Skip to main content

Table 4 Estimates of a negative binomial regression for comparison of vector density between pit shelter and other trapping methods in western Kenya

From: Evaluation of the performance of new sticky pots for outdoor resting malaria vector surveillance in western Kenya

Species and place of collection

Trapping method

Ahero

Iguhu

Exponentiated estimate (OR)

P-value

Exponentiated estimate (OR)

P-value

An. gambiae (s.l.)

 Outdoors

Pit shelter

1.0a

 

1.0a

 

Sticky pot

0.25 (0.20–0.33)

< 0.001

0.22 (0.10–0.47)

< 0.001

Clay pot

0.16 (0.12–0.20)

< 0.001

0.17 (0.07–0.39)

< 0.001

Light trap

0.34 (0.26–0.44)

< 0.001

1.40 (0.86–2.27)

0.173

Exit trap

0.10 (0.07–0.13)

< 0.001

3.65 (2.37–5.61)

< 0.001

 Indoors

Prokopack

0.31 (0.24–0.41)

< 0.001

1.37 (0.85–2.21)

0.199

Light trap

0.34 (0.26–0.44)

< 0.001

2.76 (1.77–4.30)

< 0.001

An. funestus group

 Outdoors

Pit shelter

1.0a

 

1.0a

 

Sticky pot

0.20 (0.122–0.33)

< 0.001

0.75 (0.17–3.35)

0.716

Clay pot

0.12 (0.07–0.21)

< 0.001

0.50 (0.09–2.80)

0.433

Light trap

2.25 (1.58–3.21)

< 0.001

3.27 (1.04–10.33)

0.044

Exit trap

2.36 (1.68–3.32)

< 0.001

4.37 (1.43–13.40)

0.010

 Indoors

Prokopack

0.94 (0.64–1.36)

0.726

10.37 (3.60–29.88)

< 0.001

Light trap

5.83 (4.14–8.20)

< 0.001

12.33 (4.3–35.30)

< 0.001

  1. aReference value
  2. Abbreviation: OR-odds ratio