Table 4 The prevalence and distribution of N. mikurensis in questing I. ricinus in the Netherlands and Belgium
From: Prevalence of Neoehrlichia mikurensis in ticks and rodents from North-west Europe
Location | Tested (n) | Positive (n) | Prevalence (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
Boswachterij Hardenberg | 90 | 7 | 8% (3-15%) |
Dintelse Gorzen | 122 | 9 | 7% (3-14%) |
Drents-Friese Wold | 29 | 1 | 3% (0-18%) |
Duin en Kruidberg (2009) | 320 | 52 | 16% (12-21%) |
Duin en Kruidberg (2010) | 137 | 11 | 8% (4-14%) |
Hoog Soeren | 217 | 3 | 1% (0-4%) |
Kop van Schouwen | 238 | 23 | 10% (6-14%) |
Denekamp | 104 | 4 | 4% (1-10%) |
Pyramide van Austerlitz | 270 | 32 | 12% (8-16%) |
Rijk van Nijmegen | 53 | 1 | 2% (0-10%) |
Ulvenhoutse bos | 8 | 1 | 13% (0-53%) |
Vijlenerbos | 328 | 10 | 3% (2-5%) |
Vrouwenpolder | 86 | 6 | 7% (3-15%) |
Brussel-area, (Sonian forest), (Belgium) | 153 | 0 | 0% (<2%) |
Vlaanderen-area (Belgium) | 114 | 3 | 3% (1-8%) |
Wallonië-area (Belgium) | 106 | 3 | 3% (1-8%) |
Total of all ticks | 2375 | 166 | 7% (6-8%) |
Average of all areas | 15 | 14 | 6% |