Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of diagnostic tests in detection of infection with D. immitis for Townsville and Brisbane dogs combined

From: Prevalence of canine heartworm infection in Queensland, Australia: comparison of diagnostic methods and investigation of factors associated with reduction in antigen detection

Diagnostic tests compared

No. of dogs with each combination of results

Estimated difference (%) (95% CI)a

P valueb

Bonferroni corrected P valuec

 + / + 

 + / −

− / + 

 − / − 

Antigen testing after heat treatment/conventional antigen testing

48

22

0

313

5.7% (3.2, 8.3)

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

Antigen testing after heat treatment/modified Knott’s test

37

33

0

313

8.6% (5.5, 11.7)

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

Conventional antigen testing/modified Knott’s test

29

19

8

327

2.9% (− 0.03, 5.8)

 < 0.03

 < 0.10

Antigen testing after heat treatment/conventional antigen testing and modified Knott’s test combined

56

14

0

313

3.7% (1.5, 5.8)

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

  1. aUsing McNemar’s test
  2. bMid-P value for McNemar’s test, without Bonferroni correction
  3. cMid-P value for McNemar’s test, with Bonferroni correction