From: Insecticide resistance in Culex quinquefasciatus Say, 1823 in Brazil: a review
Macro Region | State | Region | Year | Insecticide | Bioassay | Diagnostic-dose | Biochemical and molecular assays | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dose–response | ||||||||||
RR50 (LC50 or LT50) or RR95 (LC95) | Dose (%mortality) | Statusd | Method | Detected mechanism | Reference | |||||
North | Amazonas | Manaus | 1978 | Chlorpyriphos | 1.3 (0.0008) | – | S | – | – | Curtis & Pasteur [48] |
North-East | Pernambuco | Recife | 1995 | – | – | – | – | Sequencing | G119S ace-1R | Weill et al. [64] |
Coquea | 1991–1993 | Lysinibacillus sphaericus | 9.7 (0.0367) | – | Low resistance | Binding experiments | Slight decrease in the receptor concentration | Silva-Filha et al. [86] | ||
1991–1993 | Bacillus thuringiensis svar. israelensis | 2.0 (0.01) | – | S | – | – | Silva-Filha et al. [86] | |||
1996 | Lysinibacillus sphaericus | 1.3–7.3 (0.0013–0.0313) | – | Low resistance | – | – | Silva-Filha & Regis [87] | |||
1996 | Bacillus thuringiensis svar. israelensis | 1.0 (0.009) | – | S | – | – | Silva-Filha & Regis [87] | |||
Água Friaa | 2005–2010 | Lysinibacillus sphaericus | 2.7–8.6 (0.008–0.024) | – | Low resistance | AS-PCR | cqm1REC (0.033–0.055)e; cqm1REC-D25 (0.002)e | |||
2009–2010 | Temephos | 1 (0.006) | – | S | – | – | Amorim et al. [51] | |||
Azeitonaa | 1999 | Lysinibacillus sphaericus | – | – | – | AS-PCR | cqm1REC (0.002)e; cqm1REC-D16 (0.006)e | Chalegre et al. [89] | ||
Roda de Fogoa | 1999 | Lysinibacillus sphaericus | – | – | – | AS-PCR | cqm1REC (0.017)e | Chalegre et al. [89] | ||
Fazenda Nova | 2007 | Lysinibacillus sphaericus | 3.7 (0.011) | – | S | AS-PCR | cqm1REC (0.0029)e | Chalegre et al. [88] | ||
Peixinhosa | 2007 | Lysinibacillus sphaericus | 4 (0.012) | – | S | AS-PCR | cqm1REC (0.0061)e | Chalegre et al. [88] | ||
2009–2010 | Temephos | 1 (0.006) | – | S | – | – | Amorim et al. [51] | |||
Jaboatão dos Guararapes | 2010 | Lysinibacillus sphaericus | 4.3 (0.017) | – | S | AS-PCR | cqm1REC (0.001)e; cqm1REC-D16 (0.003)e | Chalegre et al. [89] | ||
2010 | Lysinibacillus sphaericus | – | – | – | Multiplex PCR | cqm1REC (0.003)e; cqm1REC-2 (0.002)e | Menezes et al. [85] | |||
2009–2010 | Temephos | 0.57 (0.002) | – | S | – | – | Amorim et al. [51] | |||
Glória do Goitá Ipojuca | 2009–2010 | Temephos | 1.5 (0.009) | – | S | – | – | Amorim et al. [51] | ||
2009–2010 | Temephos | 0.6 (0.0019) | – | S | – | – | Amorim et al. [51] | |||
2010 | Lysinibacillus sphaericus | 3.3 (0.013) | – | S | AS-PCR | cqm1REC (0.003)e | Chalegre et al. [89] | |||
Santa Cruz do Capibaribe | 2009–2010 | Temephos | 5.8 (0.036) | – | Moderate resistance | Enzymatic assays and AS-PCR | G119S ace-1R (0.11)e; α-esterase (> 30%); β-esterase (> 17%) | Amorim et al. [51] | ||
Ceará | Fortaleza | 1993 | – | – | – | – | Enzymatic assays | Esterase C2 | Yebákima et al. [60] | |
Center-West | Mato Grosso | Cuiabá | 2000 | Temephos | – | 0.012–0,06 ppm (95–100%) | Tolerant | – | – | Campos & Andrade [50] |
Mato Grosso do Sul | Campo Grande | 1998 | Temephos | – | 0.04 ppm (88.09); 0.045 ppm (93.71%) | R | – | Metabolic resistance (suggested) | Campos & Andrade [50] | |
2012 | – | – | – | – | AS-PCR | L1014F kdr mutation (0.01)e | Steinhagem et al. [77] | |||
Naviraí | 2013 | Temephos | – | 0.004 ppm (18–20%) | R | – | – | Scudeler et al. [52] | ||
South-East | Rio de Janeiro | Rio de Janeiro | 1978 | Chlorpyriphos | 2.2 (0.001) | – | Low resistance | – | – | Curtis & Pasteur [48] |
1994 | Malathion | 2.2 (0.15) | – | S | Sinergists tests | Mixed function oxidase and increased esterases | Gonzáles et al. [49] | |||
Chlorpyriphos | 78.9 (0.0005) | – | R | – | Mixed function oxidase and increased esterases | |||||
Pirimiphos-methil | 4.4 (0.026) | – | S | – | – | |||||
Propoxur | 5.1 (0.51) | – | S | Sinergists tests | Mixed function oxidase and increased esterases | |||||
Cypermethrin | 3.4 (0.0008) | – | S | – | – | |||||
Deltamethrin | 3.2 (0.0003) | – | S | – | – | |||||
Lambda-cyhalothrin | 6.0 (0.0003) | – | S | Sinergists tests | Mixed function oxidase and increased esterases | |||||
DDT | 11.8 (0.025) | – | R | – | – | |||||
1995 | Malathion | 43.81 (0.609) | – | R | Enzymatic assays | Elevated esterase and altered AChE | Coto et al. [24] | |||
2012 | – | – | – | – | AS-PCR | L1014F kdr mutation (0.04)e | Steinhagem et al. [77] | |||
Niterói | 2012 | – | – | – | – | L1014F kdr mutation (0.07)e | ||||
São Paulo | Pinheiro River | 2005 | Lysinibacillus sphaericus | 0.6–2.85 (0.009–0.0454) | – | S | – | – | Andrade et al. [30] | |
2006 | Lysinibacillus sphaericus | 5 (0.015) | – | S | – | – | Silva-Filha et al. [91] | |||
1995 | Fenitrothion, malathion and propoxur | – | 1% (47.5%); 5% (58.8%); 0.1% (59.4%) | R | – | – | Bracco et al. [53] | |||
1995 | DDT and permetrin | – | 4%; 0.25% (100%) | S | – | – | ||||
1995–1996 | Fenitrothion, malathion and propoxur | 11.20 (136.3)c; 3.33 (32.9)c; 3.01 (200)c | – | R | Enzymatic assays | G119S ace-1R (0.12–0,17)e; α-esterase (> 11.2%) | Bracco et al. [54] | |||
Campinas | 1999–2001 | Temephos | 6.36 (0.0076) | – | R | – | Metabolic resistance (suggested) | Campos & Andrade [50] | ||
1999–2001 | Cypermethrin | – | 0.0096 ppm (11.17%) | R | – | Metabolic resistance (suggested) | ||||
1999–2001 | Cyfluthrin | – | 0.002–0.03 ppm (0.42–47.5%) | R | – | Metabolic resistance (suggested) | ||||
Minas Gerais | Belo Horizonte | 2012 | – | – | – | – | AS-PCR | L1014F kdr mutation (0.04)e | Steinhagem et al. [77] | |
South | Rio Grande do Sul | Porto Alegre | 1989–1991 | Lysinibacillus sphaericus and Bacillus thuringiensis svar. israelensis | – | 1250 mg/m2 (100%) | S | – | – | Ruas-Neto et al. [97] |
1989–1991 | Tetramethrine/PBO | – | 5 mg/m2 (97.87%) | S | – | – | ||||
Feliz | 1989–1991 | Lysinibacillus sphaericus and Bacillus thuringiensis svar. israelensis | – | 1250 mg/m2 (100%) | S | – | – | |||
1989–1991 | Temephos and fenthion | 0.86b (7.4×103) and 1.39b (0.24) | – | S | – | – |