Parameter | Description | Estimation | Source |
---|---|---|---|
Dogs | Â | Â | Â |
   D 1jz | Density of dogs of age group j in area z | Data | [20] |
   P 1jz | Prevalence of Toxocara patent infection in dogs of age group j in area z | = p 1jz  × c 1jz | See below |
   p 1jz | Coprological prevalence of Toxocara egg shedding dogs of age group j in area z | ~Beta (a 1jz  + 1, b 1jz  + 1), where: a 1,1,1 = 2, b 1,1,1 = 47; a 1,2,1 = 5, b 1,2,1 = 129; a 1,1,2 = 10, b 1,1,2 = 122; a 1,2,2 = 12, b 1,2,2 = 389; a 1,1,3 = 6, b 1,1,3 = 43; a 1,2,3 = 7, b 1,2,3 = 137 | [9] |
   c 1jz | Proportion of dogs of age group j in area z that do not display a coprophagic behaviour | ~Beta (a 1jz  + 1, b 1jz  + 1), where: a 1,1,1 = 26, b 1,1,1 = 22; a 1,2,1 = 80, b 1,2,1 = 54; a 1,1,2 = 56, b 1,1,2 = 75; a 1,2,2 = 226, b 1,2,2 = 175; a 1,1,3 = 29, b 1,1,3 = 18; a 1,2,3 = 89, b 1,2,3 = 55 | [9] |
   F 1jz | Average faecal output of a dog of age group j released daily into the environment of area z | = f 1 × s 1jz | See below |
   f 1 | Average faecal output of a dog | ~Pert (21, 254, 1074) | |
   s 1jz | Proportion of dog owners that do not comply to dog waste clean-up policies for dogs of age group j in area z | ~Beta (a 1jz  + 1, b 1jz  + 1), where: a 1,1,1 = 20, b 1,1,1 = 28; a 1,2,1 = 80, b 1,2,1 = 54; a 1,1,2 = 87, b 1,1,2 = 44; a 1,2,2 = 277, b 1,2,2 = 154; a 1,1,3 = 27, b 1,1,3 = 20; a 1,2,3 = 106, b 1,2,3 = 37 | [9] |
   I 1j | Infection intensity (EPG) for dogs of age group j | I 1,1 ~ Poisson (341.2); I 1,2 ~ Poisson (163.7) | [34] |
Household cats | Â | Â | Â |
   D 2jz | Density of household cats of age group j in area z | Data | [20] |
   P 2jz | Prevalence of Toxocara patent infection in household cats of age group j in area z | ~Beta (a 2jz  + 1, b 2jz  + 1), where: a 2,1,1 = 0, b 2,1,1 = 2; a 2,2,1 = 0, b 2,2,1 = 18; a 2,1,2 = 2, b 2,1,2 = 15; a 2,2,2 = 8, b 2,2,2 = 52; a 2,1,3 = 2, b 2,1,3 = 1; a 2,2,3 = 5, b 2,2,3 = 12 | [Nijsse, unpublished data] |
   F 2jz | Average faecal output of a household cat of age group j released daily into the environment of area z | = f 2 × o 2jz | See below |
   f 2 | Average faecal output of a household cat | ~Pert (10.2, 19.4, 52.4) | |
   o 2jz | Proportion of household cats of group j in area z with outdoor access | ~Beta (a 2jz  + 1, b 2jz  + 1), where: a 2,1,1 = 1, b 2,1,1 = 1; a 2,2,1 = 5, b 2,2,1 = 13; a 2,1,2 = 3, b 2,1,2 = 13; a 2,2,2 = 45, b 2,2,2 = 13; a 2,1,3 = 2, b 2,1,3 = 1; a 2,2,3 = 14, b 2,2,3 = 3 | [Nijsse, unpublished data] |
   I 2j | Infection intensity (EPG) for household cats of age group j | I 2,1 ~ Poisson (372.8); I 2,2 ~ Poisson (81.7) | [40] |
Stray cats | Â | Â | Â |
   D 3jz | Density of stray cats of age group j in area z | ~Pert (135,000,667,500,1,200,000) × D 2jz  /(∑ j  ∑ i   D 2jz ) | Personal communication: preliminary estimate of feral cat project WUR Wageningen |
   P 3j | Prevalence of Toxocara patent infection in stray cats of age group j | ~Beta (a 3jz  + 1, b 3jz  + 1), where: a 3,1,1 = 16, b 3,1,1 = 12; a 3,2,1 = 17, b 3,2,1 = 8; a 3,1,2 = 16, b 3,1,2 = 12; a 3,2,2 = 17, b 3,2,2 = 8; a 3,1,3 = 16, b 3,1,3 = 12; a 3,2,3 = 17, b 3,2,3 = 8 | [11] |
   F 3 | Average faecal output of a stray cat | ~Pert (10.2, 19.4, 52.4) | |
   I 3j | Infection intensity (EPG) for stray cats of age group j | I 3,1 ~ Poisson (372.8); I 3,2 ~ Poisson (81.7) | [40] |
Foxes | Â | Â | Â |
   D 4jz | Density of foxes of age group j in area z | ~Pert (0.5, 2.25, 4) × d 4jz /(∑ j ∑ i d 4jz ) | [41] |
   d 4jz | Total number of foxes of age group j shot in area z | Data | [41] |
   P 4jz | Prevalence of Toxocara patent infection in foxes of age group j in area z | ~Beta (a 4jz  + 1, b 4jz  + 1), where: a 4,1,1 = 1, b 4,1,1 = 1; a 4,2,1 = 1, b 4,2,1 = 1; a 4,1,2 = 18, b 4,1,2 = 28; a 4,2,2 = 9, b 4,2,2 = 12; a 4,1,3 = 57, b 4,1,3 = 74; a 4,2,3 = 19, b 4,2,3 = 39 | [41] |
   F 4 | Average faecal output of a fox | Log(F 4) ~ Normal (95, 18) | [42] |
   I 4j | Infection intensity (EPG) for foxes of age group j | I 4,1 ~ Poisson (157); I 4,2 ~ Poisson (366) | [12] |