Skip to main content

Table 1 Number and prevalence (%) of positive and negative dogs to Anaplasma spp. antibodies (by ELISA) and A. platys DNA detection (by PCR), and positive to both methods in the different groups

From: Anaplasma spp. in dogs and owners in north-western Morocco

Groupa

Anaplasma spp. antibodies (%)  (n = 425)

A. platys (%)  (n = 362)

Anaplasma spp. and A. platys (%) (n = 362)

Positive

Negative

Positive

Negative

Not available

Group I (n = 95)

11 (2.6)

84 (19.8)

3 (0.8)

88 (24.3)

4

1 (0.3)

Group Ia (n = 63)

7 (1.6)

56 (13.2)

2 (0.5)

57 (15.7)

4

0 (0.0)

Group Ib (n = 32)

4 (0.9)

28 (6.6)

1 (0.3)

31 (8.6)

0

1 (0.3)

Group II (n = 160)

45 (10.6)

115 (27.1)

4 (1.1)

100 (27.6)

56

1 (0.3)

Group III (n = 170)

37 (8.7)

133 (31.3)

20 (5.5)

147 (40.7)

3

9 (2.3)

Total (n = 425)

93 (21.9)

332 (78.1)

27 (7.5)

335 (92.5)

63

11 (3.0)

  1. aGroup I: urban client-owned dogs sample in the VTH; Group Ia: urban client-owned dogs sample in the VTH without clinical signs compatible with a TBD; Group Ib: urban client-owned dogs sample in the VTH with clinical signs compatible with a TBD; Group II: rural client-owned dogs; Group III: military and gendarmerie working dogs