Skip to main content

Table 2 Parameter estimates of tick load in small mammals from negative binomial models. Baseline for species is Sorex araneus. Models for I. ricinus larvae were run excluding and (the best model) including body mass

From: The generalist tick Ixodes ricinus and the specialist tick Ixodes trianguliceps on shrews and rodents in a northern forest ecosystem– a role of body size even among small hosts

 

Estimate

Std. error

z

p

I. ricinus larvae

    

Excluding body mass

    

Intercept

0.4775

0.2314

2.06

0.039

Apodemus flavicollis

0.4029

0.6962

0.58

0.563

Apodemus sylvaticus

1.0826

0.3675

2.95

0.003

Microtus agrestis

−0.0725

0.3853

−0.19

0.851

Myodes glareolus

0.7528

0.3387

2.22

0.026

Sorex minutus

−2.8948

0.4927

−5.88

<0.001

Season (spring vs. fall)

−0.705

0.3618

−1.95

0.051

Including body mass

    

Intercept

−2.6313

0.9461

−2.78

0.005

log (body mass)

1.5014

0.4446

3.38

0.001

Apodemus flavicollis

−1.4505

0.8787

−1.65

0.099

Apodemus sylvaticus

−0.0437

0.4891

−0.09

0.929

Microtus agrestis

−2.0303

0.6912

−2.94

0.003

Myodes glareolus

−0.7295

0.5382

−1.36

0.175

Sorex minutus

−1.4236

0.6455

−2.21

0.027

Season (spring vs. fall)

−0.9547

0.3593

−2.66

0.008

I. ricinus nymphs

    

Intercept

−9.311

1.758

−5.30

<0.001

log (body mass)

2.36

0.616

3.83

<0.001

I. trianguliceps larvae

    

Intercept

0.239

0.16

1.50

0.130

Season (spring vs. fall)

1.404

0.343

4.09

<0.001

I. trianguliceps nymphs

    

Intercept

−7.227

1.959

−3.69

0.000

log (body mass)

1.705

0.876

1.95

0.052

Apodemus flavicollis

−3.841

1.385

−2.77

0.006

Apodemus sylvaticus

−1.140

1.090

−1.05

0.296

Microtus agrestis

−1.778

1.477

−1.20

0.229

Myodes glareolus

−0.647

1.207

−0.54

0.592

Sorex minutus

−20.20

26230.0

0.00

0.999

Location (Forde vs. Angedalen)

1.494

0.636

2.35

0.019