Skip to main content

Table 5 Results of the generalised linear models testing the influence of sampling month, sampling year, sex, age, weight and health status on the number of ticks and number of fleas infesting European hedgehogs.

From: Ectoparasites of European hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus) in Germany and their health impact

Variables tested in GLM model

GLM Model A: ticksa

GLM Model B: fleasa

Estimate

SE

Z

P

Estimate

SE

Z

P

Intercept

4.45

0.61

7.25

 < 0.001*

5.37

0.56

9.60

 < 0.001*

Sampling month (reference month: January)

 February

0.11

0.52

0.21

0.834

-0.37

0.48

-0.77

0.440

 March

− 0.56

0.51

− 1.11

0.268

0.22

0.46

0.48

0.635

 April

− 0.20

0.45

− 0.45

0.653

− 0.99

0.41

− 2.39

0.017*

 May

0.02

0.44

0.05

0.962

− 1.23

0.41

− 3.03

0.002*

 June

− 0.52

0.48

− 1.08

0.282

− 0.91

0.44

− 2.08

0.038*

 July

− 0.21

0.47

− 0.44

0.662

− 1.05

0.43

− 2.42

0.016*

 August

− 0.39

0.50

− 0.77

0.441

− 1.13

0.46

− 2.46

0.014*

 September

− 0.62

0.49

− 1.27

0.203

− 1.19

0.45

− 2.65

0.008*

 October

− 1.46

0.48

− 3.06

0.002*

− 0.01

0.43

− 0.03

0.975

 November

− 0.56

0.46

− 1.21

0.228

− 0.09

0.42

− 0.22

0.828

 December

− 1.79

0.54

− 3.29

0.001*

0.07

0.49

0.13

0.894

Sampling year (reference year: 2018)

 2019

− 0.32

0.28

− 1.15

0.251

− 0.26

0.25

− 1.05

0.295

 2020

− 0.52

0.28

− 1.85

0.065

− 0.39

0.26

− 1.51

0.130

 2021

− 0.70

0.39

− 1.78

0.074

− 0.54

0.36

− 1.49

0.137

Sex (reference: male)

− 0.08

0.15

− 0.54

0.591

− 0.25

0.14

− 1.78

0.075

Age (reference: subadult)

0.47

0.27

1.75

0.081

1.03

0.24

4.22

 < 0.001*

Weight

0.00

0.00

− 1.12

0.262

0.00

 < 0.01

− 1.97

0.049*

Health status (reference status: not impaired)

 Moderately impaired

− 0.55

0.42

− 1.31

0.191

− 0.71

0.39

− 1.83

0.067

 Severely impaired

− 0.43

0.43

− 0.99

0.324

− 0.47

0.39

− 1.18

0.237

  1. GLM Generalised linear model, SE standard Error
  2. *Statistically significant at P ≤ 0.05
  3. aBoth models were significantly different from a null model. Model A: Chi-square = 38.0, df = 19, P = 0.006. Model B: Chi-square = 68.6, df = 19, P < 0.001