis and Anopheles aquasalis. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2002;97:1117–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ezeakacha NF, Yee DA. The role of temperature in affecting carry-over effects and larval competition in the globally invasive mosquito Aedes albopictus. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12:123.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Danlami G, Isah B, Odeyemi MO, Ukubuiwe AC, Mustapha OM. Indoor behaviour responses of the principal malaria vector, Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae), in relation to micro-climatic conditions in Minna, North Central Nigeria. J Parasitol. 2011;6:109–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. M. H. Holstein. Research in french West Africa. Biology of research in french West Africa. World Health Organization Monograph Series. 1954;171.

  36. Arrese EL, Soulages JL. Insect fat body: energy, metabolism, and regulation. Annu Rev Entomol. 2010;55:207–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Keil G, Cummings E, de Magalhães JP. Being cool: how body temperature influences ageing and longevity. Biogerontology. 2015;16:383–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Soma DD, Zogo B, Taconet P, Somé A, Coulibaly S, Baba-Moussa L, et al. Quantifying and characterizing hourly human exposure to malaria vectors bites to address residual malaria transmission during dry and rainy seasons in rural Southwest Burkina Faso. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Centre d’Excellence Africain en Innovations Biotechnologiques pour l’Elimination des Maladies à transmission vectorielle (CEA-ITECH/MTV) and the residents of Bama and Soumousso for their sincere cooperation during mosquito collection.

Funding

The work was supported by the UK Medical Research Foundation Project Grant (MRF-RG-ICCH-2022–100021).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Nicaise D. C. Djègbè and Dari F. Da are co-lead authors.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Direction Régionale, 399 avenue de la liberte, 01 BP 545, Bobo-Dioulasso 01, Burkina Faso

    Nicaise D. C. Djègbè, Dari F. Da, Bernard M. Somé, Lawata Inès G. Paré, Fatoumata Cissé, Simon P. Sawadogo & Roch K. Dabiré

  2. Université Nazi Boni, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso

    Nicaise D. C. Djègbè, Bernard M. Somé, Lawata Inès G. Paré & Fatoumata Cissé

  3. Institut de Recherche Agricole pour le Développement (IRAD), PO. Box 2123, Yaoundé, Cameroon

    Wadaka Mamai

  4. MIVEGEC, Montpellier University, IRD, CNRS, Montpellier, France

    Karine Mouline

  5. Medical Research Council Centre for Global Infections Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK

    Joseph D. Challenger & Thomas S. Churcher

Authors
  1. Nicaise D. C. Djègbè
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dari F. Da
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bernard M. Somé
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lawata Inès G. Paré
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Fatoumata Cissé
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wadaka Mamai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Karine Mouline
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Simon P. Sawadogo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Joseph D. Challenger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Thomas S. Churcher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Roch K. Dabiré
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

NDCD, DFD and RKD conceived and designed the study. NDCD, DFD and LIGP conducted the laboratory and field work. NDCD, BMS and FC conducted the molecular analysis. NDCD, JDC and TSC were responsible for the data analysis. NDCD and DFD wrote the first draft of the manuscript. BMS, FC, MW, KM, SPS, JDC, TSC and RKD reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Nicaise D. C. Djègbè or Dari F. Da.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The project received approval from the local institutional ethics committee: Reference number: A014-2022/CEIRES.

Consent for publication

Not applicable..

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Djègbè, N.D.C., Da, D.F., Somé, B.M. et al. Anopheles aquatic development kinetic and adults’ longevity through different seasons in laboratory and semi-field conditions in Burkina Faso. Parasites Vectors 17, 181 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-024-06260-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-024-06260-2

Keywords

Parasites & Vectors

ISSN: 1756-3305

Contact us