Skip to main content
Download PDF

Insights and challenges of insecticide resistance modelling in malaria vectors: a review

Parasites & Vectors volume 17, Article number: 174 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Malaria is one of the most devastating tropical diseases, resulting in loss of lives each year, especially in children under the age of 5 years. Malaria burden, related deaths and stall in the progress against malaria transmission is evident, particularly in countries that have moderate or high malaria transmission. Hence, mitigating malaria spread requires information on the distribution of vectors and the drivers of insecticide resistance (IR). However, owing to the impracticality in establishing the critical need for real-world information at every location, modelling provides an informed best guess for such information. Therefore, this review examines the various methodologies used to model spatial, temporal and spatio-temporal patterns of IR within populations of malaria vectors, incorporating pest-biology parameters, adopted ecological principles, and the associated modelling challenges.

Methods

The review focused on the period ending March 2023 without imposing restrictions on the initial year of publication, and included articles sourced from PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. It was also limited to publications that deal with modelling of IR distribution across spatial and temporal dimensions and excluded articles solely focusing on insecticide susceptibility tests or articles not published in English. After rigorous selection, 33 articles met the review's elibility criteria and were subjected to full-text screening.

Results

Results show the popularity of Bayesian geostatistical approaches, and logistic and static models, with limited adoption of dynamic modelling approaches for spatial and temporal IR modelling. Furthermore, our review identifies the availability of surveillance data and scarcity of comprehensive information on the potential drivers of IR as major impediments to developing holistic models of IR evolution.

Conclusions

The review notes that incorporating pest-biology parameters, and ecological principles into IR models, in tandem with fundamental ecological concepts, potentially offers crucial insights into the evolution of IR. The results extend our knowledge of IR models that provide potentially accurate results, which can be translated into policy recommendations to combat the challenge of IR in malaria control.

Graphical Abstract

Background

Global malaria cases have gradually increased, with records showing an estimated rise of 232, 247, 245 and 261 million cases in 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022, respectively [1, 2]. Despite the different control strategies for malaria prevention, the estimated number of deaths in the same period were 568,000, 619,000, 625,000 and 710,000 in 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022, respectively [1, 2]. Moreover, trends reveal a stall in the progress against malaria transmission in countries that have moderate or high malaria transmission, due to intrinsic obstacles [e.g. insecticide resistance (IR)] encountered while using the available malaria control tools and strategies [3, 4].

In Africa, National Malaria Control Programmes (NMCPs) have developed strategic plans on the basis of World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations, which guide the control and prevention of malaria transmission. The strategic plans involve a combination of clinical treatment of the disease with vector surveillance and control, most often using insecticides [5, 6]. However, resistance to these chemical interventions is now widespread in vector populations, and in particular the anopheline species, which transmit the malaria parasite [6]. For example, a numbers of studies (e.g. [3, 4, 6, 7]) have reported IR to the commonly used insecticide classes (pyrethroids, carbamates, organophosphates and organochlorine) in most African countries. Typically, resistant mosquitoes survive the exposure to standard doses of the insecticides used in indoor residual house spraying (IRS) and long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs), hence threatening the success of the fight against malaria transmission [8, 9]. There are four major underlying mechanisms of IR that have been widely documented, namely, target-site mutation, metabolic, behavioural and cuticular (penetration) resistance [10,11,12].

Target-site resistance is caused by mutations at the site of action of an insecticide, thereby reducing or preventing the insecticide binding affinity [3, 6, 13, 14]. Conversely, metabolic resistance entails increased detoxification of insecticides by the vector through overexpression or conformational changes of the enzymes that can metabolize, sequester and excrete the insecticide [4, 15]. Behavioural resistance involves any modification in the insect’s behaviour that helps it to avoid exposure to insecticides. In malaria vectors, this is commonly observed as a change in biting patterns, for example, biting earlier and outdoors, thus avoiding any LLINs or IRS [4, 16]. Cuticular resistance is seen when the insect’s cuticle thickens, reducing uptake of insecticide by limiting or preventing the absorption or penetration of insecticide [3, 4].

Monitoring IR within malaria vector populations requires comprehensive surveillance to determine where it is emerging, to what degree and how it is spreading in space and time [11]. Extensive, albeit spatially restricted, studies have been carried out to establish the emergence and dissemination of IR in contemporary African malaria vector populations and its impact on the efficacy of control strategies adopted [17, 18]. However, given the impracticality of establishing this critically needed information at every location, there is a growing reliance on modelling to make predictions in situations in which data are absent or limited. In addition, several countries have established longitudinal monitoring in sentinel sites, enabling detection of temporal changes in the prevalence of resistance [19]. With increasing need to establish the trend of IR, Hancock et al. [11] point out the increasing necessity of analysing the spatial–temporal variation of IR across multiple countries.

It is therefore imperative to conduct a review of the modelling techniques employed thus far, explore avenues to bolster models’ robustness and address the challenges encountered. Additionally, attaining a comprehensive grasp of the drivers that contribute to the dissemination of IR among malaria vectors across spatial and temporal dimensions is of paramount importance. This understanding is critical, as IR driving factors significantly contribute to the establishment of a robust foundation for the resultant model [11]. Anchored on the inception and propagation of IR, it is imperative to consider the role played by ecological processes and principles. These elements serve as orchestrators of crucial cellular processes, physiological activities, insect movements and the intricate mechanisms governing metabolic detoxification [20, 21]. The balance between heat utilization and storage by the insects based on internal and external environmental conditions, such as temperature, is a potential influencer of insects’ responses to stressors [22]. Consequentially, the heightened production of enzymes to detoxify insecticides leads to depletion of heat reserves in mosquitoes [23].

Given the interrelation of heat and temperature with IR among malaria vectors, ecological principles such as thermodynamics assume a potentially crucial role in modelling IR. Specifically, the second principle of thermodynamics, which posits that processes involving the transfer or conversion of energy are inherently irreversible and tend to result in increased disorder (entropy), becomes particularly relevant. It is important to note that entropy in the universe is perpetually non-negative, a fundamental concept that could hold valuable insights for understanding and modelling IR dynamics [24]. Moreover, the migration of resistant vectors to new areas holds the potential to significantly contribute to the propagation of IR [25]. Such dissemination signifies an irreversible flow, consequently leading to an escalation in entropy. Although literature hints at a conceivable connection between thermodynamic principles and the occurrence/spread of IR, it remains unclear whether such considerations are factored into existing models.

Hence, this paper presents a review of the existing studies aimed at establishing the distribution patterns of IR within field vector populations. This review explored the modelling methodologies employed to elucidate the spatial and temporal occurrence and propagation of IR in field vector populations. Specifically, we addressed the following research inquiries:

  1. 1.

    Which modelling techniques are commonly employed to elucidate the spatial, temporal and spatio-temporal trends of IR in malaria vectors?

  2. 2.

    Which IR driving factors are utilized as inputs to inform the development of spatial, temporal and spatio-temporal models?

  3. 3.

    What are the limitations encountered in utilizing IR spatial, temporal and spatio-temporal modelling techniques?

  4. 4.

    To what extent have ecological principles, including thermodynamics, been incorporated into the study of insects and their development of IR?

Through these insights, we anticipate that future advancements and refinements in modelling techniques can be achieved, thus contributing to the overall enhancement of our comprehension of IR distribution and dynamics.

Methods

Literature search, inclusion and exclusion criteria

To select the articles for review, we followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) procedures, which delineate different phases of a systematic review that includes identification, screening, eligibility and inclusion criteria [26]. We conducted literature search in three databases, that is, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science, with the search based on various themes, namely: (a) insecticide resistance, (b) malaria vectors, (c) modelling and (d) ecological principle in IR diffusion and thermodynamics. For each theme, we employed specific keywords, including “insecticide resistance”, “malaria”, “vector*”, “model”, “thermodynamics*”, “ecological principle” and “diffusion”. Combining these keywords, we customized our search strategy for each database to maximize specificity. We did not impose restrictions on the initial publication year of the articles, with our search extending until March 2023. Table 1 presents a summary of the keywords used.

Table 1 Keywords used in database searches in systematic review
Full size table

Eligibility criteria

This review was specifically confined to studies that addressed spatial, temporal and spatio-temporal modelling of IR in malaria vector populations, with a particular emphasis on the incorporation of thermodynamics, diffusion and ecological principles into the models. Therefore, the eligibility criteria involved selection of articles that exclusively explored IR in malaria vectors, with a specific focus on spatial and spatio-temporal IR distribution modelling. We excluded articles related to IR tests in malaria vectors and those that employed alternative IR modelling approaches beyond spatial, temporal and spatio-temporal modelling. Additionally, we limited our selection to articles published in English. A detailed eligibility criteria is presented in Table 2.

Table 2 Eligibility criteria
Full size table

Screening and selection of articles

During the search process, the articles were subjected to a three-phase screening procedure in accordance with the PRISMA flow diagram (see Page et al. [26]). The initial phase involved filtering articles on the basis of keywords to identify those relevant to our study. In the second phase, we manually screened the selected articles by reviewing their titles and abstracts, eliminating those that did not meet the eligibility criteria. Subsequently, we consolidated articles from each database and conducted a comprehensive assessment of the full text for each article after removing duplicates.

Risk of bias assessment

We conducted a narrative synthesis of all the articles included in the review and presented the results in a tabular format. To evaluate biases pertinent to our review, we followed the guidelines outlined in the Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) guide [27].

Results

Search results

In the databases chosen for the study (i.e. PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases), we initially retrieved a total of 1994, 1979 and 1968 articles, respectively. After removing duplicate entries and conducting a rigorous screening process, we identified 18 articles that met our criteria for full review. Additionally, we included four (4) articles identified through citation searches for further evaluation. When conducting a combined search using all keywords we obtained zero results, hence we excluded the term ‘thermodynamics’ from the combined search. Subsequently, we conducted a separate search specifically for ‘thermodynamics’, resulting in the retrieval of five articles. Figure 1 illustrates the search results.

Fig. 1
figure 1

PRISMA flow chart of the search phases and the number of records retrieved

Full size image

Summary of the reviewed articles

The summary details of the articles [10,11,12, 28, 29, 33, 45, 52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66]  included in the final review are presented in Additional file 1: Table S1. The articles’ summary includes the aim, the methodology adopted and findings of the studies (Additional file 2).

Risk of bias assessment

Selection bias, encompassing sequence generation and allocation concealment, did not pertain to this systematic review. Furthermore, none of the reviewed articles included blinding of participants or investigators, excluding blinding (performance and detection bias) from the review. Additionally, the risk of bias due to attrition was not applicable to our review. Importantly, reporting risks were consistently low across all 22 studies, as they diligently adhered to the pre-specified methodology in providing detailed and coherent findings.

Equity analysis

Equity analysis showed that the majority (65.97%) of the institutions affiliated with the authors were located in countries that are not hyperendemic. The remaining institutions (34.03%) were situated in hyperendemic countries.

Spatial and spatio-temporal modelling of insecticide resistance in mosquito vectors

The reviewed articles used different mapping and modelling techniques to elucidate IR trends in malaria vectors. These approaches encompassed mapping occurrence of IR with techniques such as geographic information system (GIS), Bayesian geostatistical models, generalized linear models (GLMs) and generalized additive models (GAMs). Species distributions models were used to map vectors’ distribution but not IR in vectors’ population. Notably, none of the studies employed dynamic models to investigate the spatio-temporal distribution of IR in malaria vectors across both space and time. In addition, several modelling approaches involved splitting the data into training and test sets. This process involves training the model with the training sets and subsequently evaluating its performance using the test set. Figure 2 provides a summary of the modelling techniques employed.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Models used to determine IR trends and distribution of malaria vectors. GIS implies geographic information system (GIS)

Full size image

Drivers for the models on spatial and spatial–temporal trends of insecticide resistance

The studies employed various factors as drivers for informing the spatial modelling of IR in malaria vectors. These encompassed, among others, climatic, sociological and environmental conditions, as well as the extensive use of insecticides in both agricultural and public health sectors. Some of the reviewed articles also incorporated lagged temporal variables, positing their influence on IR patterns. Nevertheless, other studies chose not to lag temporal variables, suggesting that such lagged variables might not significantly impact IR distribution within the model. Biological variables were also considered in some studies. Notably, very few studies explored the potential influence of vector dispersal and thermodynamics on the spread of IR across space and time. Table 3 provides a summary of the diverse drivers employed in these analyses.

Table 3 Summary of potential driver of insecticide resistance in malaria vector populations
Full size table

Challenges encountered in modelling insecticide resistance among vectors

The reviewed articles underscore multiple challenges encountered in modelling IR among the vectors. These challenges encompass a spectrum of issues, which include the scarcity of observations in field populations in certain regions and the lack of data on potential drivers. A summary of these challenges is provided in Table 4.

Table 4 Challenges faced in modelling insecticide resistance in space and time
Full size table

Thermodynamics

Following our review, no study investigated the role of thermodynamics on IR diffusion over space and time. However, a few studies discussed thermodynamics in the context of insects, as presented Table 5.

Table 5 Thermodynamics and insects activities
Full size table

Discussion

This review shows that diverse ranges of field studies have focussed on confirming the existence of IR in malaria vector populations within specific regions. Furthermore, numerous studies have delved into susceptibility tests and few on modelling and mapping of the spatial distribution of IR among malaria vectors. The growing emphasis on mapping and modelling the spatial distribution of IR in malaria vector populations can be attributed to the escalating demand for effective malaria control strategies and the management of IR in these vectors [6]. The studies under review have employed various methodologies for modelling and mapping IR distribution. These approaches encompass Bayesian geostatistical models, generalized linear models (GLMs) which generally extends the traditional linear regression model [67], generalized additive models (GAMs) which are extensions of GLMs [68], and geographic information systems (GIS). The outputs generated by these models hold considerable significance in shaping strategies for IR management and control [11, 28, 29].

Nevertheless, the resulting models are often static, meaning that once these studies formulate the models, they tend to use them without subsequent updates. Furthermore, there is a noticeable underutilization of dynamic modelling approaches in modelling IR distribution. Dynamic modelling approaches offer the advantage of adaptability, allowing the model to be continuously updated as new data become available. This is particularly valuable when modelling phenomena are characterized by temporal dynamics. Regardless of the specific mechanisms involved, whether they are target-site mutations, metabolic modifications, behavioural adaptations or changes in the mosquito cuticle, they all contribute to the development of IR in mosquito populations. This result underscores the potential of dynamic modelling as a holistic approach to grasp the evolution of IR. Yet our review of the literature indicates a significant lack of dynamic modelling applications in studies on vectors, despite their proven efficacy in predicting the spread of certain insects, such as Tuta absoluta, with notable accuracy [30].

Additionally, a notable observation is that various models featured in the reviewed articles primarily focus on spatial aspects of IR distribution within vectors at discrete timepoints, often neglecting temporal trends. Many studies employ data-driven modelling approaches; hence, the robustness of these models is heavily contingent on the quality and quantity of the data utilized. Nonetheless, a significant challenge encountered in the development of models for IR distribution is the scarcity of data, particularly in regions where the status of IR distribution remains unknown. In this context, a comprehensive comprehension of spatial variations, temporal patterns and future analyses necessitates robust data coverage across both spatial and temporal dimensions, ideally including standardized measures of IR [31]. The idea presented in Hancock et al. [11] that tackles the challenge of data scarcity involves creating models informed by available data, thereby facilitating predictions in regions with insufficient IR data.

The IR datasets utilized in the reviewed studies were derived from a mix of sources, including primary data collection and secondary data from existing databases, such as the vector atlas database (https://vectoratlas.icipe.org/) [32]. These databases, vital for providing essential IR data, compile their contents from a range of sources, including published reports, peer-reviewed scientific journals, governmental and non-governmental organizations and research institutions. Such data play a crucial role in supporting efforts to combat malaria. Nonetheless, collecting these data are challenging. Furthermore, inconsistencies in data reporting and a lack of standardized methodologies present significant obstacles to utilizing these data effectively. Additional limitations include the absence of bioassay studies or surveillance in various locations and the reluctance or failure of data holders to share their findings, leading to gaps in data availability. This scarcity of data, coupled with the challenges of data collection and standardization, hampers the comprehensive understanding and management of IR.

In exploring alternative strategies in situations of limited data availability, one promising avenue is the utilization of mechanistic modelling approaches. These approaches hold considerable potential as they do not heavily rely on extensive data inputs compared with data-driven models. Mechanistic models are premised on an understanding of the underlying biological, ecological or physical processes driving the phenomenon of interest. Mechanistic models often involve the development of mathematical equations or simulations that capture the fundamental mechanisms governing the system. These models can provide valuable insights into the dynamics of IR, even when there are a scarcity of empirical data. By incorporating knowledge about the biology, behaviour and genetics of the vector species, as well as the mechanisms of insecticide action, mechanistic models can help simulate and predict how IR may evolve and spread over time. While data-driven models rely heavily on available observations, mechanistic models offer an advantage in situations in which empirical data are limited or unavailable. They allow researchers to make informed predictions on the basis of a fundamental understanding of the underlying processes. However, it is important to note that mechanistic models require a strong theoretical foundation and a thorough grasp of the relevant biological and ecological factors, making them a valuable tool in addressing data scarcity challenges in IR modelling.

The drivers used to inform IR models have an implication on the robustness of the resulting models [11]. Commonly used drivers of IR include climatic, environmental, topographic and biological factors [11, 28, 33, 34]. In addition, the spatial distribution of malaria vectors is highly influenced by human population density, irrigated natural/crop landscapes, areas with water pools and dense scrublands [35]. The vector occurrence and abundance also vary considerably in space and time, depending on seasonal conditions, presence of interventions, and smaller scale heterogeneity such as proximity to productive larval sites. The reviewed articles note that the list of drivers may not be exhaustive, and therefore inclusion of additional drivers can potentially result in a more robust model [11]. Hence, this indicates the need to explore additional potential drivers of IR in malaria vector populations. In addition, the trend shows use of a large number of variables to inform IR models. This increases possibilities of collinearity among the variables.

In modelling, the process of model validation is crucial for ensuring the accuracy, reliability and trustworthiness of the outputs [36]. Model validation also serves to determine whether a model is overfitting; that is, it performs well on the training data but fails to generalize effectively to unseen data. In the studies reviewed, the use of a test set (unseen data) is a common practice for model validation. This approach involves setting aside a portion of the data as a test set to evaluate the model’s performance after it has been trained on the training set. Additionally, other model validation techniques, such as cross-validation [11], are utilized. Cross-validation is a resampling technique used to evaluate a model’s performance on a limited data sample [37]. This method involves dividing the data sample into a specified number of partitions, denoted by the parameter k, to systematically validate the model across different subsets of the data. On the basis of the findings of this review, it is evident that the existing models for IR in vector populations are yet to incorporate the principles of thermodynamics and diffusion principles. Nevertheless, theoretical advancements have recognized that the physiological processes of malaria vectors and other ectothermic organisms, including the metabolism of insecticides, are profoundly influenced by temperature and environmental conditions. Moreover, temperature fluctuations play a significant role in determining the efficacy of insecticides. Specifically, elevated temperatures tend to reduce the effectiveness of insecticides, as they accelerate the rate of metabolism and alter the underlying biochemical processes [33, 38, 39].

Energy plays a crucial role in various physiological processes within an insect, encompassing movement, respiration, immunity and metabolism [40]. Insecticides exert their effects by disrupting the energy balance within the vectors’ nervous systems, ultimately leading to their paralysis and demise. In response, insecticide-resistant insects employ various mechanisms, such as enhanced detoxification of the insecticide or mutations in the target site, which reduce the binding affinity for the insecticide. These mechanisms involve energy-intensive processes, demanding the insect to expend more energy. This highlights the relevance of thermodynamic principles in the context of understanding the spread of IR over time and space. Another thermodynamic concept pertinent to IR is entropy. As the prevalence of resistance alleles in populations increases, entropy also rises [41]. Strikingly, among the reviewed articles, none have incorporated thermodynamic principles into the modelling of spatial IR distribution. This underscores the potential for further exploration in this area, as the integration of thermodynamics could yield valuable insights into the dynamics of IR within vector populations. Various mathematical expressions and probability distributions play a crucial role in estimating principles, including those related to thermodynamics. The Boltzmann distribution, for instance, is utilized in calculating entropy [42]. This distribution can also be applied to quantify thermodynamic properties, thereby allowing for their integration as a covariate in insecticide resistance (IR) models. The integration of thermodynamics into modelling has been demonstrated in other contexts, notably in describing the relationship between insect development and temperature [38, 42,43,44]. Incorporating thermodynamic principles into IR models could enhance our understanding of the randomness and disorder inherent in the evolution of resistance, potentially leading to more accurate predictions and insights into resistance mechanisms.

Furthermore, it is noteworthy that a significant gap exists in the consideration of migration or dispersal as potential drivers influencing the spatial distribution of IR in vectors over both space and time. The role of migration and dispersal should not be dismissed in this context, as the movement of adult mosquitoes has the capacity to significantly transform their spatial and temporal distribution. Migratory or dispersal events can introduce genetic diversity, including resistance alleles into previously unaffected regions, impacting the local dynamics of IR. Understanding the extent and patterns of vector migration and dispersal is crucial, as these factors can influence the spread of resistance, particularly in areas with varying selective pressures. However, it is important to recognize that the incorporation of migration and dispersal into models for IR distribution is a complex endeavour, requiring data and a nuanced understanding of vector behaviour and movement patterns. Therefore, this aspect represents a gap for further exploration and integration into future research efforts aimed at comprehensively modelling IR in vector populations [41,42,43,44,45]. Vectors have also been observed to disperse for various reasons, including searching for food, mates and oviposition and resting sites. These dispersal behaviours exert a notable influence on their spatial distribution [45, 46].

Another critical issue that is often overlooked when developing models to explain the combined spatial and temporal evolution of IR is the initial conditions in both time and space. In the context of modelling, ‘initial conditions’ refer to the starting values or states of the system under study. These conditions serve as the foundation upon which the model begins to simulate the dynamic processes over time and across space. The importance of accurate initial conditions cannot be understated. They significantly influence the trajectory and outcomes predicted by the model. Without proper initial conditions, the model may not faithfully represent the real-world scenario, potentially leading to inaccurate or unreliable predictions. For example, when modelling IR dynamics in a specific region, it is crucial to know the initial prevalence and distribution of resistance alleles among the vector population at the beginning of the study period. Likewise, the starting environmental conditions and selective pressures are equally vital. Failure to account for these initial conditions can result in models that lack realism and predictive power. Therefore, an essential aspect of modelling the spatio-temporal evolution of IR lies in obtaining accurate and representative initial conditions, which often requires collecting baseline data and incorporating them into the modelling process. By doing so, models can better capture the actual dynamics of IR as it unfolds over time and space, leading to more reliable and insightful predictions.

Conclusions

The reviewed studies have primarily focused on “mapping” the spatial trends of IR in malaria vectors to gain insights into the spatial and temporal distribution of IR within these vectors. A prevalent observation is the predominant use of static models for spatial IR modelling, with limited exploration of dynamic modelling approaches. Dynamic modelling approaches hold significant potential, particularly for capturing the temporal dynamics associated with the evolution of IR over time, as vectors adapt to the selective pressures exerted by insecticides. Additionally, we conclude that there is untapped potential to enhance the robustness of models employed for spatial and temporal IR modelling by incorporating additional IR drivers. Furthermore, a notable omission in the reviewed articles is the integration of thermodynamic and diffusion principles into the modelling framework. This remains an unexplored area that holds promise for further investigation. In essence, these conclusions underscore the need for continued research and innovation in the field of spatial and temporal modelling of IR in malaria vectors. A more comprehensive and dynamic modelling approach, coupled with the inclusion of additional drivers and the exploration of thermodynamic principles, can contribute to a deeper understanding of IR dynamics and lead to more effective strategies for its management and control. The practical outcomes of our review underscore the essential function of modelling in pinpointing locations affected by IR, mapping its proliferation and deciphering its evolution over time. The insights garnered from these models are pivotal in creating a solid base for devising effective intervention strategies and formulating recommendations that guide decision-making. Therefore, the intelligence acquired from modelling efforts plays a critical role in shaping actionable recommendations, significantly influencing the strategies employed in malaria vector control. This underscores the value of modelling not just as a theoretical exercise, but also as a practical tool with direct implications for public health and policy formulation.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. WHO. Malaria. 2022. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/malaria

  2. Organization WH. World malaria report 2023. 2023. https://www.who.int/teams/global-malaria-programme/reports/world-malaria-report-2023

  3. WHO. World malaria report 2020. Geneva; 2020. https://www.who.int/teams/global-malaria-programme/reports/world-malaria-report-2020

  4. WHO. Global report on insecticide resistance in malaria vectors: 2010–2016. Geneva. 2018. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/272533/9789241514057-eng.pdf

  5. Coetzee M, Coosemans M, Curtis C, Das PK, De Savigny D, Dolo G, Githure J, Hassan AN, Hawley W, Rubio-Palis Y, Vythilingam I, Brantly EP, Hesse G, Mukelabai K, Sundén-Bylehn A, Yamagata Y, Hill J, Marchand RP, José N, White GB, Cham MK, Guillet P,Nafo-Traoré F, Schapira A, Toure YT. Malaria vector control and personal protection. World Heal Organ–Tech Rep Ser. 2005.

  6. WHO. Word Malaria Report 2021. Word Malar. Rep. Geneva World Heal. Organ. (2021). Licence CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Geneva; 2021. https://www.who.int/teams/global-malaria-programme/reports/world-malaria-report-2021

  7. WHO. Global plan for insecticide resistance management in malaria vectors. Geneva; 2012. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-HTM-GMP-2012.5

  8. Riveron JM, Tchouakui M, Mugenzi L, Menze BD, Chiang M-C, Wondji CS. Insecticide resistance in malaria vectors: an update at a global scale. Towar Malar Elimin A Leap Forw. 2018.

  9. Oladipo HJ, Tajudeen YA, Oladunjoye IO, Yusuff SI, Yusuf RO, Oluwaseyi EM, AbdulBasit MO, Adebisi YA, El-Sherbini MS. Increasing challenges of malaria control in sub-Saharan Africa: priorities for public health research and policymakers. Ann Med Surg. 2022;81:104366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hancock PA, Wiebe A, Gleave KA, Bhatt S, Cameron E, Trett A, Weetman D, Smith DL, Hemingway J, Coleman M, Gething PW, Moyes CL. Associated patterns of insecticide resistance in field populations of malaria vectors across Africa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:5938–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Hancock PA, Hendriks CJM, Tangena J-A, Gibson H, Hemingway J, Coleman M, Gething PW, Cameron E, Bhatt S, Moyes CL. Mapping trends in insecticide resistance phenotypes in African malaria vectors. PLoS Biol. 2020;18:e3000633.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Moyes CL, Athinya DK, Seethaler T, Battle KE, Sinka M, Hadi MP, Hemingway J, Coleman M, Hancock PA. Evaluating insecticide resistance across African districts to aid malaria control decisions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117:22042–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Hemingway J, Ranson H. Insecticide resistance in insect vectors of human disease. Annu Rev Entomol. 2000;45:371–91. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.371.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Suh PF, Elanga-Ndille E, Tchouakui M, Sandeu MM, Tagne D, Wondji C, Ndo C. Impact of insecticide resistance on malaria vector competence: a literature review. Malar J. 2023;22:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04444-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu N. Insecticide resistance in mosquitoes: impact, mechanisms, and research directions. Annu Rev Entomol. 2015;60:537–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sparks TC, Lockwood JA, Byford RL, Graves JB, Leonard BR. The role of behavior in insecticide resistance. Pestic Sci. 1989;26:383–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. WHO. World malaria report 2018. Geneva; 2018.

  18. Pfeffer DA, Lucas TC, May D, Harris J, Rozier J, Twohig KA, Dalrymple U, Guerra CA, Moyes CL, Thorn M, Nguyen M, Bhatt S, Cameron E, Weiss DJ, Howes RE, Battle KE, Gibson HS & Gething PW. malariaAtlas: an R interface to global malariometric data hosted by the Malaria Atlas Project. Malar J. 2018;17:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ranson H, Lissenden N. Insecticide resistance in African anopheles mosquitoes: a worsening situation that needs urgent action to maintain malaria control. Trends Parasitol. 2016;32:187–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2015.11.010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Silva AX, Jander G, Samaniego H, Ramsey JS, Figueroa CC. Insecticide resistance mechanisms in the green peach aphid Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae) I: a transcriptomic survey. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wu M-Y, Ying Y-Y, Zhang S-S, Li X-G, Yan W-H, Yao Y-C, Shah S, Wu G, Yang F. Effects of Diallyl Trisulfide, an active substance from garlic essential oil, on energy metabolism in male moth Sitotroga cerealella (Olivier). Insects. 2020;11:270.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Pörtner HO, Bock C, Mark FC. Oxygen- & capacity-limited thermal tolerance: bridging ecology & physiology. J Exp Biol. 2017;220:2685–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Felipe D, Diniz A, De M-S, Maria E, Santos DM, Beserra EB, Helvecio E, Carvalho-Leandro D, Santos BS, Lima VLM, Ayres CFJ. Fitness cost in field and laboratory Aedes aegypti populations associated with resistance to the insecticide temephos. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-1276-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Surya SP. The Second Law of Thermodynamics. 2020.

  25. Endersby-Harshman NM, Schmidt TL, Chung J, van Rooyen A, Weeks AR, Hoffmann AA. Molecular ecology-2020-endersby-harshman-heterogeneous genetic invasions of three insecticide resistance mutations in. pdf. Mol Ecol. 2020;29:1628–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J. Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D. Statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2020;2021:372.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hooijmans CR, Rovers MM, De Vries RBM, Leenaars M, Ritskes-Hoitinga M, Langendam MW. SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Souris M, Marcombe S, Laforet J, Brey PT, Corbel V, Overgaard HJ. Modeling spatial variation in risk of presence and insecticide resistance for malaria vectors in Laos. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0177274.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Hancock PA, Lynd A, Wiebe A, Devine M, Essandoh J, Wat’senga F, Manzambi EZ, Agossa F, Donnelly MJ, Weetman D, Moyes CL. Modelling spatiotemporal trends in the frequency of genetic mutations conferring insecticide target-site resistance in African mosquito malaria vector species. BMC Biol. 2022;20:46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Guimapi RYA, Mohamed SA, Okeyo GO, Ndjomatchoua FT, Ekesi S, Tonnang HEZ. Modeling the risk of invasion and spread of Tuta absoluta in Africa. Ecol Complex. 2016;28:77–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2016.08.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Moyes CL, Vontas J, Martins AJ, Ng LC, Koou SY, Dusfour I, Raghavendra K, Pinto J, Corbel V, David JP, Weetman D. Contemporary status of insecticide resistance in the major Aedes vectors of arboviruses infecting humans. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11:e0005625.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Moyes CL, Wiebe A, Gleave K, Trett A, Hancock PA, Padonou GG, Chouaïbou MS, Sovi A, Abuelmaali SA, Ochomo E, Antonio-Nkondjio C, Dengela D, Kawada H, Dabire RK, Donnelly MJ, Mbogo C, Fornadel C, Coleman M. Analysis-ready datasets for insecticide resistance phenotype and genotype frequency in African malaria vectors. Sci data. 2019;6:121.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Glunt KD, Paaijmans KP, Read AF, Thomas MB. Environmental temperatures significantly change the impact of insecticides measured using WHOPES protocols. Malar J. 2014;13:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bellone R, Failloux AB. The role of temperature in shaping mosquito-borne viruses transmission. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Moffett A, Shackelford N, Sarkar S. Malaria in Africa: vector species’ niche models and relative risk maps. PLoS ONE. 2007;2:e824.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Kleijnen JPC. Validation of models. 1999; 647–54.

  37. Browne MW. Cross-validation methods. J Math Psychol. 2000;44:108–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Oliver SV, Brooke BD. The effect of elevated temperatures on the life history and insecticide resistance phenotype of the major malaria vector Anopheles arabiensis (Diptera: Culicidae). Malar J. 2017;16:73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Glunt KD, Oliver SV, Hunt RH, Paaijmans KP. The impact of temperature on insecticide toxicity against the malaria vectors Anopheles arabiensis and Anopheles funestus. Malar J. 2018;17:131.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. González-Tokman D, Córdoba-Aguilar A, Dáttilo W, Lira-Noriega A, Sánchez-Guillén RA, Villalobos F. Insect responses to heat: physiological mechanisms, evolution and ecological implications in a warming world. Biol Rev. 2020;95:802–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Hua MAW, Wu T, Zhang Z, Li H, Mingsitu G, Linyin C, E X, CHEN M, ZHAO X, HE K, LI F. Using transcriptome Shannon entropy to evaluate the off-target effects and safety of insecticidal siRNAs. J Integr Agric. 2022;21:170–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63394-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Stupski SD. Insect thermodynamics. 2020.

  43. Ikemoto T, Kurahashi I. Three epochs on estimating the parameter values of thermodynamic Sharpe-Schoolfield-Ikemoto (SSI) model describing the relation of temperature and insect development rate. Environ Entomol. 2023;52:957–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Corkrey R, McMeekin TA, Bowman JP, Ratkowsky DA, Olley J, Ross T. Protein thermodynamics can be predicted directly from biological growth rates. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e96100.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Alegana VA, Kigozi SP, Nankabirwa J, Arinaitwe E, Kigozi R, Mawejje H, Kilama M, Ruktanonchai NW, Ruktanonchai CW, Drakeley C, Lindsay SW, Greenhouse B, Kamya MR, Smith DL, Atkinson PM, Dorsey G, Tatem AJ. Spatio-temporal analysis of malaria vector density from baseline through intervention in a high transmission setting. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9:637.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Midega JT, Mbogo CM, Mwnambi H, Wilson MD, Ojwang G, Mwangangi JM, Nzovu JG, Githure JI, Yan G, Beier JC. Estimating dispersal and survival of Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles funestus along the Kenyan coast by using mark-release-recapture methods. J Med Entomol. 2007;44:923–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Frazier MR, Huey RB, Berrigan D. Thermodynamics constrains the evolution of insect population growth rates: “warmer is better.” Am Nat. 2006;168:512–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. van der Have TM. Slaves to the Eyring equation? Temperature dependence of life-history characters in developing ectotherms. 2008.

  49. Lazzari CR. The thermal sense of blood-sucking insects: why physics matters. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2019;34:112–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Stupski SD. Insect thermodynamics. The Pennsylvania State University; 2020.

  51. Reynolds AM. Understanding the thermodynamic properties of insect swarms. Sci Rep. 2021;11:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94582-x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Sogoba N, Vounatsou P, Bagayoko MM, Doumbia S, Dolo G, Gosoniu L, Gosoniu L, Traoré SF, Smith TA, Touré YT. The spatial distribution of Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto and An. arabiensis (Diptera: Culicidae) in Mali. Geospat Health. 2007;1:213–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Mathias DK, Ochomo E, Atieli F, Ombok M, Bayoh MN, Olang G, Muhia D, Kamau L, Vulule JM, Hamel MJ, Hawley WA, Walker ED, Gimnig JE. Spatial and temporal variation in the kdr allele L1014S in Anopheles gambiae s.s. and phenotypic variability in susceptibility to insecticides in Western Kenya. Malar J. 2011;10:10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Knox TB, Juma EO, Ochomo EO, Pates Jamet H, Ndungo L, Chege P, Muhia D, Kamau L, Vulule JM, Hamel MJ, Hawley WA, Walker ED, Gimnig JE. An online tool for mapping insecticide resistance in major Anopheles vectors of human malaria parasites and review of resistance status for the Afrotropical region. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Edi CAV, Koudou BG, Bellai L, Adja AM, Chouaibou M, Bonfoh B, Barry SJE, Johnson PCD, Müller P, Dongus S, N’Goran EK, Ranson H, Weetman D. Long-term trends in Anopheles gambiae insecticide resistance in Côte d’Ivoire. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:500.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Acheson ES, Plowright AA, Kerr JT. Where have all the mosquito nets gone? Spatial modelling reveals mosquito net distributions across Tanzania do not target optimal Anopheles mosquito habitats. Malar J. 2015;14:322.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Wei X, Yan G, Zhou G, Zhong D, Fang Q, Yang X, Hu D, Chang X. A neural network prediction of environmental determinants of Anopheles sinensis knockdown resistance mutation to pyrethroids in China. J Vector Ecol. 2016;41:295–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Abeku TA, Helinski MEH, Kirby MJ, Ssekitooleko J, Bass C, Kyomuhangi I, Okia M, Magumba G, Meek SR. Insecticide resistance patterns in Uganda and the effect of indoor residual spraying with bendiocarb on kdr L1014S frequencies in Anopheles gambiae s.s. Malar J. 2017;16:156.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Epopa PS, Millogo AA, Collins CM, North A, Tripet F, Benedict MQ, Diabate A. The use of sequential mark-release-recapture experiments to estimate population size, survival and dispersal of male mosquitoes of the Anopheles gambiae complex in Bana, a West African humid savannah village. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10:376.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Wiebe A, Longbottom J, Gleave K, Shearer FM, Sinka ME, Massey NC, Cameron E, Bhatt S, Gething PW, Hemingway J, Smith DL, Coleman M, Moyes CL. Geographical distributions of African malaria vector sibling species and evidence for insecticide resistance. Malar J. 2017;16:85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Wairimu J, Chirove F, Ronoh M, Malonza DM. Modeling the effects of insecticides resistance on malaria vector control in endemic regions of Kenya. Biosystems. 2018;174:49–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Cook J, Tomlinson S, Kleinschmidt I, Donnelly MJ. Implications of insecticide resistance for malaria vector control with long-lasting insecticidal nets: trends in pyrethroid resistance during a WHO-coordinated multi-country prospective study. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Mundis SJ, Estep AS, Waits CM, Ryan SJ. Spatial variation in the frequency of knockdown resistance genotypes in Florida Aedes aegypti populations. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13:1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Zhou G, Yu L, Wang X, Zhong D, Lee MC, Kibret S, Yan G. Behavioral response of insecticide-resistant mosquitoes against spatial repellent: a modified self-propelled particle model simulation. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244447.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Bisanzio D, Ally M, Ali AS, Kitojo C, Serbantez N, Kisinza WN, Magesa S, Reithinger R. Modelling insecticide resistance of malaria vector populations in Tanzania. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2022;107:308–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Das S, Máquina M, Phillips K, Cuamba N, Marrenjo D, Saúte F, Paaijmans KP, Huijben S. Fine-scale spatial distribution of deltamethrin resistance and population structure of Anopheles funestus and Anopheles arabiensis populations in Southern Mozambique. Malar J. 2023;22:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04522-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Ali Ibrahim E, Salifu D, Musili Mwalili S, Dubois T, Edouard Zefack Tonnang H. Analysis of overdispersed insect count data from an avocado plantation in thika. Kenya Int J Data Sci Anal. 2022;8:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Maindonald J. Smoothing Terms in GAM Models. 2010; 1–15.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Vector Atlas team for their insights.

Funding

The present study was executed by the International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology as part of the Vector Atlas project, made possible by the generous support of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-021972). Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the donor.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (Icipe), PO box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya

    Eric Ali Ibrahim, Mark Wamalwa & Henri Edouard Zefack Tonnang

  2. School of Agricultural, Earth, and Environmental Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, 3209, South Africa

    Eric Ali Ibrahim, John Odindi & Henri Edouard Zefack Tonnang

Authors
  1. Eric Ali Ibrahim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mark Wamalwa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. John Odindi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Henri Edouard Zefack Tonnang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

EAI, MW, JO, and HEZT were responsible for conceptualization; EAI for original draft preparation; and EAI, MW, JO, and HEZT for writing and review. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henri Edouard Zefack Tonnang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare there is no conflict of interest in this published article.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Summary of articles included in final systematic review follow the screening process.

Additional file 2.

Summary on approaches used to model and map insecticide resistance.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ibrahim, E.A., Wamalwa, M., Odindi, J. et al. Insights and challenges of insecticide resistance modelling in malaria vectors: a review. Parasites Vectors 17, 174 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-024-06237-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-024-06237-1

Keywords

Parasites & Vectors

ISSN: 1756-3305

Contact us