Metagenomics of the midgut microbiome of Rhipicephalus microplus from China

Parasites & Vectors

Table 1 Quality control results for metagenomic DNA of each sample

Sample^a	InsertSize^b (bp)	RawData^c	CleanData^d	Clean Q20^e	Clean Q30^f	Clean GC^g (%)	Effective^h (%)
R.M.1	350	5129.63	5109.71	97.43	93.02	44.62	99.61
R.M.2	350	5487.17	5472.01	97.63	93.44	44.58	99.72
R.M.3	350	5240.75	5226.79	97.77	93.79	44.95	99.73
R.M.4	350	5499.14	5481.69	97.72	93.77	45.28	99.68
R.M.5	350	5402.47	5388.41	97.72	93.72	45.11	99.74

^aSample name
^bUse of the 350-base pair library
^cRaw data off the computer
^dEffective data obtained by filtering
^eSequencing error rate in CleanData is < 0.01 (quality is the percentage of bases with a value > 20)
^fSequencing error rate in CleanData is < 0.001 (quality is the percentage of bases with a value > 30)
^gGC proportion of the bases in CleanData
^hPercentage of valid data (CleanData) and raw data (RawData)

ISSN: 1756-3305