Table 3 Comparison of male and female Musca domestica and Musca sorbens from pot and sticky traps
From: Comparing trap designs and methods for assessing density of synanthropic flies in Odisha, India
| Â | Total | Total no. (Median, IQR) | Difference (IRR) | 95% CI | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M. domestica | |||||
 Pot trap | 2753 | 9 (1.5–27) | Ref. |  |  |
 Sticky trap | 6408 | 25 (7–50) | 2.19 | 1.62–2.96 | <0.001 |
M. domestica male | |||||
 Pot trap | 2101 | 7 (1–18) | Ref. |  |  |
 Sticky trap | 4936 | 19 (6–39) | 2.21 | 1.64–2.98 | <0.001 |
M. domestica female | |||||
 Pot trap | 652 | 1 (0–4) | Ref. |  |  |
 Sticky trap | 1472 | 5 (1–15) | 2.12 | 1.49–3.02 | <0.001 |
M. sorbens | |||||
 Pot trap | 362 | 0 (0–2.5) | Ref. |  |  |
 Sticky trap | 738 | 1 (0–6) | 1.92 | 1.24–2.97 | 0.003 |
M. sorbens male | |||||
 Pot trap | 263 | 0 (0–2) | Ref. |  |  |
 Sticky trap | 555 | 1 (0–5) | 1.99 | 1.27–3.10 | 0.003 |
M. sorbens female | |||||
 Pot trap | 99 | 0 (0–0) | Ref. |  |  |
 Sticky trap | 183 | 0 (0–1) | 1.74 | 1.02–2.98 | 0.043 |