Step | Specific objective | Inputs varied | Output considered |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Comparison of the model-predicted association between Mf and Ag prevalence at community level to observed data from literature | Hypotheses for modelling Ag-prevalence: 1-3 | Model-predicted Mf and Ag prevalence for the population aged 5Â years and above, for each run separately |
Mbr: 1500, 1600, 1700, …4000 | |||
Comparison of the model-predicted post-MDA outcomes to empirical data from Thanjavur district, for the Ag prevalence by age-group | Hypotheses for modelling Ag-prevalence: 1-3 | Model-predicted Mf and Ag prevalence by age-group, averaged over multiple repeated runs | |
Mbr: 1600 | |||
Treatment coverage defined by fitting the model to observed patterns of Mf prevalence | |||
Efficacy of single treatment with DEC (kills Mf: 70Â % and kills adult worm: 50Â %) [87] | |||
Efficacy of single treatment with DEC + ALB (kills Mf: 70 % and kills adult worm: 65 %) [20] | |||
2 | Assess the required duration of MDA for achieving elimination | Hypotheses for modelling Ag-prevalence: not relevant for this part of the work | Proportion of runs that resulted in elimination (elimination was said to occur if the Mf prevalence was zero, 60Â years after the first treatment round) |
Mbr: 1600, 1950, 2200, 2700 | |||
Treatment duration: varied | |||
Treatment coverage: 50Â %, 65Â %, 80Â % | |||
Efficacy of single treatment with DEC + ALB (kills Mf: 70 % and kills adult worm: 65 %) | |||
3 | Assess the 1-year post-treatment values for Mf and Ag prevalence associated with successful control, for the community as a whole and for 6–7 year children. | Hypotheses for modelling Ag-prevalence: hypothesis 2 (identified as best in step 1) | Model-predicted Mf and Ag prevalence for the entire population aged 5 years and above and for 6–7 year-old children, as measured 1 year after the last treatment round |
Mbr: 1600, 1950, 2200, 2700 | |||
Treatment duration: as need to achieve ≥ 99 % probability (estimated in step 2) | |||
Treatment coverage: 50Â %, 65Â %, 80Â % | |||
Efficacy of single treatment with DEC + ALB (kills Mf: 70 % and kills adult worm: 65 %) | |||
4 | Sensitivity analysis | Hypotheses for modelling Ag-prevalence: hypothesis 2 (identified as best in step 1) | Model-predicted Mf and Ag prevalence for the entire population aged 5 years and above and for 6–7 year-old children, as measured 1 year after the last treatment round, or 6 months or 2 years after treatment |
Mbr: 2200 | |||
Treatment duration: as need to achieve ≥ 99 % probability (re-estimated) | |||
Treatment coverage: 65Â % | |||
Efficacy of single treatment with DEC + ALB: varied or as in step 3 |