Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of the estimated mean catch for each trap analysed using the negative binomial generalized linear mixed model

From: Comparative evaluation of different versions of exposure-free mosquito electrocuting traps and barrier screen trap for monitoring outdoor densities and biting time phenotypes by malaria and filariasis vectors in Tanzania

Trap type

RR [95% CI]

P-value

An. arabiensis

 METe

1a

NA

 METc

0.76 [0.42–1.39]

0.38

 BST

1.13 [0.63–2.04]

0.69

Culex spp.

 METe

1a

NA

 METc

0.87 [0.62–1.22]

0.42

 BST

0.80 [0.57–1.12]

0.19

  1. CI Cconfidence interval, NA not applicable, RR relative rate
  2. aReference group