Parasites & Vectors

Table 3 Accuracy of near-infrared spectrometry to predict the infectious status of laboratory-reared, experimentally infected and wild Anopheles coluzzii based on two preservation procedures

From: Adapting field-mosquito collection techniques in a perspective of near-infrared spectroscopy implementation

Model trained on							Model predicting
Mosquito	Killed	Preserved	Number	Within-sample accuracy (%)			Mosquito	Killed	Preserved	Number	Out-of-sample accuracy (%)
Mosquito	Killed	Preserved	Number	Accuracy	TPR	TNR	Mosquito	Killed	Preserved	Number	Accuracy	TPR	TNR
Laboratory-reared	Chloroform	Fresh	365	64	68	63	Laboratory	Chloroform	Silica gel	365	49	43	53
		Fresh	365	64	68	63	Field	Chloroform	Fresh	460	50	49	50
		Silica gel	365	61	55	67	Laboratory	Chloroform	Fresh	365	52	52	52
		Silica gel	365	61	55	67	Field	Chloroform	Silica gel	327	51	60	43
Field-caught	Chloroform	Fresh all	460	56	61	51	Field	Chloroform	Silica gel	223	47	45	48
		Fresh all	460	56	61	51	Field	Chloroform	Ethanol	237	52	51	52
		Silica gel	223	63	57	69	Field	Chloroform	Ethanol	237	53	45	62
		Ethanol	237	54	31	77	Field	Chloroform	Silica gel	223	54	38	70

Results are shown for overall accuracy, the true negative rate (TNR) and the true positive rate (TPR)

Back to article page

ISSN: 1756-3305

Contact us

Submission enquiries: journalsubmissions@springernature.com