Author
|
Year
|
Region
|
Period of study
|
Serological method
|
Positivity
|
Detailed information on cats
|
Total no. of cats
|
No. of positive cats (%)
|
Quality score
|
---|
Fu et al. [36]
|
1995
|
Shandong
|
1991–1993
|
IHAa
|
≥ 1:64
|
No
|
200
|
92 (46.00)
|
8
|
Lu et al. [41]
|
1997
|
Shanghai
|
1994–1995
|
IHAb
|
≥ 1:80
|
Gender, age, Season
|
142
|
54 (38.01)
|
10
|
Chen et al. [32]
|
2001
|
Hubei
| |
ELISAf
|
IgG or CAg positive
|
No
|
105
|
33 (31.43)
|
8
|
Zhao et al. [58]
|
2001
|
Shandong
| |
IHAa
|
≥ 1:64
|
No
|
185
|
82 (44.32)
|
7
|
Chen et al. [66]
|
2003
|
Shenzhen, Guangdong
| |
IHAa
|
≥ 1:64
|
No
|
65
|
12 (18.46)
|
6
|
Yuan et al. [54]
|
2004
|
Baoding, Hebei
|
2000–2001
|
ELISAg
|
IgG or CAg positive
|
No
|
75
|
43 (57.33)
|
9
|
Yu et al. [53]
|
2006
|
Beijing
| |
ELISAc
|
IgG positive
|
Gender, age
|
128
|
18 (14.06)
|
9
|
Dubey et al. [35]
|
2007
|
Guangzhou, Guangdong
|
2006
|
MAT
|
≥ 1:40
|
No
|
34
|
27 (79.41)
|
6
|
Yu et al. [51]
|
2008
|
Beijing
|
1999–2005
|
ELISAc
|
IgG positive
|
Gender, age
|
335
|
50 (14.93)
|
9
|
Huang et al. [38]
|
2008
|
Haikou, Hainan
|
2007–2008
|
ELISAd
|
IgG positive
|
No
|
251
|
14 (5.58)
|
8
|
Zhang et al. [56]
|
2009
|
Guangzhou, Guangdong
| |
ELISAd
|
IgG positive
|
Stray or pet, gender, age
|
206
|
52 (25.24)
|
9
|
Sun et al. [46]
|
2009
|
Beijing and neighbor
|
2008
|
ELISAc
|
IgG positive
|
Gender
|
172
|
32 (18.60)
|
8
|
Zhang et al. [64]
|
2009
|
Beijiang, Xinjiang
| |
IHAa
|
≥ 1:64
|
No
|
42
|
3 (7.14)
|
8
|
Lu et al. [40]
|
2010
|
Huhehaote, Inner Monglia
|
2009–2010
|
ELISAe
|
IgG positive
|
Gender
|
87
|
9 (10.34)
|
9
|
Lu et al. [65]
|
2010
|
Lanzhou, Gansu
|
2008–2009
|
Test Paperk
|
antigen positive
|
Age
|
159
|
14 (8.81)
|
8
|
Xie et al. [50]
|
2010
|
Shenzhen, Guangdong
|
2009–2010
|
ELISAd
|
IgG positive
|
No
|
278
|
13 (4.68)
|
9
|
Zhang et al. [55]
|
2010
|
Zhengzhou, Henan
|
2009
|
IHAa
|
≥ 1:64
|
Gender, age
|
58
|
9 (15.52)
|
10
|
Chen et al. [62]
|
2010
|
Shanghai
|
2009–2009
|
IHAa
|
≥ 1:64
|
Stray or pet
|
270
|
65 (24.07)
|
9
|
Qian et al. [45]
|
2010
|
Beijing
| |
ELISAh
|
IgG positive
|
Stray or pet
|
323
|
58 (17.96)
|
8
|
Huang et al. [37]
|
2011
|
Zhejiang
| |
Test Paperk
|
antigen positive
|
Stray or pet
|
341
|
91 (26.69)
|
10
|
Wu et al. [49]
|
2011
|
Lanzhou, Gansu
|
2010–2011
|
MAT
|
≥ 1:25
|
Stray or pet, Gender, age
|
221
|
47 (21.27)
|
10
|
Wang et al. [48]
|
2012
|
Shanghai
|
2010–2011
|
ELISAd
|
IgG positive
|
Gender, age
|
145
|
25 (17.24)
|
10
|
Qian et al. [44]
|
2012
|
Beijing
|
2009–2011
|
MAT
|
≥ 1:20
|
No
|
64
|
37 (57.81)
|
8
|
Qi et al. [43]
|
2012
|
Beijing
|
2011
|
IHAa
|
≥ 1:64
|
No
|
176
|
7 (3.98)
|
9
|
Wang et al. [47]
|
2012
|
Zhengzhou, Henan
|
2010–2011
|
IHAa
|
≥ 1:64
|
Age
|
195
|
102 (52.31)
|
10
|
Cui et al. [63]
|
2012
|
Beijing
|
2010–2011
|
ELISAc
|
IgG positive
|
Age, gender, season
|
561
|
119 (21.21)
|
8
|
Yu et al. [52]
|
2013
|
Pudong, Shanghai
| |
ELISAc
|
IgG positive
|
Stray or pet
|
27
|
5 (18.52)
|
8
|
Zhuo et al. [60]
|
2013
|
Taizhou, Jiangsu
|
2012
|
IHAa
|
≥ 1:64
|
No
|
215
|
43 (20.00)
|
9
|
Wang et al. [69]
|
2013
|
Fujian
|
2012
|
ELISAd
|
IgG positive
|
No
|
530
|
238 (45.00)
|
7
|
Liu et al. [39]
|
2014
|
Zhenjiang, Jiangsu
|
2013
|
ELISAd
|
IgG positive
|
Stray or pet
|
116
|
24 (20.69)
|
10
|
Deng et al. [34]
|
2014
|
Changsha, Hunan
|
2011–2012
|
ELISAc
|
IgG positive
|
Gender, age
|
75
|
21 (28.00)
|
10
|
Fu et al. [67]
|
2014
|
Xuzhou, Jiangsu
|
2010–2012
|
ELISAc
|
IgG positive
|
No
|
41
|
17 (41.46)
|
8
|
Zhao et al. [57]
|
2015
|
Beijing
|
2012–2014
|
ELISAc
|
IgG positive
|
Season
|
286
|
60 (20.98)
|
9
|
Deng et al. [33]
|
2015
|
Shanghai
|
2014
|
ELISAi
|
IgG positive
|
No
|
91
|
5 (5.49)
|
8
|
Lai et al. [68]
|
2015
|
Beijing
|
2013
|
ELISAi
|
IgG positive
|
No
|
48
|
2 (4.17)
|
8
|
Mayilai et al. [42]
|
2015
|
Kuche, Xinjiang
|
2014
|
ELISAj
|
IgG positive
|
Gender, age
|
87
|
34 (39.08)
|
8
|
Zheng et al. [59]
|
2015
|
Shandong
|
2012–2013
|
ELISAe
|
IgG positive
|
Gender, age
|
589
|
23 (3.90)
|
10
|
Cong et al. [61]
|
2016
|
Lanzhou, Gansu
|
2014–2015
|
MAT
|
≥ 1:25
|
Stray or pet, Gender, age
|
362
|
70 (19.34)
|
10
|
-
Abbreviations: ELISA Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay, IHA Indirect Haemagglutination test, MAT Modified Agglutination Test, Test Paper, test paper for TOXO-Ag
-
aThe test kits were produced by Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science (Cut-off titer 1:64)
-
bBy Shanghai No. 2 Medical School, Parasite Research Section (Cut-off titer 1:80)
-
cBy Zhuhai S.E.Z Haitai Biological Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. (IgG positive)
-
dBy Shenzhen Combined Biotech Co., Ltd. (IgG positive)
-
eBy Shanghai Touching Technology Co., Ltd. (IgG positive)
-
fBy Hubei Academy of Medical Sciences (IgG or CAg positive)
-
gBy Zhejiang Institute of Parasitic Disease (IgG or CAg positive)
-
hBy Animal Medicine College, China Agricultural University (IgG positive)
-
iBy French ID-VET company (IgG positive)
-
jBy Parasite Laboratory of Xinjiang Agricultural University (IgG positive)
-
kBy Quicking Biotech Co., Ltd. (antigen positive)