Table 2 Distributions of Culex pipiens forms in Morocco
From: No association between habitat, autogeny and genetics in Moroccan Culex pipiens populations
Regions | No. dissected specimens | Autogeny status | CQ11F marker | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Autogeny status | N (%) | No. of genotyped individuals | pipiens | molestus | heterozygotes | ||
Tanger | 100 | Autogenous | 1 (1%) | 1 | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
Anautogenous | 99 (99%) | 60 | 37 (61.6%) | 9 (15.0%) | 14 (23.3%) | ||
Total (%) | 61 | 60.6% | 16.3% | 22.9% | |||
Larache | 100 | Autogenous | 0 (0%) | – | – | – | – |
Anautogenous | 100 (100%) | 60 | 38 (63.3%) | 1 (1.6%) | 21 (35.0%) | ||
Total (%) | 60 | 63.3% | 1.6% | 35.0% | |||
Mohammedia | 100 | Autogenous | 0 (0%) | – | – | – | – |
Anautogenous | 100 (100%) | 60 | 36 (60.0%) | 6 (10.0%) | 18 (30.0%) | ||
Total (%) | 60 | 60.0% | 10.0% | 30.0% | |||
Casablanca | 100 | Autogenous | 4 (4%) | 4 | 1 (25.0%) | 3 (75.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
Anautogenous | 96 (96%) | 60 | 34 (56.6%) | 6 (10.0%) | 20 (33.3%) | ||
Total (%) | 64 | 54.0% | 14.0% | 31.2% | |||
Marrakech | 100 | Autogenous | 0 (0%) | – | – | – | – |
Anautogenous | 100 (100%) | 60 | 36 (60%) | 8 (13.3%) | 16 (26.6%) | ||
Total (%) | 60 | 60.0% | 13.3% | 26.6% | |||
Agadir | 120 | Autogenous | 21 (17.5%) | 21 | 8 (38.0%) | 9 (42.8%) | 4 (19.0%) |
Anautogenous | 99 (82.5%) | 99 | 35 (35.3%) | 43 (43.4%) | 21 (21.2%) | ||
Total (%) | 120 | 35.8% | 43.3% | 20.8% | |||