Skip to main content

Table 3 Hierarchical multiple regression analysis with fear of tick-borne diseases among livestock as outcome variable

From: Livestock owners’ worry and fear of tick-borne diseases

Fear of tick-borne disease

Model 1

Disease hazards

(n = 704)

Final model

Livestock owners’ appraisals

(n = 704)

B

SE B

β

B

SE B

β

Constant

4.04

0.21

 

0.74

1.18

 

Lyme borreliosis

4.32

2.22

0.07(*)

− 0.95

1.90

− 0.02

Anaplasmosis (sheep)

12.86

5.52

0.09

4.72

4.57

0.03

Anaplasmosis (cattle)

23.09

13.43

0.07*

16.28

11.04

0.05

Babesiosis

26.44

11.12

0.10*

− 0.37

9.34

− 0.01

Cattle = 1,

Sheep + both = 2

   

0.08

0.29

0.01

Sheep = 1,

Cattle + both = 2

   

− 0.06

0.22

− 0.01

Personal experience

1 = no, 2 = yes

   

0.97

0.22

0.17***

Relevance (low-high)

   

0.912

0.10

0.36***

Implication (negative-positive)

   

− 0.69

0.15

− 0.15***

Social trust (low-high)

   

− 0.04

0.11

− 0.01

Emotion based coping (low-high)

   

0.67

0.14

0.17***

Information-seeking coping (low-high)

   

0.30

0.13

0.08*

Action-based coping (low-high)

   

− 0.09

0.14

− 0.02

Norm compatibility (low-high)

   

− 0.07

0.15

− 0.01

 

F(4, 699) = 6.89, P < 0.001,

R2 = .04, R2adj = 0.03

F(14, 689) = 28.03, P < 0.001,

R2 = .36, R2adj = 0.35

  1. Notes: In the first model, data for current disease hazards are entered as predictor variables. In the final model, the livestock owners’ emotional appraisals are added
  2. (*)P = 0.052, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001