Skip to main content

Table 4 Results of the binomial generalised linear models testing the influence of sampling month, sampling year, sex, age, weight and health status on the infestation rates of European hedgehogs with adult and nymphal I. ricinus

From: Ectoparasites of European hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus) in Germany and their health impact

Variables tested in GLM model

GLM Model A: I. ricinus adultsa

GLM Model B: I. ricinus nymphsa

Estimate

SE

Z

P

Estimate

SE

Z

P

Intercept

− 1.17

0.96

− 1.22

0.223

− 2.19

1.36

− 1.61

0.108

Sampling month (reference month: January)

 February

0.39

0.80

0.49

0.627

1.94

1.18

1.65

0.100

 March

0.76

0.77

0.99

0.320

2.54

1.15

2.22

0.026*

 April

1.99

0.70

2.83

0.005*

4.12

1.12

3.69

 < 0.001*

 May

2.50

0.71

3.50

 < 0.001*

3.58

1.10

3.25

0.001*

 June

2.03

0.75

2.71

0.007*

2.97

1.13

2.64

0.008*

 July

0.92

0.72

1.27

0.205

2.29

1.12

2.04

0.041*

 August

0.71

0.77

0.92

0.358

2.60

1.15

2.25

0.024*

 September

0.47

0.75

0.63

0.531

2.49

1.13

2.20

0.028*

 October

0.83

0.72

1.15

0.251

1.41

1.14

1.23

0.217

 November

− 0.93

0.76

− 1.21

0.226

0.07

1.20

0.06

0.953

 December

− 0.80

0.90

− 0.89

0.376

− 14.48

577.10

− 0.03

0.980

Sampling year (reference year: 2018)

 2019

− 0.43

0.42

− 1.02

0.310

− 0.92

0.48

− 1.92

0.055

 2020

− 0.35

0.42

− 0.82

0.413

− 1.32

0.48

− 2.75

0.006*

 2021

− 0.32

0.60

− 0.53

0.598

− 1.68

0.64

− 2.61

0.009*

Sex (reference: male)

− 0.20

0.23

− 0.86

0.392

− 0.33

0.24

− 1.38

0.168

Age (reference age: subadult)

− 0.89

0.42

− 2.13

0.033*

− 0.18

0.41

− 0.44

0.661

Weight

 < 0.01

 < 0.01

2.60

0.009

 < 0.01

 < 0.01

1.15

0.250

Health status (reference status: health not impaired)

 Moderately impaired

0.21

0.66

0.31

0.753

0.45

0.77

0.58

0.560

 Severely impaired

 < 0.01

0.67

 < 0.01

0.999

0.49

0.77

0.64

0.525

  1. GLM Generalised linear model, SE Standard Error
  2. *Statistically significant at P ≤ 0.05
  3. aBoth models were significantly different from a null model. Model A: Chi-square = 79.25, df = 19, P < 0.001¸ Model B: Chi-square = 109.03, df = 19, P < 0.001