Skip to main content

Table 1 Spearman’s rho correlation coefficient (rs) and Lin’s concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) between FEC from individual and pooled samples according the pool size and the FEC values (whole, D0 or D14) and between FECR(%) from individual samples and FECR(%) from individual samples at D14 and pooled samples at D0 according the pool size

From: Rapid assessment of faecal egg count and faecal egg count reduction through composite sampling in cattle

Pool size

No. of pools

r s

95% CI

CCC

95% CI

Faecal egg count

 Pool of 5 samples

58

0.98

0.95–0.99

0.99

0.98–0.99

 Pool of 10 samples

42

0.97

0.92–0.99

0.97

0.94–0.98

 Global pool

58

0.95

0.91–0.97

0.97

0.95–0.98

 Global pool on-farm

26

0.94

0.82–0.98

0.93

0.88–0.96

 Pool of 5 samples (D0)

29

0.98

0.93–0.99

0.98

0.96–0.99

 Pool of 10 samples (D0)

21

0.98

0.90–1.00

0.94

0.86–0.98

 Global pool (D0)

29

0.91

0.75–0.97

0.95

0.90–0.98

 Pool of 5 samples (D14)

29

0.84

0.64–0.94

0.96

0.93–0.97

 Pool of 10 samples (D14)

21

0.79

0.51–0.92

0.95

0.90–0.98

 Global pool (D14)

29

0.69

0.39–0.86

0.94

0.89–0.97

Faecal egg count reduction

 Pool of 5 samples

29

1.00

0.99–1.00

0.97

0.95–0.98

 Pool of 10 samples

21

0.88

0.72–0.95

0.82

0.65–0.91

 Global pool

29

0.80

0.62–0.91

0.82

0.70–0.90

 Global pool on-farm

13

0.68

0.20–0.90

0.89

0.85–0.91