Skip to main content

Table 3 A list of main effects of all candidate models considered in analyses of land cover effects on mosquito relative abundance

From: Effects of seasonality and land use on the diversity, relative abundance, and distribution of mosquitoes on St. Kitts, West Indies

Name

Main effects

ΔAIC

K

H1

Precip + LocalAgriculture + LocalUrban + LocalRainforest + LocalMangrove + spp*Mangrove

11.4

26

H2

Precip + LocalAnthropogenic

53.6

11

H3

Precip + LocalAgriculture + LocalUrban

31

15

H4

Precip + LocalAnthropogenic + m_trait:Mangrove

38.6

14

H5

Precip + LocalAgriculture + LocalUrban + m_trait:Mangrove

14.5

18

H6

Precip + LocalScrub+ LocalAnthropogenic + m_trait:Mangrove

37.2

18

H7

Precip + LocalAgriculture + LocalUrban + LocalScrub+ m_trait:Mangrove

15

22

H8

Precip + LocalRainforest + LocalAnthropogenic + m_trait:Mangrove

25.6

18

H9

Precip + LocalAgriculture + LocalUrban + LocalRainforest + m_trait:Mangrove

3.9

20

H10

Precip + LocalRainforest + LocalScrub+ LocalAnthropogenic + m_trait:Mangrove

26.8

22

H11

Precip + LocalAgriculture + LocalUrban + LocalRainforest + LocalScrub+ m_trait:Mangrove

3.9

26

H12

Precip + LocalAgriculture + LocalUrban + LocalRainforest + m_trait*Mangrove

0

22

  1. Notes: Models were ranked in terms of the difference between a given AIC score and that with the lowest AIC score (minAIC): ΔAIC=AIC-min(AIC). K represents the number of parameters in each model
  2. *Two variables with full factorial interaction comprised of main effects and interaction terms; “:”, cases where only the interaction term is evaluated
Back to article page

Parasites & Vectors

ISSN: 1756-3305

Contact us