Parasites & Vectors

Table 3 F_ST pairwise comparison (with F_ST P-values) of nad1 sequences of Isthmiophora melis derived from seven populations in Poland

From: The genetic structure of populations of Isthmiophora melis (Schrank, 1788) (Digenea: Echinostomatidae). Does the host’s diet matter?

	BNP	DNP	NNP	WMNP	SNP	VR	RMP
BNP	–	0.1351 ± 0.0339	< 0.02	0.0811 ± 0.0163	0.2252 ± 0.0311	0.1441 ± 0.0388	0.1441 ± 0.0388
DNP	0.0326	–	< 0.0001	0.8468 ± 0.0365	0.3153 ± 0.0434	0.6577 ± 0.0430	0.6577 ± 0.0430
NNP	0.1044	0.1649	–	< 0.0001	0.0270 ± 0.0139	< 0.02	< 0.02
WMNP	0.0489	−0.0349	0.2319	–	0.1261 ± 0.0242	0.1802 ± 0.0271	0.1802 ± 0.0271
SNP	0.0138	0.0133	0.0620	0.0623	–	0.0991 ± 0.0417
VR	0.1051	0.1278	0.0328	0.0753	0.0405	–	0.0450 ± 0.0152
RMP	0.0295	−0.0211	0.1066	0.0232	−0.0186	0.0753	–

BNP—Biebrza National Park, DNP—Drawa National Park, NNP—Narew National Park, WMNP—Warta Mouth National Park, RMP—Milicz Ponds Nature Reserve. Above diagonal—F_ST P-values; below diagonal—F_ST values

Back to article page

ISSN: 1756-3305

Contact us

Submission enquiries: journalsubmissions@springernature.com