Skip to main content
Fig. 5 | Parasites & Vectors

Fig. 5

From: Comparative proteomic analysis of wall-forming bodies and oocyst wall reveals the molecular basis underlying oocyst wall formation in Eimeria necatrix

Fig. 5

Bioinformatic analysis results of WFB proteins. a WFB protein functional annotation results from GO, KEGG and COG databases. Each circle in the diagram represents the annotation result of a database, the overlapping portion represents the protein annotated jointly by multiple databases and the nonoverlapping portion represents the protein annotated separately by the corresponding database. b Summary of second-level GO assignments for WFB proteins. The x-axis represents the second-level functional categories from the GO database, and the y-axis represents the number of WFBs protein in each second-level functional category. c Top 30 GO enrichment results for WFB proteins. The x-axis represents the results of Input frequency/Background frequency in the enrichment analysis, and the y-axis represents enriched GO terms. d Summary of second-level KEGG pathway analysis for WFB proteins. The x-axis represents the number of genes in each pathway, and the y-axis indicates the main second-level pathways. e Top 30 KEGG enrichment results for WFB proteins. The x-axis represents the results of Input frequency/Background frequency in the enrichment analysis, and the y-axis represents enriched KEGG pathway terms. f COG function classification of WFB proteins. The x-axis indicates the different categories of COG, and the y-axis indicates the frequency of different categories of COG. COG, Cluster of Orthologous Groups database; GO, Gene Ontology resource; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes database; WFBs, wall-forming bodies

Back to article page