Table 3 Univariate logistic regression analysis of association between LF-related hydrocoele and individual/household risk factors; weighted and adjusted for survey design (n = 269)

Individual risk factors

 Age (by year)

–

1.05

1.03–1.08

 Occupation

  None/home duties

10.45

1.85

0.17–2.82

  Student

0

–

  Manual labour

3.32

0.54

0.04–6.89

  Other (ref)

5.93

1.00

 Work environment

  Outdoor

0.85

0.20^c

0.05–0.72

  Indoor or mixed

7.29

 Moved to current village of residence

  Yes

7.68

2.14

0.45–10.24

  No

3.75

 CFA^d positive

  Yes

12.25

3.65

0.81–16.38

  No

3.69

 Microfilariae positive^e

  Yes

18.18

5.39

0.83–35.04

  No

3.96

 Never taken MDA medication

  Yes

4.66

1.15

0.22–5.98

  No

4.07

Household risk factors

 Township

  Amarapura

13.92

11.12

1.85–66.89

  Patheingyi

8.02

5.98

0.40–89.48

  Tada-U

1.73

1.21

0.08–17.21

  Wundwin (ref)

1.44

1.00

 Log household monthly income

1.43

0.77–2.64

 Highest HH education

  None/primary

2.74

0.26

0.03–2.78

  Secondary

3.29

0.32

0.04–2.41

  Tertiary (ref)

9.72

1.00

 Drinking water type (by WHO classification)

–

1.01

0.41–2.47

 Sanitation type (by WHO classification)

–

0.26

0.04–1.63

 Elevation (by metre)

–

0.98

0.96–1.01

 Distance to nearest water body (per km)

–

0.95

0.89–1.01

 No. of people per HH room (ratio)

–

1.35

0.92–1.98