Skip to main content

Table 3 MAT results in the different cat populations and risk factors

From: Toxoplasma gondii survey in cats from two environments of the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil by Modified Agglutination Test on sera and filter-paper

Location

Entire population

Gendera

Reproductive status

Age class

  

Female

Male

Neutered

Not neutered

NI

Adult

Juvenile

MS

32/265 (12.08)

[8.40–16.60]

20/163 (12.27)

[7.65–18.30]

12/101 (11.88)

[6.20–19.80]

23/196 (11.73)

[7.58–17.10]

1/4 (25)

[0.63–80.60]

8/65 (12.31)

[5.40–22.80]

32/257 (12.45)

[8.67–17.10]

0/8 (0)

[0.00,36.90]

RD

4/107 (3.74)

[1.02–9.30]

3/68 (4.41)

[0.92–12.40]

1/39 (2.56)

[0.06–13.50]

4/42 (9.52)

[2.65–22.60]

0/43 (0)

[0.00–8.20]

0/22 (0)

[0.00–15.40]

3/91 (3.30)

[0.69–9.30]

1/16 (6.25)

[0.16–30.20]

P-value

< 0.01

ns

ns

ns

ns

ns

< 0.01

ns

  1. MS Municipal shelter, RD Residential district, NI the reproductive status was not identified in clinical examination, ns not significant
  2. aSex could not be determined for one cat
  3. Results are expressed as number of positive cats/total number of cats (% positive) [95% confidence interval]