Skip to main content

Table 2 Two week-survival and grouping survival values for non-target insects (Honeybees and Cockroachs) treated with Burkina Faso local Metarhizium pingshaense strains (Met_10 and Met_26) compared with wild type Metarhizium pingshaense expressing red fluorescent protein (Met_RFP) at three different concentrations and a control (0.01% Tween)

From: Native entomopathogenic Metarhizium spp. from Burkina Faso and their virulence against the malaria vector Anopheles coluzzii and non-target insects

Non-target insect

Concentration (conidia/ml)a

Treatment

Survival + SE (%)

Grouping survivalb

Honeybee

C1 (1 × 108)

Control

93.8 ± 1

a

Met_RFP

98.2 ± 1

a

Met_S10

98.1 ± 2

a

Met_S26

94.6 ± 2

a

C2 (1 × 107)

Control

94.6 ± 1

a

Met_RFP

97.3 ± 2

a

Met_S10

98.3 ± 1

a

Met_S26

97.3 ± 0

a

C3 (1 × 106)

Control

95.3 ± 1

a

Met_RFP

99.1 ± 1

a

Met_S10

99.0 ± 0

a

Met_S26

95.1 ± 2

a

Cockroach

C1 (1 × 108)

Control

95.7 ± 2

a

Met_RFP

97.8 ± 2

a

Met_S10

98.8 ± 1

a

Met_S26

97.5 ± 1

a

C2 (1 × 107)

Control

96.1 ± 2

a

Met_RFP

97.5 ± 1

a

Met_S10

98.7 ± 1

a

Met_S26

97.7 ± 1

a

C3 (1 × 106)

Control

96.0 ± 1

a

Met_RFP

97.0 ± 1

a

Met_S10

97.0 ± 1

a

Met_S26

96.0 ± 1

a

  1. Abbreviation: SE standard error of the mean
  2. aIn 0.01% Tween80
  3. bPairwise comparison of survival mean values per spraying conidia suspension concentrations; treatments with no letters in common differ significantly at P < 0.05