Skip to main content

Table 4 Weighted mean, range and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each species complex and entomological parameter

From: Optimizing malaria vector control in the Greater Mekong Subregion: a systematic review and mathematical modelling study to identify desirable intervention characteristics

Species

Number of sites\(\dag\)

Weighted mean\(\dag\)

Range\(\dag\)

Weighted 95% CI\(\dag\)

Human blood index (HBI)

 An. dirus (a)*

6

0.87

(0.06, 1)

(0.06, 1)

 An. minimus (ab)

17

0.61

(0, 0.98)

(0.05, 0.98)

 An. sinensis (c)

51

0.10

(0, 0.98)

(0.01, 0.98)

 An. sundaicus (a)

5

0.34

(0, 0.64)

(0, 0.59)

 Maculatus group (b)

9

0.09

(0, 0.83)

(0, 0.83)

Parity proportion

 An. dirus (a)

45

0.64

(0.20, 0.80)

(0.43, 0.79)

 An. minimus (a)

68

0.60

(0.39, 0.93)

(0.48, 0.72)

 An. sinensis (a)

48

0.57

(0.11, 0.90)

(0.41, 0.73)

 An. sundaicus (a)

11

0.59

(0.29, 0.75)

(0.46, 0.74)

 Maculatus group (a)

41

0.51

(0.16, 0.78)

(0.39, 0.78)

Sac proportion

 An. dirus

2

0.33

(0.27, 0.34)

(0.27, 0.34)

 An. minimus

3

0.60

(0.60, 0.70)

(0.60, 0.60)

 An. sinensis

3

0.82

(0.16, 0.88)

(0.16, 0.88)

 An. sundaicus

1

0.32

(0.32, 0.32)

(0.32, 0.32)

 Maculatus group

3

0.50

(0.43, 0.52)

(0.43, 0.52)

Resting period duration

 An. minimus

8

 

(2, 6)

 

 An. sinensis

4

 

(1.8, 4.3)

 

 Maculatus group

4

 

(2.3, 2.4)

 
  1. *Species complexes sharing a common letter were not significantly different (Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn’s post hoc test). \(\dag\) Only data points with more than ten mosquito samples were included