Skip to main content

Table 3 Distribution of Babesia-positive blood across the study sites

From: Molecular survey of Babesia parasites in Kenya: first detailed report on occurrence of Babesia bovis in cattle

Sampling site

Total number of Babesia-positive samples by gene

Sub-county

Number of animals

No. of animals B. bovis positive with 18S

n (prevalence)

(95% CI prevalence)

No. of animals B. bovis positive with cytochrome b

n (prevalence)

(95% CI prevalence)

No. of animals B. bovis positive with both 18S & cytochrome b genes

n (prevalence)

(95% CI prevalence)

No. of B. bigemina positive animals

n (prevalence)

(95% CI prevalence)

No. of animals having both B. bovis and B. bigemina mixed infection

n (prevalence)

(95% CI prevalence)

Matuga

203

6 (3.0%)

(1.2–6.6%)

33 (16.3%)

(11.6–22.2%)

34 (16.7%)

(12.0–22.8%)

27 (13.3%)

(9.1–18.9%)

9 (4.4%)

(2.2–8.5%)

Msambweni

129

5 (3.9%)

(1.4–9.3%)

6 (4.7%)

(1.9–10.3%)

7 (5.4%)

(2.4–11.3%)

13 (10.1%)

(5.7–16.9%)

2 (1.6%)

(0.3–6.1%)

Lunga Lunga

174

28 (16.1%)

(11.1–22.6%)

42 (24.1%)

(18.1–31.3%)

46 (26.4%)

(20.2–33.8%)

30 (17.2%%)

(12.1–23.9%)

16 (9.2%)

(5.5–14.8%)

Total

506

39 (7.7%)

(5.6–10.4%)

81 (16.0%)

(12.9–19.6%)

87 (17.2%)

(14.1–20.8%)

70 (13.8%)

(11.0–17.2%)

27 (5.3%)

(3.6–7.8%)

  1. The prevalence of each Babesia infection was estimated as the proportion of total samples per sub-county with each gene. The sampling site (sub-county) was statistically associated with prevalence of Babesia infection (χ2 = 72.4, df = 8, P < 0.0001)