Table 2 Measurements of deterrence compared between Ifakara and West African experimental huts for control net, Olyset® Net and metofluthrin coils at 0.00625% and 0.0097%
No. caught | Median IQR caught | RR | 95% CI | P-value | Z | Deterrence % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control net | |||||||
West African hut | 587 | 8 (4–14.5) | 1 | – | |||
Ifakara hut | 2067 | 37 (27–51) | 3.37 | 2.30–4.94 | < 0.0001 | 6.23 | – |
Olyset® Net | |||||||
West African hut | 553 | 7.5 (3–17.5) | 1 | 6 | |||
Ifakara hut | 1658 | 29.5 (18.5–37.5) | 3.29 | 2.24–4.84 | < 0.0001 | 6.08 | 20 |
Metofluthrin 0.00625% | |||||||
West African hut | 122 | 1 (0–4) | 1 | 78 | |||
Ifakara hut | 1489 | 23 (15–36) | 8.58 | 5.68–12.96 | < 0.0001 | 10.21 | 28 |
Metofluthrin 0.0097% | |||||||
West African hut | 130 | 1 (0–4) | 1 | 79 | |||
Ifakara hut | 1054 | 21 (11–29) | 12.69 | 8.40–19.15 | < 0.0001 | 12.09 | 49 |