|
Category
|
Collection Method
|
Kakola Ombaka
|
Masogo
|
|---|
|
Mean
|
Risk ratio
|
Lower CL
|
Upper CL
|
P-value
|
Mean
|
Risk ratio
|
Lower CL
|
Upper CL
|
P-value
|
|---|
|
An. funestus
|
MET
|
2.68
|
1.98
|
0.88
|
4.46
|
0.1
|
0.12
|
0.24
|
0.05
|
1.03
|
0.05
|
|
FTT
|
6.88
|
5.59
|
2.49
|
12.55
|
< 0.001
|
2.16
|
4.38
|
1.62
|
11.8
|
0.004
|
|
HDT
|
1.76
|
1.38
|
0.60
|
3.18
|
0.44
|
0.36
|
0.66
|
0.21
|
2.09
|
0.48
|
|
OLT
|
1.20
|
0.88
|
0.37
|
2.11
|
0.78
|
0.24
|
0.45
|
0.13
|
1.57
|
0.21
|
|
HLC
|
1.48
|
Ref
| | | |
0.52
|
Ref
| | | |
|
An. arabiensis
|
MET
|
8.40
|
4.67
|
2.44
|
8.93
|
< 0.001
|
0.28
|
0.59
|
0.19
|
1.87
|
0.37
|
|
FTT
|
13.64
|
7.58
|
3.98
|
14.42
|
< 0.001
|
2.26
|
5.37
|
2.17
|
13.24
|
< 0.001
|
|
HDT
|
10.24
|
5.69
|
2.98
|
10.86
|
< 0.001
|
0.68
|
1.32
|
0.49
|
3.59
|
0.58
|
|
OLT
|
3.56
|
1.98
|
1.01
|
3.86
|
0.05
|
0.92
|
1.83
|
0.70
|
4.79
|
0.22
|
|
HLC
|
1.80
|
Ref
| | | |
0.52
|
Ref
| | | |
|
An. coustani
|
MET
|
9.56
|
1.11
|
0.61
|
2.03
|
0.74
|
0.08
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
Inf
|
1.00
|
|
FTT
|
7.12
|
0.66
|
0.35
|
1.23
|
0.19
|
0.24
|
7.50
|
0.24
|
2.37
|
0.62
|
|
HDT
|
1.80
|
0.18
|
0.09
|
0.37
|
< 0.001
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
Inf
|
1.00
|
|
OLT
|
23.00
|
3.03
|
1.65
|
5.56
|
< 0.001
|
0.92
|
2.88
|
1.15
|
7.22
|
0.02
|
|
HLC
|
10.52
|
Ref
| | | |
0.32
|
Ref
| | | |
- The models included terms for collection methods and an interaction term. The risk ratios (RR) were generated by exponentiating the model coefficients
