Skip to main content

Table 1 Relative trapping efficacy of human landing catch (HLC), mosquito-electrocuting traps (METs) and BG-Sentinel (BGS) traps evaluated individually in a no-choice test and in competition with HLC in a choice test, in the presence of two freestanding transfluthrin passive emanators (treatment) and with no transfluthrin (control)

From: Semi-field evaluation of the exposure-free mosquito electrocuting trap and BG-Sentinel trap as an alternative to the human landing catch for measuring the efficacy of transfluthrin emanators against Aedes aegypti

 

Transfluthrin

Control

 

Total recapture (% released)

“Trap” recapture position 1

(% recaptured)

HLC recapture position 2

(% recaptured)

Relative trapping efficacya

OR (95% CI)b

P-value

Total recapture (% released)

“Trap” recapture position 1

(% recaptured)

HLC recapture position 2

(% recaptured)

Relative trapping efficacya

OR (95% CI)b

P-value

No-choice

            

HLC

 

192 (24)

1

1

 

571 (71)

1

1

MET

 

163 (20)

0.85

0.82 (0.69–1.14)

0.245

 

372 (47)

0.63

0.34 (0.25–0.46)

 < 0.001

BGS

 

174 (22)

0.91

0.89 (0.64–1.24)

0.490

 

487 (61)

0.85

0.61 (0.45–0.83)

0.002

Choice

            

HLC + HLC

402 (50)

208 (26)

194 (24)

1

1

711 (89)

335 (42)

376 (47)

1

1

MET + HLC

232 (29)

22 (2)

210 (26)

0.11

0.07 (0.04–0.13)

 < 0.001

480 (60)

96 (12)

384 (48)

0.29

0.18 (0.13–0.25)

 < 0.001

BGS + HLC

307 (38)

38 (5)

269 (34)

0.18

0.05 (0.02–0.13)

 < 0.001

618 (77)

53 (7)

565 (71)

0.16

0.09 (0.05–0.15)

 < 0.001

  1. The average proportion of released mosquitoes that was recaptured in the transfluthrin and control arm is presented as well as the total number of mosquitoes recaptured by each method out of 800 Aedes aegypti mosquitoes released over eight replicates
  2. aRelative trapping efficacy of METs and BGS traps compared to HLC in no-choice and choice tests in both the treatment and the control arms (both in position 1)
  3. bThe odds ratio (OR) estimates were derived from Stata output adjusted for temperature and humidity and presented with a 95% confidence interval