Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of top-ranked spatial lag models. AICc and R2 values for six best performing spatial lag models, as well as variable coefficients and corresponding significance levels

From: Spatial variation in the frequency of knockdown resistance genotypes in Florida Aedes aegypti populations

Model

1

2

3

4

5

6

AICc

− 24.82

− 24.20

− 24.17

− 23.70

− 23.68

− 23.61

R2

0.49

0.49

0.47

0.46

0.46

0.49

Intercept

0.32***

0.32***

0.30***

0.32***

0.32***

0.32

October EVI

0.05*

  

0.04

0.06*

 

July LAI

0.07**

0.07**

0.07**

0.07**

 

0.08***

Percent tree cover

0.07**

0.07**

 

0.05*

0.07**

0.05*

Percent non-tree vegetation

− 0.05*

− 0.05

  

− 0.06*

 

Pyrethroid use

− 0.08***

− 0.09***

− 0.08***

− 0.09***

− 0.07**

− 0.09***

Distance from roads

0.04*

0.04*

0.04

0.04

0.05*

0.08

January EVI

 

0.05*

   

0.04

Distance from forest

  

− 0.03

   

Median income

  

0.07**

   

January LAI

    

0.06**

 
  1. Notes: Each column corresponds with a single model. The first two rows show the AICc and R2 values for six best performing spatial lag models. The remaining rows show the variable coefficients and corresponding significance levels for each model
  2. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ****P < 0.001