Skip to main content

Table 5 Risk factors associated with tick infestation on equid hosts

From: Risk factors associated with tick infestations on equids in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan, with notes on Rickettsia massiliae detection

Variables

Condition

No. examined equids

No of tick-infested equids (%)

Mean (SD)

Relative risk (95% confidence interval)

P value (χ2)

Gender

Male

330

294 (91)

312.0 (25.46)

0.7432 (0.64–0.85)

0.001 (12.05,1)

Female

74

30 (9)

52.00 (31.11)

Age groups (years)

1–3

100

50 (15)

75.00 (35.36)

1.268 (1.10–1.45)

0.002 (9.548, 1)

4–6

304

274 (85)

289.0 (21.21)

Altitude

Hilly areas

140

140 (43)

143.5 (4.950)

0.8485 (0.73–0.97)

0.02 (5.562, 1)

Plain areas

264

184 (57)

220.5 (51.62)

Housing

Mud

213

203 (63)

208.0 (7.071)

Concrete

56

38 (11)

38.00 (25.46)

0.6949 (0.58–0.81)

0.001 (13.11, 1)

Semi-concrete

135

83 (26)

174.0 (55.15)

0.8268 (0.71–0.95)

0.01 (6.645, 1)

Grazing

Open

246

229 (71)

237.5 (12.02)

0.8293 (0.72–0.94)

0.01 (7.597, 1)

Domesticated

158

95 (29)

126.5 (44.55)

Living management

Single

115

63 (19)

89.00 (36.77)

1.230 (1.07–1.40)

0.01 (7.921, 1)

Herd

289

261 (81)

275.0 (19.80)

Food supply

Fresh

295

238 (73)

266.5 (40.31)

0.9902 (0.85–1.14)

0.9 (0.0171, 1)

Stored

109

86 (27)

97.50 (16.26)